Eli had a .500 record as a starter. The Super Bowl rings matter, but he shouldn't be in the Hall of Fame. I'm sure that he will be though.
I've said it before, but Eli was Jay Cutler with better body language, better health and a horseshoe up his ass.
Obviously Eli played a lot longer so his raw numbers are much higher, but on a per game basis, they were the same damn guy.
Cutler
74-79 W-L
62 comp %
4.9 TD%
3.3 INT%
7.0 Y/A
229.6 ypg
85.3 Rating
Eli
116-116
60.3 comp%
4.5 TD%
3.0 Int%
7.0 Y/A
241.6 ypg
84.1 rating
Jay Cutler was better both on the numbers and eye test. He also would have had a ring if he didn't get murdered against Green Bay. Jay Cutler is also most certainly not a Hall of Famer.
I also wonder if people even remember how the Giants got to the first of those Super Bowls. They had an amazing defensive line and forced teams to throw away the ball. Eli wasn't particularly great in those games himself.
2007-08
TB: 185 yards, 2 TD's
DAL: 163 yards, 2 TD's
GB: 21-40, 251 yards, 0 TD's
He didn't throw a pick in any of those games and that's his claim to fame. In the Super Bowl he threw one and David Tyree had a miracle catch of a terribly thrown ball. It has always been very confusing to me as to why Eli got credit for this playoff run. Their defense deserves all the credit. People should look at the stats that the other QB's were putting up in the games against the Giants.
Now, the second time around, he does absolutely deserve credit and I won't take it away from him, but that's one Super Bowl. The first time around he was a game manager, and players shouldn't get in the Hall of Fame based on that. The rest of his career outside of those Super Bowl seasons was mediocrity and nothing but.