KL14
Registered User
- Oct 25, 2011
- 394
- 0
Money is part of it
You talk money and it seems OJC must have a lot of it....two complete set of uniforms, including pants and helmets...I am not sure if Junior A teams even have this !
You need to give OJC credit for great fund raising. Each of the sweater boards hanging in their rink has a sponsor's name attached to it, and their game program must have 20 to 30 companies listed. You cannot fault a team that gets out in the Community and taps the local businesses for support.
However, all of the teams in the Metro dominated the Valley this year and I can't imagine that all of teams have the money that it seems the OJC has. It must be, as suggested, the player pool, and because of the player pool I think, on average, the Metro teams carry players that are older to fill their roster.
Renfrew and Arnprior both carried 4 16 year olds this year, as well as Stittsville, Perth I think had two or maybe three. The Valley teams also had a number of 17 year olds as well.
When I looked at the OJC line up the other night, they carry no 16 year olds, and I think only 2 or 3 17 year olds...most of the line up is made up of 19 and 20 year olds. I am not sure how the other Metro teams break down on demographics (Gatineau for sure is an older team due the rules about junior hockey in Quebec). I am not suggesting there is anything wrong with carrying an older team as it is all within the rules. Several of the CCHL teams, like Nepean, have the same philosophy. go with players that are older and you will always win.
You talk money and it seems OJC must have a lot of it....two complete set of uniforms, including pants and helmets...I am not sure if Junior A teams even have this !
You need to give OJC credit for great fund raising. Each of the sweater boards hanging in their rink has a sponsor's name attached to it, and their game program must have 20 to 30 companies listed. You cannot fault a team that gets out in the Community and taps the local businesses for support.
However, all of the teams in the Metro dominated the Valley this year and I can't imagine that all of teams have the money that it seems the OJC has. It must be, as suggested, the player pool, and because of the player pool I think, on average, the Metro teams carry players that are older to fill their roster.
Renfrew and Arnprior both carried 4 16 year olds this year, as well as Stittsville, Perth I think had two or maybe three. The Valley teams also had a number of 17 year olds as well.
When I looked at the OJC line up the other night, they carry no 16 year olds, and I think only 2 or 3 17 year olds...most of the line up is made up of 19 and 20 year olds. I am not sure how the other Metro teams break down on demographics (Gatineau for sure is an older team due the rules about junior hockey in Quebec). I am not suggesting there is anything wrong with carrying an older team as it is all within the rules. Several of the CCHL teams, like Nepean, have the same philosophy. go with players that are older and you will always win.