Erik Karlsson (Part 6)

Status
Not open for further replies.

NiWa

Registered User
Nov 27, 2003
390
464
Ireland
Karlsson was atrocious last night.
Corsi for % - 40%
Scoring Chance Percentage - 28.6%
Expected Goals For Percentage - 33.3%
Giveaways - 3
Takeaways - 0

Statistically, he was way worse than Meloche last night. He was by far the worst defenseman.

Actually, Karlsson may not have looked good, but Vlasic was worse statistically.
 

The Lewler

GOAT BUDGET AINEC
Jul 2, 2013
4,675
2,815
Eastern Ontario Badlands
Well for a fan of the truly sublime Orr to see anything good in Karlsson is surprising but as for "rewriting history" this is the same opinion I've been writing since the end of the first season (and of course being insulted no end by the board people here). Discounting the injury time in assessing his performance (which IS nevertheless a factor in his value to the team) I never saw a particularly valuable player when watching Karlsson on the ice. Occasionally he would make a pretty play but for the most part, his "offense, " i.e., points accumulated was a perfunctory correlate of his toi and his defense was really, really bad. I would not describe that as the "best defenseman in the league." When that phrase got tossed around it was mostly people seeing what they wanted to see on a night when he hadn't fallen on his face and embarrassed himself. And the whole league has in their book on him that it is not hard to skate around him and if you pressure him, he folds like wet crepe paper.

Ottawa was not looking at cap constraints. If Karlsson really was as good as everyone said at the time, he was the cornerstone of the team and you eat the shyte, bow to the blackmail, and re-sign him. They did not think he was worth hanging on to. Given that Wilson did get to see a full season of an unreliable and probably overrated player he should have known better than to sign him to the next contract but he did it anyway. And the team is MUCH worse because of it, both because Karlsson isn't doing his part and because they are limited in who they can hire to become a better team.

Sens fan coming in peace . I can’t fault your criticisms and won’t interject much here .

But for context , the actual scenario was Karlsson was not going to sign with Melnyk as the owner.

There was a bunch of smoke that summer about Alfredsson being in town and a new ownership group trying to buy the Sens . The reason the contract didn’t get done AND there was no trade demand was because Karlsson stalled for as long as possible waiting for that ownership change that never came .
 

Reggae Shark

Registered User
Sep 30, 2018
413
509
Thanks for coming in peace! I recently wandered in the Sens board after the Balcers pickup. I was astonished at how many of Sens fans seem to have poor attitudes toward SJS. Doesn't make sense considering you've had your share of embarrassment in recent years.
 

saskytaxi

Registered User
Feb 13, 2019
118
75
sasky
Karlsson definitely doesnt look the same as he did in ottawa. His stamina was the best in the show for a while. Dont know if its conditioning or injuries.

As for being overrated in ottawa lmao.

Also doesnt look like hes having any fun. Hope he turns in around though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adele Dazeem

hohosaregood

Banned
Sep 1, 2011
32,410
12,620
Karlsson definitely doesnt look the same as he did in ottawa. His stamina was the best in the show for a while. Dont know if its conditioning or injuries.

As for being overrated in ottawa lmao.

Also doesnt look like hes having any fun. Hope he turns in around though.
Who isn't overrated in Ottawa.
 

TomasHertlsRooster

Don’t say eye test when you mean points
May 14, 2012
33,360
25,417
Fremont, CA
Karlsson definitely doesnt look the same as he did in ottawa. His stamina was the best in the show for a while. Dont know if its conditioning or injuries.

As for being overrated in ottawa lmao.

Also doesnt look like hes having any fun. Hope he turns in around though.

It's kind of an inevitable conclusion. His presence was always heavily correlated with Ottawa allowing shots from close to the net (and goals) and not as correlated with Ottawa taking shots from close (and scoring) to the net as one may think. He had a negative goals for percentage relative to his teammates in like half of his seasons despite being on a weak team and receiving fairly favorable usage. Obviously he had a ton of talent and it translated to individual scoring but it didn't really translate to on-ice results or out-scoring the opposition as a whole.
 
  • Like
Reactions: saskytaxi

saskytaxi

Registered User
Feb 13, 2019
118
75
sasky
It's kind of an inevitable conclusion. His presence was always heavily correlated with Ottawa allowing shots from close to the net (and goals) and not as correlated with Ottawa taking shots from close (and scoring) to the net as one may think. He had a negative goals for percentage relative to his teammates in like half of his seasons despite being on a weak team and receiving fairly favorable usage. Obviously he had a ton of talent and it translated to individual scoring but it didn't really translate to on-ice results or out-scoring the opposition as a whole.
What are you talking about?
He gave sens a chance to win every single night. Should have a third norris.
 

