I mean, the short answer is that he's not as good as you think he is.I guess so but then I would argue why did they sit on him for so long and loan him out?
Better than the guys you had and have thoI mean, the short answer is that he's not as good as you think he is.
The long answer is that his best attribute is his attitude and his ability to stop penalties. The latter is not as useful in a club season and the former is less evident when you're not already the starter.
At being born in the right country, certainly.Better than the guys you had and have tho
This is why I called West Ham’s penalty soft
Picture doesn't do it justice though, he got his shot off no problem and dove big time when he shanked it.
Yeah disagree. He was put off balance/off stride. He was able to get to the ball, but "no problem" is about as big of a stretch as his shirt.
So what you're saying is that contact doesn't matter if the player is able to stay on his feet? Alternatively, when Bowen goes to ground because he's off balance and unable to finish his attack despite his ability to take a couple steps, does that count?He throws his arms out and goes to ground on his own. This has been a constant problem with him, when he feels contact he will never try and fight through it.
How is that remotely what he said lolSo what you're saying is that contact doesn't matter if the player is able to stay on his feet?
That isn't what I said.So what you're saying is that contact doesn't matter if the player is able to stay on his feet?
Well the clear contact didn't matter because he went to ground himself. The pull put him off balance/stride and affected Pulisic's ability to finish the play.How is that remotely what he said lol
Not directly, but there's not really another conclusion. The whole point you made is that Pulisic could fight through contact and still make a play on the ball despite his balance and timing being off due to a clear foul. So if affecting someone's balance and timing isn't what matters, what does? The only thing I've seen you say as a reason it isn't a penalty is because he went to ground himself.That isn't what I said.
The determining factor is if the contact is a foul and denies the goalscoring opportunity. If Pulisic doesn't immediately flail and throw himself when the contact is made, and instead pushes through, the goalscoring opportunity is not denied because the pull wasn't long or hard enough to be anything more than an inconvenience.Well the clear contact didn't matter because he went to ground himself. The pull put him off balance/stride and affected Pulisic's ability to finish the play.
So clearly, if a player can stay on his feet and doesn't, that's the determinative factor.
Not directly, but there's not really another conclusion. The whole point you made is that Pulisic could fight through contact and still make a play on the ball despite his balance and timing being off due to a clear foul.
Ridiculous signing. We bring him in to appease Tuchel right before we fire Tuchel.Auba reeks and anyone could’ve told you that before Chelsea inexplicably signed him
But then the same can be said about Bowen. That's my point.His balance and timing could equally be thrown off by a light shoulder-to-shoulder bump, and what isn't a penalty either. Players need to be strong on their feet and control their space.
Yeah, I didn't see us having a genuine keeper controversy this year, but Mendy hasn't been as good as previous seasons and Kepa has been the guy they hoped he was when we signed him.Kepa having a real renaissance season.