the reasoning behind the deal makes sense, but what doesn't make sense is at that aav it should be 3 years.
What difference does the extra year make? He'd still be a UFA at the end. At three years, he becomes a UFA the same season as Klefbom... so 50% of our top four and arguably our two best defenders in the same year.
Moreover an 8 year contract for a 26 year old defender (from 26 to 34) is likely to be less expensive than an 8 year contract for a 24 year old top-2 defender. The former gets a bit of a discount on the tail end, while the latter is paying for "prime" the entire time... or worse yet in this case... the
projection of what prime might be.
Let's put some numbers around it:
Current case: 5.6 - 5.6 - 7 - 7 - 7 - 7 - 7 - 7 - 7 - 7 and he's a UFA at age 34, meaning he's going to be on a shorter "twilight" deal
Big deal now: 7 - 7 - 7 - 7 - 7 - 7 - 7 - 7 ... and he's a UFA at age 32 again, meaning he's going to command "still prime coin"
You know-it-alls have it all figured out, but have failed to put any thought into the actual situation at play here. Such shrewd negotiators you are while sitting in a bubble.