GOilers88
#DustersWinCups
- Dec 24, 2016
- 14,442
- 21,278
If the GM is the one who puts and keeps his scouts in place, and those scouts identify good talent, then the GM absolutely deserves an equal amount of credit for providing a staff that is good at their job. Them personally following 300+ prospects is absolutely irrelevant to everything.No, by my logic, based on what I understand from how drafts work, the later picks are largely made because particular scout voice strong feelings toward the various players selected. The GM is due some credit, but the GM usually isn't heavily knowledgeable of all like 300+ available prospects.
Edit: Holland is due credit for creating space on the blueline for a Bear or Jones to thrive.
Let's contrast that to the OBC regime that was unable to identify, or hire any scouts that were able to identify real NHL talent on a year to year basis for like a decade. The GM deserves the blame in providing a shitty scouting staffmuch like he deserves credit for providing a good staff.