ole ole
Registered User
- Oct 7, 2017
- 11,937
- 6,021
I think you got a little mixed up.The only top D-man in that offer is going to you guys.So Hawks give up a top 9 forward and a top pair defenseman for a bunch of dog****...solid proposal...
I think you got a little mixed up.The only top D-man in that offer is going to you guys.So Hawks give up a top 9 forward and a top pair defenseman for a bunch of dog****...solid proposal...
I think you got a little mixed up.The only top D-man in that offer is going to you guys.
Got it so Orpik got a notch on Erik Karlsson too, it make sense now. Thanks Taylor!
Trash talking only works if it has an element of truth to it. I would say try again but we both know you aren't clever enough to chrip in any way that would be deserving of my attention.
Hope you have a large bank account because you'd easily lose that bet.Your talking about 2 different types of players. That analogy is lame. Drouin let's just say everyone says this kids has lots of upside potential , however his actions in Tampa and his lackluster performance as of late doesn't make him better than Saad. Saad is having a slump however he has a ring and his style of play makes him a more versatile forward. Drouin doesn't play a solid 2 way game. Let's just say a team that wants to make a serious run for the cup and the GM has a choice between Saad or Drouin id bet a million bucks Saad would be the player that team wants and takes.
I see you don't watch the game much.Jokigod already a better defenseman at 19 than Jeff ****ing Petry will ever be...
Alzner or Shaw with retention for Saad with no retention. Each team can add some parts to it but this is the only workable deal we got for Saad. Drouin for Saad? Come on man.
Hawks get absolutely hosed in both deals.
Your talking about 2 different types of players. That analogy is lame. Drouin let's just say everyone says this kids has lots of upside potential , however his actions in Tampa and his lackluster performance as of late doesn't make him better than Saad. Saad is having a slump however he has a ring and his style of play makes him a more versatile forward. Drouin doesn't play a solid 2 way game. Let's just say a team that wants to make a serious run for the cup and the GM has a choice between Saad or Drouin id bet a million bucks Saad would be the player that team wants and takes.
And the Habs don't get hosed in the Drouin for Saad swap?
Shaw ($1M retained) and Scherbak for Saad and a 2nd or 3rd. This deal works for both teams if the Blackhawks want to move on from Saad and create cap space
- Habs are after picks: Check
- Blackhawks are after cap space: Check (They save about $2.5M in cap space)
- Blackhawks get a familiar player back that is respected on their team (with salary retention). Plus they get a talented but struggling forward in Scherbak.
- Habs get Saad where we need the muscle and size to mix well with our smurf forwards.
If you think you can get more for Saad, all the power too you. The Habs are not drolling over this return just as much as you think Shaw/Scherbak are worth. This is about addressing team needs and it's workable.
LOL Hudon't say.. If anything is dog**** it's the OP's proposal. I love how you believe some rookie is a top pairing defenseman after a few games and (Sportsnet Top 15 defenseman in league) Petry is not. Also, Hudon is a top 9 forward himself, only way way less $$$. Keep your trash.So Hawks give up a top 9 forward and a top pair defenseman for a bunch of dog****...solid proposal...
Not as bad as losing Drouin to a declining non-factor.Hawks get absolutely hosed in both deals.
These conditions are backwards. Chicago wouldn't be rewarded for making the playoffs or having lucic score more.
Hahahaha . Petry and top pairing does not belong in the same sentence . Only way Petry is a top pairing D if you have a stud of a 1D with him . I like Petry MacT butcher the deal with him and it came back to bit us in the ass but he is not number 1 or number 2 D on a good teamthe only top pair defenseman I see is Petry
I don't believe the Hawks are desperate for cap space anymore.
LOL Hudon't say.. If anything is dog**** it's the OP's proposal. I love how you believe some rookie is a top pairing defenseman after a few games and (Sportsnet Top 15 defenseman in league) Petry is not. Also, Hudon is a top 9 forward himself, only way way less $$$. Keep your trash.
Well he is currently playing top pairing and he is not doing bad. The habs are better than anticipated without that so called stud 1D. I don't get the hate on him or dare I say he is under appreciated.Hahahaha . Petry and top pairing does not belong in the same sentence . Only way Petry is a top pairing D if you have a stud of a 1D with him . I like Petry MacT butcher the deal with him and it came back to bit us in the ass but he is not number 1 or number 2 D on a good team
Hahahaha . Petry and top pairing does not belong in the same sentence . Only way Petry is a top pairing D if you have a stud of a 1D with him . I like Petry MacT butcher the deal with him and it came back to bit us in the ass but he is not number 1 or number 2 D on a good team
I'll take Byron over Saad quite easily. Saad is abysmal.Imagine thinking Jeff Petry will have a better career than Henri Jokiharju and Brandon Saad is worse than Paul Byron...
Saad is good, But Byron is crazy fast and can really put the puck in the net, and he’s on a sweetheart contract.I'll take Byron over Saad quite easily. Saad is abysmal.
We don't have to imagine. We.... well most of us can see it.Imagine thinking Jeff Petry will have a better career than Henri Jokiharju and Brandon Saad is worse than Paul Byron...