He's saying we have been giving the organization the benefit of the doubt and allowing for a excuses for too long. They have been writing off entire seasons because they say it isn't worth trading away prospects that fit into their plan for the future. Except that the future isn't guaranteed, not to mention the culture of losing as not only seeped in, but taken over.
They've created a reputation of being a joke. Good luck getting quality UFAs to come here without a gross overpayment.
There should be more urgency. they need to treat this year as just as important as 2017-18. Future success is not a guarantee.
What will they do if they go 5-10-3 in the first month? my guess is they fold up tent and concentrate on scouting Juniors, like they have for half a decade.
Thanks, I couldn't have said it better myself.
Are you saying it should be easy to get a second line center? That even tho all teams run with at least a few unproven roster spots Edmonton shouldnt have to?
I'm not sure I'm saying it's easy, but I'm saying it should be
expected.
Let's look at the 8 playoff teams in the West from last season heading into this one:
1. Getzlaf - Kesler
2. Duchene - MacKinnon/O'Reilly
3. Backes - Stastny
4. Thornton - Pavelski/Couture/Marleau
5. Toews - Richards
6. Kopitar - Carter
7. Granlund - Koivu
8. Seguin - Spezza
I see about one or two centers out of the 16 that are better (
next season) than RNH. Over half these teams were once sitting near the basement of the NHL not too long ago. It didn't take the 8-10 years we'll have waited
if Draisaitl pans out in 3 years.
That fans should expect a roster full of proven vets and never need to develop from within?
Well that's a bit extreme. I don't see why both of those ideas need to be married together. Yes, I do expect, after 5-7 years, that our professional hockey team will have proven players
in key positions. It's NOT too much to ask, after this long, to have a #1C, #2C, top pairing defenceman, and proven goalie. Right now we have 1/4 of those.
Again, let's look
1. Gibson/Andersen
2. Varlamov
3. Elliott/Allen
4. Niemi
5. Cawford
6. Quick
7. Harding/Kuemper
8. Lehtonen
Of the 8 teams, I would say Minnesota and Anaheim is about on par with us, and the Blues are weaker. However, the Blues have the best defence in hockey, so yeah. I'm not too worried about goaltending heading into the season. I have high hopes that one of Scrivens or Fasth will have a breakout year.
1. Fowler
2. E. Johnson
3. Pietrangelo
4. Burns
5. Keith
6. Doughty
7. Suter
8. Goligoski
Obviously none of our d-men are close to any of these. Most of those teams have a 2nd defenceman that are better than any one of ours as well.
That our current prospects are junk and don't deserve a shot?
I've never been against developing prospects. Thing is, we haven't really developed one in the 6 years since Sam Gagner to play a full-season besides our #1 picks. Realistically it takes about 3 seasons for a 3rd overall center to make an impact for his team if he pans out.
At what point though, have you decided you've waited long enough for our prospects to pan out? Remember when Nilsson-Cogliano-Gagner was our top line of the future? Remember when Colton Teubert was going to be a 2nd pairing d-man? Remember when PRV-Lander-Hartikainen were going to be an awesome 3rd line by last year? Or when Hamilton and Pitlick were going to be 2nd line power forwards?
We've been sold on waiting for prospects to develop for an eternity. At some point enough is enough. I've reached that point, clearly you haven't. But I'd rather not have to wait another 3 years for Draisaitl and Nurse for them to maybe reach their potential. As I said earlier, the other teams have figured it out, leave it to our highly-paid management team to. It's their job, not ours.