Shootertooter
Registered User
- Feb 20, 2016
- 3,676
- 1,487
Anyone think that with Ott. shipping Hoffman out this morning they might try to keep Karlsson around?
Probably not, but Erik Karlsson probably will.So what do people think... Will Karlsson still get traded?
Anyone think that with Ott. shipping Hoffman out this morning they might try to keep Karlsson around?
My offer would be:
Colorado gets: Erik Karlsson, Bobby Ryan
Ottawa gets: Ottawa 2019 1st round pick, Colorado 2019 first round pick, Samuel Girard or Cale Makar, JT Compher.
Not really.I think Colorado makes almost too much sense
An up and coming team, with strong young forward core but a deficient blue line,
Anyone think that with Ott. shipping Hoffman out this morning they might try to keep Karlsson around?
I think Colorado makes almost too much sense.
An up and coming team, with strong young forward core but a deficient blue line, that could use 27 y old during his prime in the next 9 years (next year + 8 y contract afterwards)... and the only team that can give Ottawa back that valuable 2019 1st round pick of what will most likely constitute a tank year.
My offer would be:
Colorado gets: Erik Karlsson, Bobby Ryan
Ottawa gets: Ottawa 2019 1st round pick, Colorado 2019 first round pick, Samuel Girard or Cale Makar, JT Compher
Colorado has the cap space to absorb those contracts, with nobody except Rantanen with big raises expected for a few years (especially if Girard is the one traded). It is a high price, but generational 27 y old are rarely available, and he probably won't be available for long if he refuses that contract from Ottawa come July 1st... Price will be high.
If we take on Bobby Ryan my offer would be: 1st COL 2019, 1st OTT back + Timmins + Prospect
No way Girard or Makar, let alone Compher if we take on Bobby Ryan.
Or maybe another 3-way-trade will get it done...
Not really.
As much as MacKinnon and Rantanen make their forward core seem solid, the depth isn’t there, and they don’t currently have the prospects to ensure that secondary scoring.
Their D is actually one of their bigger strengths. The depth players they have play better than advertised, and they have several very promising prospects to add to that depth in the coming years
Secondary scoring is easily their biggest weakness, with a long term solution at goalie being their second biggest one
I’d also respectfully disagreeRespectfully disagree, here. Nothing against Barberio, Siemens and Nemeth, but having them playing significant minutes on your team is not a good sign.
If they are smart, they will resign Varlamov and keep Bernier around. Don't see that as a real problem. Secondary scoring is pretty good, with cheap young players like Kerfoot, Jost and Andrighetto having potential to get better.
Defense is by far Colorado's main weakness in my opinion... And I don't see Girard or Makar becoming close of what Karlsson is, so I would pull the trigger. The only way Colorado regrets this is if that Ottawa first wins the lottery and lands Jack Hugues, but it is statistically more likely it won't happen, even if they finish dead last.
Respectfully disagree, here. Nothing against Barberio, Siemens and Nemeth, but having them playing significant minutes on your team is not a good sign.
If they are smart, they will resign Varlamov and keep Bernier around. Don't see that as a real problem. Secondary scoring is pretty good, with cheap young players like Kerfoot, Jost and Andrighetto having potential to get better.
Defense is by far Colorado's main weakness in my opinion... And I don't see Girard or Makar becoming close of what Karlsson is, so I would pull the trigger. The only way Colorado regrets this is if that Ottawa first wins the lottery and lands Jack Hugues, but it is statistically more likely it won't happen, even if they finish dead last.
If they are smart, they will resign Varlamov and keep Bernier around. Don't see that as a real problem. Secondary scoring is pretty good, with cheap young players like Kerfoot, Jost and Andrighetto having potential to get better.
