Would never expect Wheeling to be ahead of the game on anything.
Does anyone think we will see in increase in the 50 contract limit for NHL teams? I think they would need to increase that number if the ECHL is going to be a true development league and not just a league with a sprinkling of NHL contracted players.
I think the ECHL wants to be a true developmental league. It is yet to be seen if the NHL really wants that.
I think the ECHL wants to be a true developmental league. It is yet to be seen if the NHL really wants that.
NHL teams that own their AHL affiliates are becoming more aware of the importance / value of having a strong ECHL affiliate. Yes, the AHL team's primary value is the development of young players for the NHL, but when injuries hit and players get called up to the NHL, it's also important to have players in place that can fit in and maintain the AHL team's success. That is more important to an NHL team that owns its AHL affiliate (and thus wants profitability) than for a team that is merely affiliated with an AHL franchise.
And, occasionally, a guy like Mark Arcobello or Alex Burrows will work his way from the ECHL to the NHL.
I guess I just don't see how this benefits fans in ECHL cities. The whole model is set up to benefit everyone except the actual ECHL team (although I understand they don't get a big salary cap hit with AHL contracted players).
Essentially if you are a fan in an ECHL city the message is "don't build a roster to win because AHL teams will take your guys when they need them. The AHL club will also send you guys that are under contract but can't perform and don't want to be in the ECHL either". In Elmira many of the AHL contracted guys were much worse performers than the guys on ECHL deals, but coaches were pressured to play the AHL guys to "develop them" thus taking away ice time from guys who could help the team win.
Why a fan would want this over a more stable independent league team with more vets, less roster turnover, and the opportunity for the coaching staff to try to build a team to win is beyond me.
I never argued it was for the fans. But, consider how (un)successful the other models have been. The UHL and CHL (and, once upon a time, the IHL) have operated without NHL support, and all three have folded. Becoming a developmental league for the NHL means that the ECHL will be more stable financially. There may be more turnover of players from year to year, but how can that be worse than having teams / leagues fold?
I guess I just don't see how this benefits fans in ECHL cities. The whole model is set up to benefit everyone except the actual ECHL team (although I understand they don't get a big salary cap hit with AHL contracted players).
Essentially if you are a fan in an ECHL city the message is "don't build a roster to win because AHL teams will take your guys when they need them. The AHL club will also send you guys that are under contract but can't perform and don't want to be in the ECHL either". In Elmira many of the AHL contracted guys were much worse performers than the guys on ECHL deals, but coaches were pressured to play the AHL guys to "develop them" thus taking away ice time from guys who could help the team win.
Why a fan would want this over a more stable independent league team with more vets, less roster turnover, and the opportunity for the coaching staff to try to build a team to win is beyond me.
The 1:1:1 partnership could be further away than some think though, with the AHL possibly moving West, the ECHL could lose several Western teams.
Really. And yet the ECHL is recognized in the NHL CBA, meaning that a player signed to an NHL (Entry-Level) Contract can only be assigned to a team in the AHL or ECHL. Yet the NHL has "no interest" in the ECHL as a developmental league?
It is true that, as compared to baseball, NHL players are much less likely to have played AA - the development of players in baseball is very different than it is in hockey. But, 14 NHL teams own their AHL franchises ... and those franchises rely upon ECHL affiliates to develop players for the AHL, and also rely on their ECHL affiliates to provide players for recall throughout the season.
So, it's a bit ridiculous to suggest that the NHL has "no interest" in the ECHL. They have a great deal of interest.
I think the ECHL wants to be a true developmental league. It is yet to be seen if the NHL really wants that.
Agree.They don't. They just want a place to stash remaining bodies.
Does anyone think we will see in increase in the 50 contract limit for NHL teams? I think they would need to increase that number if the ECHL is going to be a true development league and not just a league with a sprinkling of NHL contracted players.
Most true statement I've read in a long time. I've seen more entertaining Junior A (LHJQ) games during one weekend in Quebec a month ago than the 35 games I went to in Elmira last season. Then you get leagues like the Q and that is amazing. You don't need prospects or big names, you just need teams built to win and play together and a sense of rivalries and dislike between the teams.
I really hope Peoria and Omaha become teams #29 and #30!
Would easily bet there won't remain 28 as is after this season(meaning some teams folding)
Until (and unless) the ECHL passes some kind of by-law requiring one (and only one) NHL/AHL affiliation, the idea of 30/30/30 remains only the sort of OCD obsession that insists that the NHL _must_ be expanding to 32 teams because the divisions are "uneven", even despite quotes from Bettman himself saying "we won't expand just for someone's idea of symmetry".
My advice for watchers is to stop obsessing about 30/30/30. Until and unless there are FAR more fundamental changes to the nature of the relationships of the league, the thing to watch far more closely is "which markets can this league retain, which markets can they add, and is there any more dancing we have to do if the AHL _does_ poach the leases in some of our current markets".
I would love to see the ECHL have a single affiliation policy someday. And I would say out of the current franchises in the league the ones with the most probability to fold after some time are Elmira, Brampton, and Wheeling (and Las Vegas). However I could see those franchise licenses being bought and transferred to cities such as Peoria, Houston (with a different arena) or Norfolk if the AHL leaves there. Those places I could hold an ECHL franchise and two have in the past.