Confirmed with Link: Ethan Bear Traded to Car For Warren Foegele

Canes

Registered User
Oct 31, 2017
25,033
69,581
An Oblate Spheroid
To me, Forsling looked miles better than Fleury did during the 19-20 pre-season. To this day, I don’t get why he got sent down to Charlotte that year and not Fleury, both were subject to waivers then. I guess Fleury’s draft position “won” him a spot on the team that year.
Probably because preseason play really doesn't matter much or preseason Canes MVP Julien Gauthier would have been in the top 6 after his preseason a few years ago.
 

Chrispy

Salakuljettaja's Blues
Feb 25, 2009
8,297
26,679
Cary, NC
Which is ironic after the previous year Rod sent Fleury down despite being equal to better than TVR in camp, Rod said he wasn’t going to send down a veteran to the minors because of a numbers game or something like that.

Forsling had 122 career NHL games when he was sent down in 2019. Fleury had 87. That became 132 for Fleury vs 122 for Forsling in 2021 preseason camp when Forsling was sniped by Florida off waivers.

Forsling is only 1 month older than Fleury. I don't think this one falls under "veteran vs prospect".

Edit: In contrast, TVR had played 158 games for Chicago and 79 for Carolina (237 total) by 2018 vs Fleury's 67 games, TVR was 5 years older, and I believe Fleury was still waiver exempt.
 
Last edited:

bleedgreen

Registered User
Dec 8, 2003
23,944
38,993
colorado
Visit site
Forsling had 122 career NHL games when he was sent down in 2019. Fleury had 87. That became 132 for Fleury vs 122 for Forsling in 2021 preseason camp when Forsling was sniped by Florida off waivers.

Forsling is only 1 month older than Fleury. I don't think this one falls under "veteran vs prospect".

Edit: In contrast, TVR had played 158 games for Chicago and 79 for Carolina (237 total) by 2018 vs Fleury's 67 games, TVR was 5 years older, and I believe Fleury was still waiver exempt.
I’m not sure why you put all that in there. I’d say it’s more of Rod being Rod. TVR was a vet and he was going to give the vet the nod over Fleury. Fleury over Forsling is being a “vet” with the team vs being an unknown with the team. Just like when Dougie tore it up statistically for Calgary but needed in Rod’s eyes to be babysat on pp2 with Slavin all season to sit for the “Canes vet” Faulk who had never been to Dougie’s level but was the incumbent despite lesser play than Dougie all season.

Im saying our coach has a preference for guys he knows from doing time in our system. If they both had equal time in the system but one was more vet than the other hed presumably lean towards the vet. At least early in his coaching career. Sitting Forsling for Fleury despite the opinion of a poster that Forsling had played better in that camp has a precedent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tryamw and DaveG

Chrispy

Salakuljettaja's Blues
Feb 25, 2009
8,297
26,679
Cary, NC
My point was that if anything, Forsling had more experience than Fleury. Fleury had just been sent down the previous season for a more experienced option in TVR.

The major change was that Fleury lost his waiver exemption and they weren’t willing to risk him. Forsling was part of the return in the de Haan deal but the primary return was the cap space.

I don’t think this was Rod going with an internal veteran; this was not being willing to lose Fleury on waivers compared to a lower D they just acquired. And I think not exposing Fleury to waivers was front office based as well as coach based.
 

LakeLivin

Armchair Quarterback
Mar 11, 2016
4,717
13,584
North Carolina
1) From what I've heard, Bear seems to be a pretty good dude. Absolutely love to see it.

2) He has some serious flow. We're going to need that since Brock left.

Ned says "hold my hair dryer!"

f368878b-7473-4527-af42-c64b277e0299_1920x1080.jpg
 

Lempo

Recovering Future Considerations Truther
Sponsor
Feb 23, 2014
26,871
83,761
It is a constant grievance with dog owners in my whereabouts that some people don't have to go any further that running at the local sawdust track to feel excused enough to excuse themselves in the bush, and then when the said owners take their dogs for a walk at the track they (the dogs) will very literally go soil themselves in the human leavings.
 

