Getson IMO was the strongest on south shore by far.....hockey sense wise Nauss was not there without the puck but his speed and craftyness got his chances and goals for him, he created in the offensive end but his strength was not there either, he was good but Getson created a lot more dangrous oppertunities than he did, in the 1st alone Getson had 3 great playmakings passes and 2 nice shots, in the 2nd he had another two great scoring chances and one really nice pass to set up the play....in the 3rd Getson should have had an assist where he worked the puck out of the corner and kicked it out to the defense and the forward picked up the rebound off the defender shot and scored but they never gave him one....Getson was working hard on the boards and stronger on the puck more than Nausse is....IMO Getson did more things a lot more right than Nauss, Nauss is good but to me he looks like a Luc Poirier where Getson looks like a young James Sheppard but better skater.This was a good game, lots of back and forth scoring and chances. Alex Nauss for SS was the team's strongest player, I think.
Anyone else watch it?
Getson looks like a young James Sheppard but better skater.
Scoutman, based on your comments, I would say you are VERY high on Getson...Did anyone else stand out to you during the game?
I see some similarities to James Sheppard but not with as much offensive upside as Sheppard had at the Major Junior level. IMO Getson is a 3rd line, 30-40 point player and will be more of a defensive forward
lol crazy thing is I think Mitch Balmas is better but everyone knows him....Getson gets no love so i put him as my avator.You mean his Avatar didnt give it away?
I remember people were saying im nuts because there was no way James Sheppard was as good as Benjamin Breault or Jason Legault.
Sorry but i think your over-hyping Getson,I do not see the long term success in his game. There are two dozen kids in Midget who can put up big numbers like Getson and it just take one person over-hyping them to get there name at the lead of the pack, Is it hockey politics ? family connections ? who knows but that is all it takes at this level. I stand by my comments as a 3rd liner and in 2 years we'll see who is eating crow andGetson will likely be the next Benjamin Breault or Jason Legault
everyone has their own way of looking at things if you do not see talent in him then you don't......but your fact was there are a dozen kids who can put up the numbers when there isn't especially 1st year players so you are totally wrong on that,
Actually, he's probably right (although your wording/syntax makes it a bit hard to understand what you're saying). Just looking at first year players in Ontario midget, for example, at least the top 3 scorers were 15 year old first year midgets who put up ~2 PPG numbers and are playing as 16 year olds in the OHL this year. So I don't know if you guys were talking just locally or not, but there are poop tonnes of first year midgets across the country who torch their local league, and taken as a group I'm pretty sure they end up in wildly different career paths from there.
Actually, he's probably right (although your wording/syntax makes it a bit hard to understand what you're saying). Just looking at first year players in Ontario midget, for example, at least the top 3 scorers were 15 year old first year midgets who put up ~2 PPG numbers and are playing as 16 year olds in the OHL this year. So I don't know if you guys were talking just locally or not, but there are poop tonnes of first year midgets across the country who torch their local league, and taken as a group I'm pretty sure they end up in wildly different career paths from there.
anyway im not going to ruin this thread with your immaturity.....from here on out I will not be responding to anymore of your messages....Sounds to me how you hype Getson, he pours the milk for your cornflakes each morning.
I didn't mean to start a chat war, I was just wondering if there were any other players that played remotely as well as he did in your opinion...You only mentioned him, yet he didn't even score a goal and like you said he had one assist that they didn't give him credit for.
I didn't mean to start a chat war, I was just wondering if there were any other players that played remotely as well as he did in your opinion...You only mentioned him, yet he didn't even score a goal and like you said he had one assist that they didn't give him credit for.
well pickard played well in the 1st but started to not play bad but not has good as he was in the 1st and 2nd.....Morgan Nauss was good for south shore but I do not see high draft pick in him, Barrett Deschysyn played very well showed off his smooth skating and and good hockey sense......but stats like said are not every thing though a star forward you want to see dominate in points Getson is by the way putting up great points right now as is Balmas, but I will say in our scout meetings if i brought points up they would not even listen to me....my head scout does not even look at points at all he will never go on the website and look at the players points.....if a guy is playing in a game and creates 5 or 6 scoring chances but his linemates are not putting his great passes in the net and he is getting good shots on goal but the other goalie is playing well, well the guy is a great player in the game and could even be a star in the game over a guy who stood at the side of the net and banged in two wide open goals but did nothing else in the whole game....on paper you think this guy had a great game.
well pickard played well in the 1st but started to not play bad but not has good as he was in the 1st and 2nd.....Morgan Nauss was good for south shore but I do not see high draft pick in him, Barrett Deschysyn played very well showed off his smooth skating and and good hockey sense......but stats like said are not every thing though a star forward you want to see dominate in points Getson is by the way putting up great points right now as is Balmas, but I will say in our scout meetings if i brought points up they would not even listen to me....my head scout does not even look at points at all he will never go on the website and look at the players points.....if a guy is playing in a game and creates 5 or 6 scoring chances but his linemates are not putting his great passes in the net and he is getting good shots on goal but the other goalie is playing well, well the guy is a great player in the game and could even be a star in the game over a guy who stood at the side of the net and banged in two wide open goals but did nothing else in the whole game....on paper you think this guy had a great game.
well the bias IMO is the Quebec teams are slowly getting rid of their Atlantic scouts, i know Gatineau went from 14 scouts to only 4 this year and none in the Maritimes, I know their Maritime scouts are working with other teams now. The fact is these Quebec teams are only seeing the Maritime teams in tournaments such as Monctonian where they are playing for 5 days straight and some times 2 games a day, and through a sweep through Quebec region which is not much, personally I do not think you can get a good look at a player only watching limited veiwings and I think when a Quebec team does that it shows their dedication to Maritime players as they are watching the Quebec guys play every weekend they become very familier with those players and as we all do show favorites to a quebec based player than a Maritime player, but it does not always work, as was evident when the head quebec scouts told me Peter Trainor, Brandon Whitney, Mason McDonald were not any good, and telling me that Quebec has 30 guys just like Stephen MacAuley, etc etc etc.
I think the favoritism comes from the head scouts being based in Quebec and taking players they are familiarized too, players who they deem are english speaking and will have tough time adjusting to french life, the whole fact that in quebec a local player will sell more than an outside player......maritime time teams do a little bit the same but i feel more of a bias through Quebec based teams then Maritime teams working with both sides of the borders. It is a shame because talented players from the Maritimes are falling in the draft, and some players from Quebec who are not as good as some of these Maritimers are getting picked ahead........and i know teams like the Mooseheads and such their head scouts are based in Quebec hence Maxime Fortier getting picked in the 2nd round, IMO there were better Maritime players ranked in the 2nd round then him such as Campbell Pickard, JM Leblanc.