Glass is 31 years old. He's played in the NHL and a 22 year old hasn't, therefore he's "better?" And what can that even mean talking about a d-man who hasn't played in the NHL yet and a winger who has played a ton and consistently shown himself to be a complete liability? Just an insane comparison, and I'm starting to become as disappointed as anybody with Mac's development.
This is in no way worse than Jessiman. Every first rounder has potential when they're drafted, that's why they're first round picks. Jessiman was chosen over countless players who went on to become huge franchise players, and who's careers could have been easily predicted to be what they have been, at least as far as any prospect's career can be predicted. McI was chosen over arguably one obvious player who has become a franchise player so far, and that's Tarasenko.
For the millionth time, Dylan was thought to have the potential to be a solid player by many, many teams and scouts. It wasn't the Rangers choosing a guy who was supposed to go in the fifth because he was tough. Sometimes players don't work out, even 10 overall picks. You'd think this is completely unprecedented the way some people react.