Whatever you need to tell yourself so you can move on bud.Look the trade would never happen from the Canucks POV and Minny fans wouldn't do the trade either if the teams each player played for was reversed and everyone here knows it.
Whatever you need to tell yourself so you can move on bud.Look the trade would never happen from the Canucks POV and Minny fans wouldn't do the trade either if the teams each player played for was reversed and everyone here knows it.
The same tage who hasn’t done jack squat? lol okay dude. Bedard sucks on D and isn’t as hype as ignorant people like you are making him out to be. Stop being a joke and showing your casual hate about wild players
Yes he would. STOPJEE wouldn’t even be a 2C on some teams. Minnesota fans have become a bit too wild.
Whatever I could post a poll as to which player is better and it would get shut down like as soon as any moderator looked at the results but it's not worth my time.Whatever you need to tell yourself so you can move on bud.
It’s just amusing that you need assurance when I already said EP was a better player. Wreaks of insecurity.Whatever I could post a poll as to which player is better and it would get shut down like as soon as any moderator looked at the results but it's not worth my time.
I'm wasting my time elsewhere on this site.
More like 35-40% better player lmfao.Probably why he is about to get a 229% bigger AAV than Ek while being maybe a 10-15% better player.
Eriksson Ek is pretty solidly at point per game when he’s not playing with the likes of Foligno and Greenway. In a salary cap world, a player’s value is impacted by their AAV.
I said “some”, which is one or more teams. You think he would beat out McDavid/Drai, Pettersson/Miller, Hughes/Hischier, etc.?Yes he would. STOP
I think he would be the 2nd line C for most of the teams you mentioned, while other players would be moved to wingI said “some”, which is one or more teams. You think he would beat out McDavid/Drai, Pettersson/Miller, Hughes/Hischier, etc.?
Make a poll if people would rather have EP at $12.5M for 8 years or Ek at $5.25M for 5 years.Whatever I could post a poll as to which player is better and it would get shut down like as soon as any moderator looked at the results but it's not worth my time.
I'm wasting my time elsewhere on this site.
You’re usually wrong, so this post is pretty on brand.More like 35-40% better player lmfao
I always love it when someone who doesn't know me tells me what I need, good day.It’s just amusing that you need assurance when I already said EP was a better player. Wreaks of insecurity.
I mean, it’s pretty obvious.I always love it when someone who doesn't know me tells me what I need, good day.
I guess 2 things here come to mind.Make a poll if people would rather have EP at $12.5M for 8 years or Ek at $5.25M for 5 years.
Seriously dude you don't even exist to me I'm a hockey fan and have a real life I don't come here for validation, just to express hockey viewpoints and shoot the shit, get over yourself you are just being rude now and it's a bad look.I mean, it’s pretty obvious.
You can’t handle that SOME Wild fans would prefer Ek+$7M in free cap as compared to a $12M Pettersson. It’s just comical to me at this point.Seriously dude you don't even exist to me I'm a hockey fan and have a real life I don't come here for validation, just to express hockey viewpoints and shoot the shit, get over yourself you are just being rude now and it's a bad look.
I can handle it, I just think it's faulty logic but feel free.You can’t handle that SOME Wild fans would prefer Ek+$7M in free cap as compared to a $12M Pettersson. It’s just comical to me at this point.
You already have that player regardless of what EEK's contract is so again where is the extra advantage in salary cap savings?Your “hockey viewpoints” lack critical thinking. Even the above response to Spurgeon in your quoted post lacks critical thinking. We can’t count our ELC contract, one that is looking like a #1D, needing to be re-signed as a reason to want that extra $7M in cap?
The thing is that EP40 has produced with a revolving door of players over the 3 way time frame and he drives play, EEK's scoring is very dependent.Again, your posts are just twisting things to try and get Wild fans to agree with you. Nobody has said Ek is better than EP. But when you finally see Ek be given real linemates, not chumps like Foligno/Greenway/Johansson, and he’s in the middle of a 29 point run in 21 games, it just makes the scenario not make ANY sense from a MINNESOTA POV. I’d rather let it play out and see if we have a 90 point guy at $5.25M than trade him for a 100 point guy making $12M+. Is that starting to make sense?
