Not sure how you can ignore this or the rest of the season as a whole. At what point does Hasso step in?A team that has Vlasic, Burns, and Karlsson in their top 4 just got outscored 20-6 in 4 games.
Not sure how you can ignore this or the rest of the season as a whole. At what point does Hasso step in?A team that has Vlasic, Burns, and Karlsson in their top 4 just got outscored 20-6 in 4 games.
Ok, here are some new head coach ideas. Hitchcock, Blysma, Caryle... they have won cups and i don't think are abusive. Bogner could be interm coach as he has NHL coaching experience.
Not sure how you can ignore this or the rest of the season as a whole. At what point does Hasso step in?
he won’t unless attendance plummets.
so what you’re saying is that we as fans must destroy the teams attendance to save it
They lost a bunch of casual fans to the Warriors and with them being garbage now is the time to get them back. They can't afford to be this bad.he won’t unless attendance plummets.
A team that has Vlasic, Burns, and Karlsson in their top 4 just got outscored 20-6 in 4 games.
I don't buy it. This roster is good enough to win, and they've shown flashes of it. Yes, Hertl's hurt and playing below capacity. Yes, Thornton is older and slower than he was last year. But I refuse to believe that the other 10-12 forwards on the roster have all regressed at once.DeBoer has some fault, but right now, this recent stretch, it comes down to the roster. Defensively, they have not been porous because of bad structure or strategy, but because of poor execution. Bad goaltending, Simek-Burns being tire-fire, and the lack of forward depth being exposed. Hertl was the Sharks's top forward last season and he's at, what, 80% right now? Thornton has severely regressed, Meier has regressed, and no player outside of Goodrow has really taken the "next step". Specifically, DW made a bet that he could replace Pavelski/Donskoi/Nyquist internally and he lost.
I also don't buy it because a coach should be able to alter their system to maximize the potential of their roster. Deboer doesn't do that, whereas Barry Trotz has found a way to take a roster with less talent and have them play above their ability. I think Deboer is a below average talent evaluator.I don't buy it. This roster is good enough to win, and they've shown flashes of it. Yes, Hertl's hurt and playing below capacity. Yes, Thornton is older and slower than he was last year. But I refuse to believe that the other 10-12 forwards on the roster have all regressed at once.
Thornton has picked it up recently, and shown that he can still drive possession. Goodrow, Gambrell and Gregor have all proven themselves to be reasonable bottom-6 forwards. The top-6 is missing an impact winger, sure, but the forward group isn't so shallow as to be outscored 20-6 in four games. Watching them play, I see a team that isn't supporting the puck on the breakout, isn't possessing the puck in the offensive zone, and isn't tracking and sorting on defense. Especially on the breakout, it looks like guys are getting the puck, looking around for their teammates, and making reaction passes that often end up behind the target/in his skates. That's unstructured, poorly-coached play. Nobody knows where their teammates are going to be at any given moment, and it leads to two guys covering the same man on defense, blind passes to empty ice, and breakaways the other way.
Jones could be better, for sure. Burns looks lost so far. But to my eye, it seems like most of the individual shortcomings/failure to execute are a sum-of-their-parts thing that comes back to coaching and expectations.
I don't buy it. This roster is good enough to win, and they've shown flashes of it. Yes, Hertl's hurt and playing below capacity. Yes, Thornton is older and slower than he was last year. But I refuse to believe that the other 10-12 forwards on the roster have all regressed at once.
Thornton has picked it up recently, and shown that he can still drive possession. Goodrow, Gambrell and Gregor have all proven themselves to be reasonable bottom-6 forwards. The top-6 is missing an impact winger, sure, but the forward group isn't so shallow as to be outscored 20-6 in four games. Watching them play, I see a team that isn't supporting the puck on the breakout, isn't possessing the puck in the offensive zone, and isn't tracking and sorting on defense. Especially on the breakout, it looks like guys are getting the puck, looking around for their teammates, and making reaction passes that often end up behind the target/in his skates. That's unstructured, poorly-coached play. Nobody knows where their teammates are going to be at any given moment, and it leads to two guys covering the same man on defense, blind passes to empty ice, and breakaways the other way.
Jones could be better, for sure. Burns looks lost so far. But to my eye, it seems like most of the individual shortcomings/failure to execute are a sum-of-their-parts thing that comes back to coaching and expectations.
