The loss of Emelin has highlighted his importance, he's a UFA not RFA, salaries are escalating and seem to be disproportionately doing so for defenceman.
That's my argument to support largely a guess on a player with a unique history. I think his salary starts with a $4.xM
Edit: Josh Gorges got $3.9M in a similar status, how does Emelin stack up?
Emelin is probably better, but after the Desharnais disaster we can't afford to sign another contract like that one... Desharnais got that contract because he "deserved" it, he was pretty good that season...
i think him being injured was actually a blessing in disguise, now we can lock him up for cheaper
so much potential
i would say 3.3M/4 years
It will only be a blessing if Bergevin doesn't wait until Emelin comes back for a good stretch of games and plays great again. He needs to take advantage of the injury and leave Newport agency with too small a sample size to prove he's worth a lot. Don Meehan ALWAYS gets the most money for his clients.
Gorges had 5 complete season with the habs, and over 400 NHL games at the time he signed his extension.
Emelin played 105 games in the NHL, got surgery and was out for the last 6 months or so! 2.5M MAXIMUM, 2 years maximum, then we'll be able to judge what he's worth
EDIT : okay maybe 3M
Contracts are forward looking, they mostly take into account what future impact is anticipated to be. I think Emelin > Gorges in that regard.
Gorges had a major knee surgery before his deal. Markov had a major surgery and was off considerable time and got a market value deal.
If Emelin signs for $2.5M it's the steal of the century, so I don't think that's where he'll land.
Also, some players are thought to be a threat to going to the KHL, with Emelin there is a real and present danger of that happening. He'll have more than 30 teams competing for him next July.
I really only have a problem with "signing a contract based on anticipation", especially in the case of Bergevin who signed Desharnais (and Moen, if i'm not mistaken?) based on anticipation that was based on a short sample of what they could do
it's the 105 NHL games that bugs me, I need to see more, I want to see if he can keep it up in a full 82 game season
I would not wait at all. He's a newport client, and if you give them an inch they'll take a mile. I'd hammer out a deal before he shows again just how important he is to the club. Anything below 4 million a year over 4 years would be a steal i think. He hasn't even had a chance to show his offensive potential, which i think is definitely there.
I wouldn't give Emelin anything over $3M right now. He may or may not be worth more... let him come back and play first, I say. There should be no rush... unless you can get him at a bargain.
Anything under 3.5 is a steal. Cap is going to be 80 mil in 2-3 years.
I'm curious why do you think so. I've heard others give similar opinions.
It doesn't make any sense to me at all.
I am not a numbers guy but think about this. Subban will cost over 7mil next season, that will probably cost us Emelin or Markov (who I think has a couple more good years left). With young prospects like Beaulieu, Tinordi, Dietz, Thrower, Ellis in the pipeline, is it possible Habs deal Subban? I am in no way advocating it but for whatever reason the spotlight is always on this kid, good or bad, usually unfounded. Habs could land some serious talent for him. He is my favorite Hab but somehow I don't see him in Montreal long term.
Emelin as at worst a great #3 dman.
Reasonable 3-4 is likely best case scenario. Still brings what thisAt worst? You're dreaming.
This will cause the cap to go up to 80 ?