KillerMillerTime
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2019
- 7,366
- 6,020
You don't, you just smack both of them in the head and tell them to do better
He needs to challenge them for sure.
You don't, you just smack both of them in the head and tell them to do better
Exactly, some of these lineup suggestions are ridiculous: sit Chara , put Vladar in , bench Krug as if Cassidy is seriously going to consider any of them .You don't, you just smack both of them in the head and tell them to do better
He’s right there with him. hedman now isn’t hedman of 3-4 years ago.
I said what I said but to be more clear...The grass is greener everywhere else in some peoples eyes. TB has a decent, balanced D. They are not infallible. And Hedman isn’t The end all/be all of defenseman.
Exactly, some of these lineup suggestions are ridiculous: sit Chara , put Vladar in , bench Krug as if Cassidy is seriously going to consider any of them .
Hedman has been great in this series but we’ve only played two games . Charlie has time to get better and he will . Let’s decide who’s better when the series is over .Go blow hedman in the TB threads. They’ll
Love ya for it.
He’s right there with him. hedman now isn’t hedman of 3-4 years ago.
I said what I said but to be more clear...The grass is greener everywhere else in some peoples eyes. TB has a decent, balanced D. They are not infallible. And Hedman isn’t The end all/be all of defenseman.
This is the whole problem - they have 2.5 smurf d-men (Clifton's half a smurf), all three of whom belong on a third pairing (along with Chara). Right now, without Lauzon and with Carlo playing so poorly with Krug, you have all of one decent defensive d-man (Mac, obviously). And that, my friends, is a recipe for disaster. That and useless wingers outside of Marchy and Pasta. Team has one line, three centres and one d-man. Anyone for shinny?How do you break up Krug Carlo and have Gryz play with McAvoy?
Chara can’t play with Carlo except on the PK.
Go blow hedman in the TB threads. They’ll
Love ya for it.
And only yesterday, I thought we were Cup contenders . One game doesn’t define a series . Let’s see how it plays out .This is the whole problem - they have 2.5 smurf d-men (Clifton's half a smurf), all three of whom belong on a third pairing (along with Chara). Right now, without Lauzon and with Carlo playing so poorly with Krug, you have all of one decent defensive d-man (Mac, obviously). And that, my friends' is a recipe for disaster. That and useless wingers outside of Marchy and Pasta. Team has one line, three centres and one d-man. Anyone for shinny?
And only yesterday, I thought we were Cup contenders . One game doesn’t define a series . Let’s see how it plays out .
And only yesterday, I thought we were Cup contenders . One game doesn’t define a series . Let’s see how it plays out .
Yeah? See the post immediately below yours.And only yesterday, I thought we were Cup contenders . One game doesn’t define a series . Let’s see how it plays out .
He's a #1. Problem is there's no 1B. Yet.This team needs a legitimate number one defenseman. Someone with size. McAvoy is a 1A.
What does that tell us ? As bad as the Bruins played tonight , I didn’t see them giving Tampa a ton of good looks . Tampa was controlling the play , for sure but for the most part we’re on the perimeter. Only some colossal f***ups by the D gave them the quality chances that they had .Yeah? See the post immediately below yours.
Yeah? See the post immediately below yours.
No Stamkos and McDonagh and Coburn/Schenn
hurt their team less than your 2nd pair. That's
a lost opportunity.
They were dominated. The D wasn't just a disaster, it *is* a disaster. And tb didn't need many good looks, all they had to do was fling the puck towards the net a couple of times.What does that tell us ? As bad as the Bruins played tonight , I didn’t see them giving Tampa a ton of good looks . Tampa was controlling the play , for sure but for the most part we’re on the perimeter. Only some colossal f***ups by the D gave them the quality chances that they had .
Yeah so have I. The problem is Tampa didn't lose.you referring to being outshot?
His point is still valid. The fandom rises with every win and gets demoralized with every loss.
saw some great bruins teams lose in the 70s to teams they outshot badly. Anything can happen.
Nothing wrong with well placed optimism.
If you want me to agree that Tampa was the better team tonight , I certainly agree with you , I just don’t think it’s all gloom and doom as you make it out to be . Let’s get back on track tomorrow.They were dominated. The D wasn't just a disaster, it *is* a disaster. And tb didn't need many good looks, all they had to do was fling the puck towards the net a couple of times.
However, you are right: despite being completely outplayed they still had more scoring chances. Just couldn't finish. Jeez, when have I heard that before?
Yeah, I'll be perfectly back on track tomorrow, and perfectly optimistic in the morning, but tonight I'll be pissed-off.If you want me to agree that Tampa was the better team tonight , I certainly agree with you , I just don’t think it’s all gloom and doom as you make it out to be . Let’s get back on track tomorrow.
Yeah so have I. The problem is Tampa didn't lose.
Edit: and I'll be perfectly optimistic in the morning. Tonight I'm pissed-off.