I also don't buy it because a coach should be able to alter their system to maximize the potential of their roster. Deboer doesn't do that, whereas Barry Trotz has found a way to take a roster with less talent and have them play above their ability. I think Deboer is a below average talent evaluator.
Deboer had a clear say in the additions of Zubrus, Spaling and Boedker (you could argue Prout or Polak, but I don't know of any proof that Deboer lobbied for them) and his odd love for Micheal Haley. He also thinks much higher of Melker Karlsson than almost anyone else, and I wouldn't be surprised if Melker can't find a steady job in the NHL after he leaves the Sharks. He didn't think highly enough of Nieto or Carpenter to prevent them from being waived. Look at Donskoi, and then read Donskoi's comments after he signed with Colorado. Deboer's input into personnel decisions has been poor and I think it is reflective of his inability to evaluate players well.I’m not saying that the other forwards have all regressed. They just weren’t that good to begin with (and the Sharks are facing better teams in this stretch), and without their top players driving the way, the Sharks don’t have a lot of weapons.
The way I see it, if Jones is “average”, the Sharks need Hertl, Burns, and Karlsson doing their thing to be considered a contender. If they have two going, they can be competitive. With only one going, they will lose more often than not. And with none going, they will never win. And when Jones is poor, everything goes out the window.
It is one thing to make a bad team on paper and good team on the ice, and another to make a good team on paper a great team on the ice.
Regarding DeBoer’s ability to evaluate talent...what player did DeBoer really do disservice to? What happened to all those talented players that DeBoer passed over? Except for maybe Adam Larson, I can’t think of a time DeBoer really misjudged talent. Look at how board-favorite Joakim Ryan is doing...and look at how a player we hated in DeMelo is getting a ton of love in Ottawa for his ability to drive play (I’m shocked, to be honest).
I don’t see him getting fired. We are within a few points for the 3rd division spot with 50 games to play.I'm thinking if he gets fired it will be after the preds game or not at all...
Deboer had a clear say in the additions of Zubrus, Spaling and Boedker (you could argue Prout or Polak, but I don't know of any proof that Deboer lobbied for them) and his odd love for Micheal Haley.
He also thinks much higher of Melker Karlsson than almost anyone else, and I wouldn't be surprised if Melker can't find a steady job in the NHL after he leaves the Sharks.
He didn't think highly enough of Nieto or Carpenter to prevent them from being waived.
Look at Donskoi, and then read Donskoi's comments after he signed with Colorado. Deboer's input into personnel decisions has been poor and I think it is reflective of his inability to evaluate players well.
I actually liked Spaling, Polak, and Zubrus. Boedker wasn’t a terrible player...a poor fit but decently productive.
The Prout signing contributes to my point. I was against the signing, because I thought Prout would be taking a spot away from a more deserving player. But, it is clear to me that those players aren’t ready. People, including myself, overrated Middleton/DeSimone/etc. Tim Heed had a poor camp and start to the year. When Ferraro earned his spot, DeBoer showed little hesitation in playing him over Prout.
This season has somewhat softened my stance on Karlsson (and Barclay Goodrow, for that matter). Granted, his contract vitiates his value. Contract aside, however, he absolutely deserves to be in the lineup. He’s better than Radil, Gambrell, and Suomela. Fans constantly harangued DeBoer to give the young players a shot, pointing to Karlsson getting an undeserved spot. Yet, when poor depth forced DeBoer to give those young players a chance, it became clear that they didn’t deserve it. Gambrell, Bergmann, Yurtaikin, Radil...they are not (and maybe never will be) ready.
Both played their way off of San Jose, and DW waived them so they could get opportunity elsewhere. Carpenter had a strong year in Vegas, but he’s back to being a fringe NHLer. Nieto is a solid fourth-liner; he would have been useful this year but clearly had no room in the lineup the last two years. Perhaps I am being tendentious, but I don’t think his departure from San Jose was a result of DeBoer misjudging his talent.
Again, this isn’t by dint of poor talent evaluation, this was a combination of Donskoi not being a good fit, not playing well, and his contract demands. The Avalanche were fortunate to take the Sharks to seven games last season; they clearly struggled against the Sharks heavy, physical style of play. Donskoi doesn’t help them in that regard.
and i bet prout gets back into the lineup over him in the future