GIN ANTONIC

Registered User
Aug 19, 2007
18,883
14,899
Toronto, ON
So I just read through like 11 pages on the Oilers forum about Ethan Bear's body fat % and what he eats for lunch. God, I hate my 'fellow' Canadian hockey fans.

Anyway, this has probably already been discussed here but from what I can gather on Bear he's a high IQ defender with good instincts, makes the smart play/pass and has some offensive ability as well.

Cannot seem to get a good read on whether or not he can actually defend or not but the cons on him are he's below average speed and not physical. Because he's a bit undersized he can get roughed up in the D zone somewhat.

I think D pairings are still a guess at this point but I don't see a fit with him and Slavin... maybe him and Skjei though. I think to start the year I'd be most comfortable with this.

Slavin - Pesce
Skjei - Bear
Cole - TDA

But who knows really.
 

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
48,359
97,938
I’ve had many interactions with @ChaoticOrange over the years, sometimes agreeing, sometimes disagreeing (particularly on trade values) but I always thought he had a fair assessment of Oilers players. Would be good to hear his assessment of Bear here.
 

Svechhammer

THIS is hockey?
Jun 8, 2017
23,854
87,792
So I just read through like 11 pages on the Oilers forum about Ethan Bear's body fat % and what he eats for lunch. God, I hate my 'fellow' Canadian hockey fans.

Anyway, this has probably already been discussed here but from what I can gather on Bear he's a high IQ defender with good instincts, makes the smart play/pass and has some offensive ability as well.

Cannot seem to get a good read on whether or not he can actually defend or not but the cons on him are he's below average speed and not physical. Because he's a bit undersized he can get roughed up in the D zone somewhat.

I think D pairings are still a guess at this point but I don't see a fit with him and Slavin... maybe him and Skjei though. I think to start the year I'd be most comfortable with this.

Slavin - Pesce
Skjei - Bear
Cole - TDA

But who knows really.
I really don't want Slavin and Pesce to be a pair. They never really clicked in the past, and I worry that makes the 2nd line such a downgrade from what we had that its a net negative.

At the same time, no idea who else could play with Slavin, as I sure as heck don't want it to be TDA.
 

bleedgreen

Registered User
Dec 8, 2003
23,944
38,993
colorado
Visit site
I really don't want Slavin and Pesce to be a pair. They never really clicked in the past, and I worry that makes the 2nd line such a downgrade from what we had that its a net negative.

At the same time, no idea who else could play with Slavin, as I sure as heck don't want it to be TDA.
Did you just say Slavin and Pesce didn’t click in the past? They were the best pair I’ve ever seen us have?
 

spockBokk

Registered User
Sep 8, 2013
7,123
17,864
I don’t think you mess with Skjei-Pesce, for continuity’s sake. However, I believe Skjei has some familiarity playing with TDA so that could be a thing. I imagine TDA ends up with Slavin eventually, but could easily see he and Bear changing partners with Cole and Slavin multiple times in season, if not in games, based on situations.
 

GOilers88

#DustersWinCups
Dec 24, 2016
14,405
21,182
So I just read through like 11 pages on the Oilers forum about Ethan Bear's body fat % and what he eats for lunch. God, I hate my 'fellow' Canadian hockey fans.

Anyway, this has probably already been discussed here but from what I can gather on Bear he's a high IQ defender with good instincts, makes the smart play/pass and has some offensive ability as well.

Cannot seem to get a good read on whether or not he can actually defend or not but the cons on him are he's below average speed and not physical. Because he's a bit undersized he can get roughed up in the D zone somewhat.

I think D pairings are still a guess at this point but I don't see a fit with him and Slavin... maybe him and Skjei though. I think to start the year I'd be most comfortable with this.

Slavin - Pesce
Skjei - Bear
Cole - TDA

But who knows really.
I think it's more likely that Bear winds up somewhere between his rookie season and last year. He clearly has the talent and the drive to be a solid defenseman in this league and playing with a really solid core of D-men like you guys have will do wonders for him. Gut says this trade winds up looking lopsided in favor of Carolina in a few years, but I'm excited for Foegele as well, as he's exactly what our middle six needed. I think Bears back to back playoff performances sealed his fate. While he had some heavy struggles, most of the team did so it's hard to say it's all on him.

