- Sep 22, 2011
- 11,469
- 12,049
Did you read KPD's story recently about the Bruins' memories of their first skates? Chara's gave me nightmares
I refuse to pay for the Globe. But that sounds like an interesting article.
Did you read KPD's story recently about the Bruins' memories of their first skates? Chara's gave me nightmares
Something like that were my second ones... How the f*** did we survive?These were my first "non-beginner" skates, got the Junior model when I was around 7. Of course the ones in the picture belonged to a much better player.
View attachment 228043
Another inspirational quote from Williams, model captain really.
Something like that were my second ones... How the **** did we survive?
As a father of three boys who played hockey, I can confirm this to be absolutely true.You'd would think someone would see money to be made here. Hockey players always love getting more gear, lol.
Another inspirational quote from Williams, model captain really.
after 2011, we know special teams, or at least pp goals are not required lol
I'm with you. The key words: "position in the crease." He was outside the crease. WTF?!
Today is #ChocolateChipDay !!!!!!!!!!!!!
View attachment 228037 View attachment 228039 View attachment 228041
He's kind of a simple minded sort innit he?
How would you have felt if the jerseys were reversed? I think most of us would have been pissed if that goal was allowed. This wasn't a case of McIlheny getting bumped and failing to reset. He got hit as the shot was coming in. Yes, Debrusk got pushed somewhat, and yes, he tried to avoid contact. McIlheny was right on the edge of his crease - it's not like he was 10 feet out of the crease, or where Mrazek was on Clifton's goal...I guess I just don't see the uproar over this call.I've always maintained that if a goalie leaves the crease he's just another player out there subject to the same risks/rewards/rules for the forwards.
This call was pure bullspit.
Did you read KPD's story recently about the Bruins' memories of their first skates? Chara's gave me nightmares
I refuse to pay for the Globe. But that sounds like an interesting article.
That's exactly it though - the Bruins HAVE had that EXACT goal ALLOWED AGAINST them numerous times. That is my issue with it.How would you have felt if the jerseys were reversed? I think most of us would have been pissed if that goal was allowed. This wasn't a case of McIlheny getting bumped and failing to reset. He got hit as the shot was coming in. Yes, Debrusk got pushed somewhat, and yes, he tried to avoid contact. McIlheny was right on the edge of his crease - it's not like he was 10 feet out of the crease, or where Mrazek was on Clifton's goal...I guess I just don't see the uproar over this call.
Wasn’t much different than the one the Leafs scored that was allowed,the Leaf Player didn’t fall on Rask but definitely interfered with Rask being able to make the save.How would you have felt if the jerseys were reversed? I think most of us would have been pissed if that goal was allowed. This wasn't a case of McIlheny getting bumped and failing to reset. He got hit as the shot was coming in. Yes, Debrusk got pushed somewhat, and yes, he tried to avoid contact. McIlheny was right on the edge of his crease - it's not like he was 10 feet out of the crease, or where Mrazek was on Clifton's goal...I guess I just don't see the uproar over this call.
I'm not in an uproar, but if that rule is applied consistently, I have no issue. For off-side right now a leg above the line and not scraping on it is enough to reverse a goal call. Crease exists for a reason: player in the crease - interference, goalie outside the crease - good goal.How would you have felt if the jerseys were reversed? I think most of us would have been pissed if that goal was allowed. This wasn't a case of McIlheny getting bumped and failing to reset. He got hit as the shot was coming in. Yes, Debrusk got pushed somewhat, and yes, he tried to avoid contact. McIlheny was right on the edge of his crease - it's not like he was 10 feet out of the crease, or where Mrazek was on Clifton's goal...I guess I just don't see the uproar over this call.
It's not EXACTLY the same goal. But by your reaction, can I assume you thought the league screwed up in allowing those goals? If that's the case, why would you want them to continue to screw up by allowing the one last night?That's exactly it though - the Bruins HAVE had that EXACT goal ALLOWED AGAINST them numerous times. That is my issue with it.
He's either in his crease or he isn't and he wasn't.How would you have felt if the jerseys were reversed? I think most of us would have been pissed if that goal was allowed. This wasn't a case of McIlheny getting bumped and failing to reset. He got hit as the shot was coming in. Yes, Debrusk got pushed somewhat, and yes, he tried to avoid contact. McIlheny was right on the edge of his crease - it's not like he was 10 feet out of the crease, or where Mrazek was on Clifton's goal...I guess I just don't see the uproar over this call.
IIRC the Bruins had the worst PP % of any team that won the Cup. It was beyond awful. Thankfully their PK was the best in the league that year.
Zdeno Chara was 19 and playing for the Prince George Cougars of the WHL when that song reached the charts.Like...Ginuwine Pony? Were half of these guys even born when that song was popular?
I’m of the mind frame that if the opposing player makes contact with the goalie as a direct result of that goalies own teammate initiating contact, then yes, the goal should be allowed. In that sense, yes, exactly the same. IMO anyways. Not saying I’m right, it’s just how I see the contact aspect and is why I really thought it would be allowed.It's not EXACTLY the same goal. But by your reaction, can I assume you thought the league screwed up in allowing those goals? If that's the case, why would you want them to continue to screw up by allowing the one last night?
How would you have felt if the jerseys were reversed? I think most of us would have been pissed if that goal was allowed. This wasn't a case of McIlheny getting bumped and failing to reset. He got hit as the shot was coming in. Yes, Debrusk got pushed somewhat, and yes, he tried to avoid contact. McIlheny was right on the edge of his crease - it's not like he was 10 feet out of the crease, or where Mrazek was on Clifton's goal...I guess I just don't see the uproar over this call.
It's not EXACTLY the same goal. But by your reaction, can I assume you thought the league screwed up in allowing those goals? If that's the case, why would you want them to continue to screw up by allowing the one last night?
I just watched it again, and McIlheny's skates were still touching the blue paint when DeBrusk made contact with him. And you know it's never that cut and dried.I'm not in an uproar, but if that rule is applied consistently, I have no issue. For off-side right now a leg above the line and not scraping on it is enough to reverse a goal call. Crease exists for a reason: player in the crease - interference, goalie outside the crease - good goal.
Yes he was. Right at the edge.He's either in his crease or he isn't and he wasn't.