VainGretzky
Registered User
- Jun 4, 2015
- 13,224
- 10,934
Bettman is he really going to sign with the Oilers? Yep looks that way. Bettman keep the investigation going
The whole thing was he would of had a negative test but the Canadian border rules is 14 days after a positive test you are NOT allowed to fly, even if you test day 8 as negative you can’t fly for 14 days. So for him to have boarded that plane he would of had to say he didn’t have that positive test.
This is at least based off the info from the website. So he could have a negative test on day 8 but the border rules still would have prohibited it, IF he told the truth.
I think it’s 1. They don’t want public scrutiny till people forget his contract was terminated . 2. The Grounds for which is contract were terminated have to be rock solid, the Sharks got out from under an anchor, which I don’t think they are.Bettman is he really going to sign with the Oilers? Yep looks that way. Bettman keep the investigation going
I think it’s 1. They don’t want public scrutiny till people forget his contract was terminated . 2. The Grounds for which is contract were terminated have to be rock solid, the Sharks got out from under an anchor, which I don’t think they are.
The decision will be expected shortly after he signs with a non oiler teamIt was reported on weekend that a decision is likely to come by monday or tuesday. So following the trend, they'll announce that the decision is expected to come by weekend.
I think it’s 1. They don’t want public scrutiny till people forget his contract was terminated . 2. The Grounds for which is contract were terminated have to be rock solid, the Sharks got out from under an anchor, which I don’t think they are.
The NHL already concluded Sharks had grounds to terminate contract and supported their reasoning. Revisiting decision you made based on "facts" you've gathered is amateur and looks terrible on the NHL. Especially considering the magnitude of terminating player contracts.
Can this shit be over with yet?