JurassicTunga
it is what it is
- Mar 21, 2010
- 7,601
- 4,920
Weekes: Flames, Devils, Kings, Bruins all in on goalie discussions, including potential 3 way deals
- Thread starter JurassicTunga
- Start date
WolfgangPuck
Registered User
- May 12, 2012
- 2,017
- 2,792
Weekes must have an inside source at the NHL trade office. He tends to announce the trades first hand
Toffili to Kings.
Mangiapane to Bruins.
Markstrom and picks to New Jersey.
Mercer and picks to Calgary.
Mangiapane to Bruins.
Markstrom and picks to New Jersey.
Mercer and picks to Calgary.
WolfgangPuck
Registered User
- May 12, 2012
- 2,017
- 2,792
What about the Alvs ?
Wasn’t it announced by Seravalli that Alvs were 100% into a goalie?
Wasn’t it announced by Seravalli that Alvs were 100% into a goalie?
Okay Me (Boston) and Winnipeg have talked and come to an arrangement, LA has Markstrom on Weekends and Ullmark on weekdays and NJ has Ulmark on Weekends and Markstrom on Weekdays. Does that sound fair to you guys?
LA and NJ: Fiiiiiiiiiiine.
LA and NJ: Fiiiiiiiiiiine.
Some Other Flame
Registered User
- Dec 4, 2010
- 7,408
- 8,755
Weekes sure is desperate for a three way
a mangy Meowth
Ross Colton Fan
kingskring
Registered User
- Dec 3, 2012
- 3,611
- 1,882
ATypicalCanadian
Registered User
To CGY: Rittich
To LA: Schmid
To NJ: Vladar
Send it in right before the deadline.
To LA: Schmid
To NJ: Vladar
Send it in right before the deadline.
Zippy316
aka Zippo
Wonder if an NJ/CGY/LA three way could work.
Just the general framework here, deal could be a lot bigger to include Holtz or some of the other NJ extras like Nosek, Miller, Smith. Likewise, maybe there’s someone more desirable from LA to CGY than Kaliyev.
To NJ: Markstrom
To LAK: Toffoli (75% Retention)
To CGY: Kaliyev + 1st
Small pieces to balance it out if need be, but the trade would break down, per team like this:
NJ: Toffoli (50% retention) for Markstrom
LAK: Kaliyev + 1st for Toffoli @ 25%
CGY: Markstrom + 25% Toffoli for Kaliyev + 1st
Just the general framework here, deal could be a lot bigger to include Holtz or some of the other NJ extras like Nosek, Miller, Smith. Likewise, maybe there’s someone more desirable from LA to CGY than Kaliyev.
To NJ: Markstrom
To LAK: Toffoli (75% Retention)
To CGY: Kaliyev + 1st
Small pieces to balance it out if need be, but the trade would break down, per team like this:
NJ: Toffoli (50% retention) for Markstrom
LAK: Kaliyev + 1st for Toffoli @ 25%
CGY: Markstrom + 25% Toffoli for Kaliyev + 1st
Atoyot
Registered User
- Jul 19, 2013
- 13,859
- 25,268
When he says something is done, it's done.
When he says he's hearing something, it's something that he's hearing that isn't guaranteed to go through.
There are way too many posters here that think that if an insider isn't 100% right, they're 100% wrong.
Burner phones - you know what else burns? A flame. And you see flames in hell, where the devil resides. This is a subtle message that Calgary are about to trade Markstrom to New Jersey.
5-D chess baby.
ZachaFlockaFlame
Registered User
- Aug 24, 2020
- 13,620
- 17,247
Why do you think Dawson Mercer is Bettlejuice and by mentioning him consistently that it'll happen? You keep mentioning his name in every thread there's a remote NJ/CGY rumor
Lunatik
Registered User
- Oct 12, 2012
- 56,248
- 8,384
Seems very unlikely that Kaliyev and a 1st is enough for Flames ownership to greenlight this deal.
I really think it's going to take a deal that ownership can't say no to.
ZachaFlockaFlame
Registered User
- Aug 24, 2020
- 13,620
- 17,247
Just mentioning him because by all reports he is the player the Flames said they need for any Markstrom trade involving the Devils.Why do you think Dawson Mercer is Bettlejuice and by mentioning him consistently that it'll happen? You keep mentioning his name in every thread there's a remote NJ/CGY rumor
ZachaFlockaFlame
Registered User
- Aug 24, 2020
- 13,620
- 17,247
NJ isn't moving Mercer in a Markstrom trade, lmao. He was off limits in a WPG trade with Hellebuyck last year, which in hindsight, we'd probably do right now. But he for sure isn't going for Markstrom. Would be an abject failure from Fitz. It was Holtz + for a retained Markstrom a couple of weeks ago. Not sure how Markstrom without retention earns Mercer.
Dreger said the Flames ask was Mercer + a high pick. If the Devils think they can sneak in with Meier getting healthy and Tampa collapsing, they might get desperate.
ZachaFlockaFlame
Registered User
- Aug 24, 2020
- 13,620
- 17,247
NJ is balking at this, why would the price get higher without retention? That makes no sense in the world unless Fitz is a moron
HarrySPlinkett
Not a film critic
Lmao picking Dawson Mercer over Connor Hellebuyck certainly is a decision.
ZachaFlockaFlame
Registered User
- Aug 24, 2020
- 13,620
- 17,247
Last year, he was coming off an absurd year and the Devils thought he'd be on pace for 25-30 goals again on an ELC which would've been gold for us. He's legitimately fell off the face of the earth this year. Selling him low would be bad is all.
Lunatik
Registered User
- Oct 12, 2012
- 56,248
- 8,384
No he didn't. He said that's what he thinks it would take and even said if Calgary asks too much NJ could walk away, but he believes Fitz is willing to do almost anything.
