I am just saying their trajectory as a result of that is day & night different to ours. I've completely given up on the conversation about how this team should be ran.
I would agree on Current Year Hawks/Canucks, yeah. I was focusing on your line about the Cup winning team the Hawks had assembled.
The path the Hawks have gone under is the one the Canucks should've gone under earlier, I agree.
I have this poster on ignore. He is a self admitted troll.
How much was intentional can be debated (that is not my point at all) fact is they had massive amounts of picks in the first two rounds during that time.
I think going to hockeydb and just eyeballing a list of picks is a bit of a misnomer. Some of these picks were acquired due to what I had said before, about Wirtz being a cheapskate and an asshole.
EG, the Hawks got 2 1st rounders for Chelios. Not because they were trying to tank, but because they didn't want to re-sign Chelios. You can say it's good asset management, but trying to contort it to some sort of byzantine scheme is a stretch.
2022-23 they were very disciplined about being bad.
I agree.
I do not honestly give a f*** what happened 20 years ago to put them on this type of cycle.
Then don't bring it up, lmao.
My dismissive tone is just a response to their dismissive tone. Also I honestly think there are some really naïve opinions you need to hold or you need to be willingly dishonest to say the things some of these folk say.
I'm not sure about that.
All MS was really saying is that there was a time to do what the Hawks were doing, but it was several years ago in the midst of the clusterf*** Benning years.
His 'video game' comment is just a shorthand to talk about how you need to consider player feelings/thoughts in the mix and not just look at everything as purely transactional. An egregious example of what I'm talking about would be the recent furor with the Flames and Sutter.
Telling the team that we're going to just stink it up, reduce your playing minutes for AHLers, etc. isn't going to sit well with most professional athletes. You might think it's achievable, but at the very least the reaction to such a strategy from your roster needs to be considered.
Obviously the answer is not that simple.
EP & QH certainly are good enough pieces to be part of a cup contending core. But two players is not enough.
Well, that's why I said 'build around.' You have to start somewhere. If they're not a good starting point, that's totally fair.
There are very few goaltenders in the world who can start +60 games and be quality starters in the playoffs. Demko has shown to break down under that type of usage. If we are to count on him as the 3rd elite piece he has to show he can be one of the ~5 people on this planet that can play +60 regular season games and still be able to hide our warts in the playoffs.
We can hope that he is that. Its not even completely unreasonable. But hope is not a plan.
We play in a league with 31 other teams in the league who also will try to compete and most of them are in a better spot to do so or in the process of exiting their contention windows.
We have:
- No cap space
- VERY FEW players on contracts they are out performing
- No draft pick surplus
- No prospect pool
- No depth at Center, Defense and Goalie.
- Depth but no quality at wings
Basically the situation is that of a team exiting its contention window, without ever actually making the playoffs legitimately.
Yeah, I agree mostly on this. It's very much treading water and the path to respectability for the Canucks is a long one. What it comes down to is whether or not some of the good pieces we do have are worth building around or not. If it's the latter, then it should be close to full on scorched earth.
I think either way isn't particularly encouraging. The first runs the risk of continuing to get saddled with cumbersome contracts and more or less putting the team back to where we started. The latter runs the risk of much the same, but with pissing off players and/or making Vancouver an undesirable destination for players a la Atlanta back in the day.
We will be mediocre and will be picking in the 12-18 range enough to perpetually stay here. In 8 years there will be another 2-3 really good young players who prevent us from actually taking a step back even a little because the loosing culture will seep in.
There will be some other "unforeseen" obstacle next year that will be used as an excuse for why we weren't good enough. This year it was goaltending. (See VGK as an example how this should not be used as an excuse if we are supposed to be a playoff caliber team.)
The issues this year is that we had a shite D corps, a coach that was hung out to dry (and team who had more or less tuned him out as a result) and ya, some shitty goaltending. Like you said earlier, expecting Demko to be perfect is not a sane or logical course of action, but the team was more or less built with that in mind, so, yeah, it is a contributing factor.
BUT.... I think the timing to actually take a breath and wait out a few bad contracts and try to accumulate picks and prospects and maybe sell some pieces at the TDL is gone. We are now stuck on this path. The retool folk will get their wish. I will not. To me this means we wont be contending with EP & QH.
This is why I'm saying that you and MS are on the same page. I don't think MS is in love with the idea of what the team is doing, but there's not really other options because the time has passed.
Next summer, I think will be very telling of what this will look like. I will admit with joy that I had it all wrong if they actually pull a massive overhaul of the team this summer. I fear the other side will do no such thing if the opposite happens.
Edit. Im really making an effort to stay out of this discussion / debate. There absolutely zero to be gained. The premise of 'the other side' is so far removed from mine that no actual discussion even takes place. It just becomes a circular argument where we can agree on even the most basic things about what it takes to create a cup contention window from the position we find our selves.
And ya, I'm with you. I was always waiting for Benning to prove me wrong because I'd much rather the team be a winner and be enjoyable than be 'right' (The y2k paradox) but it never came.
I think we're mostly in agreement in a lot of things and there's generally a lot of common ground with the folks who are butting heads. Sorry for dragging you into this when you weren't wanting to, haha, I was just clarifying one comment.