Maybe it's just me but in any argument I like to look at the strengths and weaknesses of both sides as objectively as possible knowing that I'm human but I understand that alot of people don't look at things that way.You keep insisting that Minnesota fans see it from the Vancouver POV, but won’t look at it from a Minnesota POV. $14.7M in dead cap again next year. We BARELY made it work this year due to injuries to big AAV players (Spurgeon, Brodin, Boldy).
Well then he is probably the better player and then most teams wouldn't trade him for EEK one would think right?Vancouver should keep EP. That makes sense to their franchise. Nobody is disagreeing with that.
Yes, continue to use the time where Ek had to carry Foligno and Greenway. Is everything everyone else says always in one ear and out the other with you?I can handle it, I just think it's faulty logic but feel free.
just for fun I looked up the stats for the last 2 seasons and this one and just for centers EP40 is 6th in points and honestly I was surprised at how low EEK was at 38th
NHL Stats
The official source for NHL Stats including skaters, goalies, teams stats and more.www.nhl.com
Sure EEK makes up some of that difference with his 2 way play but it's not like eP40 is running on empty stats here either.
Because when you have the extremely large contracts and those ELCs come due for a raise, guess where those players go (hint: BYE BYE). The extra advantage is you don't lose your quality 2nd-3rd line players over paying someone $7M more.You already have that player regardless of what EEK's contract is so again where is the extra advantage in salary cap savings?
The whole argument of the extra savings in cap space is what can that team do with that cap space, ie signing of an asset they don't already have.
I don't believe you.Also I frankly don't care if Wild fans disagree or not, I'm not a tribal poster but a hockey fan first and foremost.
Is crying that EP is better and that Minnesota fans should look at it from a Vancouver perspective really looking at it from both sides lol? That's some incredible gaslighting you just did there.Maybe it's just me but in any argument I like to look at the strengths and weaknesses of both sides as objectively as possible knowing that I'm human but I understand that alot of people don't look at things that way.
Who exactly was blocking EEK?Yes, continue to use the time where Ek had to carry Foligno and Greenway. Is everything everyone else says always in one ear and out the other with you?
Well I guess NHL GMS that pay there superstars get burned then eh?Because when you have the extremely large contracts and those ELCs come due for a raise, guess where those players go (hint: BYE BYE). The extra advantage is you don't lose your quality 2nd-3rd line players over paying someone $7M more.
Well I am but seriously I don't care what you believe or not.I don't believe you.
Well I kind of assumed that you were looking at it from the Minny perspective already.Is crying that EP is better and that Minnesota fans should look at it from a Vancouver perspective really looking at it from both sides lol? That's some incredible gaslighting you just did there.
You're still stuck in the you think I think Ek is better than EP. Like, you're functionally incapable of understanding what I'm saying.Who exactly was blocking EEK?
Also he certainly wasn't playing with those guys on the PP the last 3 years right?
EP40 has played with better players at times but he drives play way more than EEK.
How's Edmonton doing? They've got the best player on the planet at $12.5M. They must be winning the Cup every other year, right?Well I guess NHL GMS that pay there superstars get burned then eh?
You're still stuck in the you think I think Ek is better than EP. Like, you're functionally incapable of understanding what I'm saying.
Well they have gone farther in the playoffs the last 2 years so there is that.How's Edmonton doing? They've got the best player on the planet at $12.5M. They must be winning the Cup every other year, right?
I won't respond to the rest of your post and simply refer you to the first point in this post.
So you just ramble on about EP being better than Eriksson Ek in every post for no reason. That actually seems about right.that's funny because I never said that you said that right?
So you just ramble on about EP being better than Eriksson Ek in every post for no reason.
That actually seems about right.
The issue with this is, they needed quality depth to help them go farther in the playoffs. They had 4 point per game players and 3 100+ point players.Well they have gone farther in the playoffs the last 2 years so there is that.
And while it's a bit of a cliché there is that saying that teams go as far as their good players go but the Oilers did run into the eventual SC champions and couldn't get a bounce in the 3rd period against Vegas and Jonathan Marchessault had his bet and luckiest period ever.
Skinner not so much even though I think he can become a winning SC goalie.