Not sure I agree with this. Kerfoot's 1st half of the season was great but he was pretty much a 4th liner by february. Jost is definitely showing potential but isn't guaranteed to become a legit #2 next season. Besides that, I don't see any other secondary scoring good enough to make defense a bigger concern. Barrie is one of the best offensive d's in the league, Zadorov is a legit top 2 D imo. Johnson is criminally underrated on here and Girard is a gem with wheels and great hockey IQ. Our biggest issue is not having an answer when the other team shuts down the top line. Having Karlsson would be great but we could do better w/o him than we could w/o some offensive depth.
I think Colorado makes almost too much sense.
An up and coming team, with strong young forward core but a deficient blue line, that could use 27 y old during his prime in the next 9 years (next year + 8 y contract afterwards)... and the only team that can give Ottawa back that valuable 2019 1st round pick of what will most likely constitute a tank year.
My offer would be:
Colorado gets: Erik Karlsson, Bobby Ryan
Ottawa gets: Ottawa 2019 1st round pick, Colorado 2019 first round pick, Samuel Girard or Cale Makar, JT Compher
Colorado has the cap space to absorb those contracts, with nobody except Rantanen with big raises expected for a few years (especially if Girard is the one traded). It is a high price, but generational 27 y old are rarely available, and he probably won't be available for long if he refuses that contract from Ottawa come July 1st... Price will be high.
Yup.Anyone think that with Ott. shipping Hoffman out this morning they might try to keep Karlsson around?
I like Barrie too, but Zadorov is no way a "top 2 D", even if he plays with him. Even on Colorado he is behind Nemeth (!) in ice time... It is like saying Jason Demers is a top 2 D because he plays with Ekman-Larsson... and at least Demers plays some time on the PP.
Maybe the secondary scoring is also a concern, but I would not say that makes Colorado's defense a strenghth. Having Karlsson would not be just great, it would be incredible for that team. Anyways, might not be the best timing, but those guys are never available so it is my opinion that you have to go for them if you have the assets when they are. Can't wait to see where he lands, and I predict that team is going to benefit a lot from having a special talent like that in their line-up!
Yup.
If anything it increases substantially. They moved on quick from Hoffman, once the media got the info....
I’d also respectfully disagree
Johnson is a workhorse. Barrie is a top pairing offensive defenseman. Zadorov is top 4 defensive dman. Girard is borderline top 4, and shows every sign of being one from now on
After that Nemeth is typically better than most claim. He’s excellent in a 3rd pairing role, but good enough to take top 4 minutes if someone gets injured. After that, the depth is plenty good for the 6th and 7th dman roles.
Then you have Makar, Timmins, and Meloche all seeming to having a good chance of being top 4 or top pairing quality
Add to that, a good amount of that would be expansion protected.
Compared to secondary scoring, the number of assets are similar, but there are more roles to fill, the gap between ability and potential appears larger for those holding those roles now
As for goalie, Varlamov is not a long term solution. He’s too old and injury prone to be the goalie to rely on when the team aims to be contenders in a few years
It’s not as pressing if a concern, just an ever growing one
Sort of seems like you take the absolute most pessimistic approach to most every one of thoseLike I wrote to the other poster, maybe secondary scoring is a need for the Avalanche, but it does not make the defense situation better. I agree with your assessment of Zadorov (#4 defensive D), Girard (up and coming but not top 4 yet) and Nemeth (bottom 6 D). Erik Johnson might be a "workhorse" but that does not make him a top 30 defenseman in the league so I would hesitate to label him as a #1 defenseman; he is a 30 y old all-around top 2D, which is still valuable. I like Barrie more than most, though.
I disagree with Meloche "having good chance of being top 4". Has he not been demoted 2 times in the ECHL last year or am I missing something here? Looks like a dime-a-dozen D prospect.
As for Timmins and Makar, if everything goes perfectly in their development, they might be in the NHL in 2 years, and start making a real impact in 3-4 years... Not really what I would call immediate help for that roster.
Anyways, I still consider Colorado's defense to be one of the league weakest, but I might be wrong. Does not make the team less promising, but I still don't think their defense is a strenght.