That price seems ridiculous. Who has more value a rental winger that’s best season was 21 goals and 41 points or a defenseman like Muzzin who is not a rental? It is not even close in my opinion. Not only is Muzzin the much better player he is also not a rental. If the asking price for Muzzin is a 1st and a prospect then who is paying a 1st and prospect for Ferland?
Heck I remember getting Hossa for not much more than that as a rental and he was 10 times the player Ferland was. We also got Dupuis in that deal and he was the next best player in that deal. I think we gave a 1st, Armstrong, and Christinsen, and some other scrub I can’t remember. I hope Rutherford is not in on Ferland for that price. I doubt it because Rutherford usually doesn’t go the rental route very often. Waste of assets, rather spend 1st and prospect on someone with term.