I have read a lot of Oilolers takes, but I have seen very few people point out the high probability that the team and the player had a handshake agreement that the signing bonus was only a formality due to the cap, and the 10 games were guaranteed to Brown by the org.
We see teams exploit performance bonuses for cap management all the team. The reason it is obvious that this was a handshake agreement to give him the bonus is because of the structure. If there were actual concerns about durability, they would have selected a more appropriate GP benchmark. If there were concerns about performance, they would have selected an actual performance based benchmark like goals or points.
If they agreed to use the bonus to work with the cap limits this season, and they guaranteed it to him, they would be idiotic to screw him. It would do more damage in the long-run to screw a veteran player out of millions of dollars.
Not to mention, if there was a handshake agreement about both sides complicity agreeing to a soft performance bonus benchmark to "manage" the Oilers salary cap, and the Oilers refused to give Brown his 10th game, you have to imagine there would be some sort of push back from Brown, the NHLPA, and then possibly the league. As we in Ottawa know, the league hates to look bad! The league is fine with certain loopholes, but they want honour among thieves. Teams managing the cap with paper performance bonuses has never been an issue, but the moment a team screws a player on a paper bonus that they had a handshake agreement to give them in order to circumvent the cap, then it becomes a shit circus.
When I use the word guarantee, I do not mean in a legal sense. I mean two sides shaking hands and having the understanding that they are exploiting a cap loophole for mutual benefit, and that short of Brown suffering a season ending injury, he will be given 10 games.