And yes, our board can be an absolute effin cesspool even at the best of times. Outside of a handful of really good posters I'd say it's the last place you should go for any real unbiased insight into Oilers players. Too much crap to wade through to find anything of value.
 

ChaoticOrange

Registered User
Jun 29, 2008
50,579
29,244
Edmonton
I’ve had many interactions with @ChaoticOrange over the years, sometimes agreeing, sometimes disagreeing (particularly on trade values) but I always thought he had a fair assessment of Oilers players. Would be good to hear his assessment of Bear here.

You're too kind. I try to be reasonable.

Bear looked like an emerging 2/3 defenceman for the Oilers in 19/20. Made smart, heads up plays. The master of the ten foot pass. Very good at getting himself out of trouble, excellent hockey IQ. Didn't get much for offensive opportunities, but has it in him - won WHL defenceman of the year with Seattle.

This last year he was used more as a 4/5, which many of us disagreed with. He got a puck in the head sitting on the bench which resulted in a concussion and him missing ten or so games, and when he came back he had a bit of trouble getting up to speed - five games or so. Unfortunately, that was enough (combined with his relatively small size, non-physical game, and to be frank, not being white put him behind the 8-ball from the beginning for a vocal, stupid minority) for many fans and some media members to turn on him. His underlying numbers were excellent, he continued to do a huge number of little things well, but it was never enough for some and because Barrie is the secondary assist master of the NHL and Larsson was having a good year, he frequently got relegated to the third pairing and lost the coaching staff's trust in the playoffs.

The truth of the matter is nobody for sure knows what Bear is right now, but given his first two full seasons in the NHL, it's probably fairest to say that he's somewhere between a #3 defenceman to a #5 defenceman. On your team he could play on any pairing and do really well. We're excited to see what Foegele can bring, but many - myself included - were not happy to see that deal go down and think that we got the worst of it.
 

GIN ANTONIC

Registered User
Aug 19, 2007
18,883
14,899
Toronto, ON
You're too kind. I try to be reasonable.

Bear looked like an emerging 2/3 defenceman for the Oilers in 19/20. Made smart, heads up plays. The master of the ten foot pass. Very good at getting himself out of trouble, excellent hockey IQ. Didn't get much for offensive opportunities, but has it in him - won WHL defenceman of the year with Seattle.

This last year he was used more as a 4/5, which many of us disagreed with. He got a puck in the head sitting on the bench which resulted in a concussion and him missing ten or so games, and when he came back he had a bit of trouble getting up to speed - five games or so. Unfortunately, that was enough (combined with his relatively small size, non-physical game, and to be frank, not being white put him behind the 8-ball from the beginning for a vocal, stupid minority) for many fans and some media members to turn on him. His underlying numbers were excellent, he continued to do a huge number of little things well, but it was never enough for some and because Barrie is the secondary assist master of the NHL and Larsson was having a good year, he frequently got relegated to the third pairing and lost the coaching staff's trust in the playoffs.

The truth of the matter is nobody for sure knows what Bear is right now, but given his first two full seasons in the NHL, it's probably fairest to say that he's somewhere between a #3 defenceman to a #5 defenceman. On your team he could play on any pairing and do really well. We're excited to see what Foegele can bring, but many - myself included - were not happy to see that deal go down and think that we got the worst of it.

Thanks for the in depth reply and a good amount of context as well. Bear's strong attributes are really enticing but I think from what I'm understanding his physical shortcomings of size and speed are going to limit his ability somewhat. I think if he had more tools then I could see him being a good pair with Slavin but he just doesn't sound like a player that can probably handle 20+ minutes a night against tough competition. I do think if he can settle in with Skjei and form a Pinky and the Brain type understanding it could be a strong pairing.

So I'll post it again. Until proven otherwise this seems like the best realistic compromise on the D pairings.

Slavin - Pesce
Skjei - Bear
Cole - TDA

Let TDA feast on weak competition in limited but not necessarily miniscule minutes. He's excellent at pushing offense at 5 on 5 and have him work the powerplay. Have Cole be his babysitter and keep things the way they were on the PK.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad