yazmybaby
Registered User
We will get Watson next year.They're not in a position to get someone like that at the moment.
Besides, for all any of us know, it could be Stidham.
We will get Watson next year.They're not in a position to get someone like that at the moment.
Besides, for all any of us know, it could be Stidham.
The bitterness from the Brady bootlickers trying to declaim the entirety of Belichick's career and acting like the QB has singlehandedly carried otherwise perennial 5-11 teams to superbowls is infuriating.
zero playoff wins without Tom Brady. Works both ways, but Brady is 43, so it's up to Bill to show what a great genius he is.
I don't even know why the discussion needs to happen.
Brady's great.
Belichick's great.
Put 'em together, and you get 20 years of dominance unlike anything the sport has ever seen.
It was coming to an end soon either way, and to be honest, it was probably time for the two parties to go their separate ways.
Best of luck, Tom.
Time to get to work building the next great Patriots team, Bill.
zero playoff wins without Tom Brady. Works both ways, but Brady is 43, so it's up to Bill to show what a great genius he is.
Nobody wanted this storyline but how Brady and belichick do apart next year will be discussed more than any other topic over the next year by every pundit
Understood.Nobody wanted this storyline but how Brady and belichick do apart next year will be discussed more than any other topic over the next year by every pundit
Understood.
It's still a dumb discussion that will be ripe with near brain dead hot takes.
I've seen multiple people claim the homes are going to be the navy color rush with the red and white striped shoulders they've used a few times.Back to uniform talk, Zolak is teasing that we're going to see the 90s whites come back. He was really specific about it being the road white ones, so maybe this is like the time the Red Sox changed their roads to the old 80s ones while keeping the home ones the same.
Can we put that 14-6 record in context. They went 11-5 in 2008 1 year after going 16-0. Basically not having Brady that year cost them at least 3 wins and they didn't make the playoffs.except they went 14-6 without him....
Huge part of winning 6 Super Bowls. Their most important player, without question. But they can be a good team without him. They’ve done it before.
You didn't like Brady and you are happy he is gone. Good for you.The bitterness from the Brady bootlickers trying to declaim the entirety of Belichick's career and acting like the QB has singlehandedly carried otherwise perennial 5-11 teams to superbowls is infuriating.
Can we put that 14-6 record in context. They went 11-5 in 2008 1 year after going 16-0. Basically not having Brady that year cost them at least 3 wins and they didn't make the playoffs.
I had season tickets that year and I believe they had the best point differential in the NFL.Can we put that 14-6 record in context. They went 11-5 in 2008 1 year after going 16-0. Basically not having Brady that year cost them at least 3 wins and they didn't make the playoffs.
They were just hitting their peak in December too. They blew out the eventual NFC champion Cardinals in the snow in Foxboro that December.I had season tickets that year and I believe they had the best point differential in the NFL.
had they made the playoffs they could have run the table
One of my favorite teams in the run
The other way you could look at it is that they went 11-5 with Cassel in 2008, and then he left and Brady went 10-6 in 2009.Can we put that 14-6 record in context. They went 11-5 in 2008 1 year after going 16-0. Basically not having Brady that year cost them at least 3 wins and they didn't make the playoffs.