Bluelines
Python FTW!
- Nov 17, 2013
- 12,349
- 4,559
I love Marner but for 4 first rounders, I'd take that in a heart beat. Four high end players that would probably be in the NHL within 2 years of their draft. It would go a long way in giving relief for our cap problems.
Lets say Marner walks this year, we get four first rounders and then we have the option to play in the UFA market. Dregger reported yesterday that the 2015 Panarin sweepstakes came down to Chicago, Toronto and Montreal. Lets assume that is true for a second, this team is MUCH more attractive today than it was 3 years ago. One would have to think Panarin would give us an honest look again.
Say we sign Panarin for the money Mitch is asking for, I've seen reports that Panarin will ask for, Tavares like money and term... Panarin is a LW, we are horribly under skilled at the LW position. So we improve our LW, we get 4 high end first rounders, we get no drop in production, we get cap relief... ummm ...
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
Do we lose a lot in terms of production if we lose Marner and get Panarin + 4 first rounders? Nope, it would actually be a wash, probably a gain because of the four first rounders.
Again I love Mitch's game but the possibility of gaining 4 first rounders for almost nothing is really intriguing to me.
Lets say Marner walks this year, we get four first rounders and then we have the option to play in the UFA market. Dregger reported yesterday that the 2015 Panarin sweepstakes came down to Chicago, Toronto and Montreal. Lets assume that is true for a second, this team is MUCH more attractive today than it was 3 years ago. One would have to think Panarin would give us an honest look again.
Say we sign Panarin for the money Mitch is asking for, I've seen reports that Panarin will ask for, Tavares like money and term... Panarin is a LW, we are horribly under skilled at the LW position. So we improve our LW, we get 4 high end first rounders, we get no drop in production, we get cap relief... ummm ...
Per Game | ||||
Player | G | A | PTS | S |
Mitch Marner | 0.29 | 0.63 | 0.92 | 2.44 |
Artemi Panarin | 0.37 | 0.63 | 1 | 2.59 |
Do we lose a lot in terms of production if we lose Marner and get Panarin + 4 first rounders? Nope, it would actually be a wash, probably a gain because of the four first rounders.
Again I love Mitch's game but the possibility of gaining 4 first rounders for almost nothing is really intriguing to me.