Timos Death Stare

Seek and Destroy
Aug 9, 2008
3,831
77
CA
He was sucking wind today.... he is so out of shape.

for as much as he is paid, I wonder if/when someone in the org talks with him.

not like there is anything they can do at this point - he has his $$$
 

TheBeard

He fixes the cable?
Jul 12, 2019
15,143
16,545
Vegass
If at this point you have to talk to him about his play you may as well just cut him and take the 11 mil loss by playing youngsters.
 

Karl Prime

Registered User
Feb 13, 2017
4,601
4,340
His skating will never be the same and now he has to adjust to playing a different game than he did even in 208/19. He can't (or thinks he can't) join the rush as much because he can't get back as quick, and he can't take risks defensively because the foot speed isn't there like it used to (granted he's never been a great defensive skater but was a hell of a lot better than this). It sucks because even tonight, you see a little bit of the old guy with a few rushes up the ice but doubt that he's able to do that consistently anymore. Soon the offense will get going but defensively his best state is definitely on the PK now where mobility is less of an issue where he can focus on blocking shots and winning loose puck battles.

As for whether or not elite Karlsson led teams to success .... in 11-12 they don't make the playoffs without him exploding onto the scene. In 12-13 they only made it because of absurd goaltending after his injury. In 14-15 they don't make that miraculous run without his outstanding play - Hammond was great but Karlsson was the engine of the last 30 games that season. In 15-16 they aren't drafting 11th but 2nd-5th if he wasn't playing at the highest level almost every night. 16-17, well, we know what happened those playoffs, and the season was just as good. 18-19 when the Sharks got rolling in January there were many contributing factors but Erik was most certainly at the forefront of that.

Maybe, just maybe we'll see him play like he did in 18-19, but I doubt he can. He's a competitive guy though, and you can bet he's not happy with his level and wants that to change. Injuries suck and his injuries have come to his greatest asset, and there wasn't even anything he could do about it (Cooke, blocked shot). You have to wonder if he made a deal with the devil as a child to be blessed with the gifts to become an NHL superstar for the cost of a shooting star that burns out too fast.
 

Anomie2029

Registered User
Oct 10, 2013
3,867
4,038
Melbourne, Australia
His skating will never be the same and now he has to adjust to playing a different game than he did even in 208/19. He can't (or thinks he can't) join the rush as much because he can't get back as quick, and he can't take risks defensively because the foot speed isn't there like it used to (granted he's never been a great defensive skater but was a hell of a lot better than this). It sucks because even tonight, you see a little bit of the old guy with a few rushes up the ice but doubt that he's able to do that consistently anymore. Soon the offense will get going but defensively his best state is definitely on the PK now where mobility is less of an issue where he can focus on blocking shots and winning loose puck battles.

As for whether or not elite Karlsson led teams to success .... in 11-12 they don't make the playoffs without him exploding onto the scene. In 12-13 they only made it because of absurd goaltending after his injury. In 14-15 they don't make that miraculous run without his outstanding play - Hammond was great but Karlsson was the engine of the last 30 games that season. In 15-16 they aren't drafting 11th but 2nd-5th if he wasn't playing at the highest level almost every night. 16-17, well, we know what happened those playoffs, and the season was just as good. 18-19 when the Sharks got rolling in January there were many contributing factors but Erik was most certainly at the forefront of that.

Maybe, just maybe we'll see him play like he did in 18-19, but I doubt he can. He's a competitive guy though, and you can bet he's not happy with his level and wants that to change. Injuries suck and his injuries have come to his greatest asset, and there wasn't even anything he could do about it (Cooke, blocked shot). You have to wonder if he made a deal with the devil as a child to be blessed with the gifts to become an NHL superstar for the cost of a shooting star that burns out too fast.

He can join the rush, but like tonight shows - whenever he does, the forwards don't bother to cover him. Literally he had a shift where he broke it out, dumped, chased, stole the puck, and put the puck near the paint, and somehow forwards still got caught out and let a breakaway the other way. Another time he joins the rush, feeds it Labanc out wide and heads towards net on a 3 on 2 - but Labanc just panic flings a muffin on net before giving anyone a chance to get to the net.
 

TheWayToRefJose

Registered User
Oct 30, 2017
3,478
3,165
After today at 5 on 5:
Corsi - 36%
Scoring Chance for: 26%
Goals for Percent: 0%
xGF - 29%
High Danger Chances for - 29%

At least on the bright side Vlasic, Karlsson, and Burns are all in top 5 of Expected Goals against! Elite.

That 32.5% of the cap is performing very well.
 

Lebanezer

I'unno? Coast Guard?
Jul 24, 2006
14,818
10,430
San Jose
If Karlsson were a stuff teddy bear.

giphy.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad