Sabre Dance
Make Hockey Fun Again
- Jul 27, 2006
- 12,456
- 2,243
So your position is that by not trading these guys, they couldn't possibly be committed to a full rebuild and the ensuing "suffering"?
Maybe they were simply thinking...
"Hey, we are going to be awful next year... but WITH Vanek and Miller for a large portion of the season, we will be comparatively awful... like other teams that have bottomed out over the years... you know... like maybe we'll only win 25-30 games.... we'll be terrible... but comparatively terrible.... BUT if we trade them now, and pursue the rest of our plan of making moves only for the future, then we will be ALL TIME AWFUL... like potentially record book awful.... like 9 win awful.... so lets keep them around until the deadline"
Given the way the season has gone (Vanek and Miller are pretty much the only reason we are in most games).... that speculative assessment above would be spot on.
Do you think Vanek's value is higher now? Miller's?
Can you criticize Regier for me, tell me 1 thing he has done wrong in your opinion during the Pegula era.