You're right Tkachuk is worth Laine, but Laine is not worth Tkachuk, and it's not even close. The only player from that draft class that anyone that knows a single thing about about hockey would consider trading Tkachuk for is Matthews.I'm fully convinced you have never played Hockey in your life. Tkachuk is worth Laine. The fact you think otherwise is laughable.
There was some confusion about this on the main boards when the rumor came out that we were looking to add a defenseman because of the Valimaki injury. SOmeone suggested Stone and several people scoffed and said it wasn't allowed, but it was pointed out by someone (mouser, I think?) that it was only compliance buyouts where you could not re-acquire the player within a calendar year.Wait...
I heard we were unretiring #99 for himAnyone know what jersey number he's gonna have yet?
Just let me look in my crystal ball, I’ll get back to youWhen is Tkachuk signing ffs...
I think it's great. We know he is a good fit in the room. I think Tre gave him a chance to find another gig for more money and when he couldn't he stayed where he wanted to play.Tbh I like it. Perfect extra, also this ensures Kylington won’t be thrown to the wolves.
I hear he destroys scissorsNever heard of this Stone guy. Is he any good and why do I get this feeling that he hates scissors and is afraid of paper?
Also does this mean we are trading Brodie again?
I am worried about this, Matthew Tkachuk and Mangiapane should have been the targets. Who the hell cares about signing depth D, when we already has that.
How are the two related at all?