bruinmann77
Registered User
still waiting for that #2 LHD that was such a priority
No he isn't.
Forbort has 350 NHL games under his belt.
Hakanpaa was an overaged rookie.
Come contract time that matters. Even if stylistically there are similarities. Both are great shot blockers. After Adam Larsson, Hakanpaa had the highest total of hits + blocks in the entire NHL last year among D-men.
And for what it's worth, I like Hakanpaa and would of liked him in Boston on that deal. But even if they were interested, I would daresay he didn't see the type of opportunity for him in Boston with McAvoy and Carlo on the right side (and Clifton) that he sees in Dallas with Klingberg and then a pile of left-shot D-men. I'm not sure Hakanpaa is an everyday player here, and he will be in Dallas (he's probably their 5th best D-man).
Yes, they should never sign a standout Sophmore or rookie if they can pay more for a bit more experience. I just dont see that logic. Hakanpaa was one of the best shot blockers, playing LESS minutes than Forbort on a better team. If you asked anyone other than rose colored glass bruins fans they take Hakanpaa 100% over Forbort at that salary.
Except that I think he literally said he liked the player and the contract and explained why the player may have chose a team other then the B's even if we matched the offer. So while it's a strong point that sometimes you you sign sophomores if they provide value, noone was arguing that.
Wrong, he said they were not comparable players and they are. I didnt say WHY we couldnt sign him instead. I said we overpaid for what we got. Its that simple.
Forbort is a slow soft muffinWhich one are you referring to as soft?
They are comparable full stop. Hakanpaa was better actually better, full stop. Now changing the goal posts as he wouldnt sign here anyways because of defensive sides was never the original post I made. I originally said they are comparable players and we overpaid, and I got a NO response.Read through it again.
"And for what it's worth, I like Hakanpaa and would of liked him in Boston on that deal. But even if they were interested, I would daresay he didn't see the type of opportunity for him in Boston with McAvoy and Carlo on the right side (and Clifton) that he sees in Dallas with Klingberg and then a pile of left-shot D-men. I'm not sure Hakanpaa is an everyday player here, and he will be in Dallas (he's probably their 5th best D-man)."
That's why I didn't respond to your original post but the one that sidtorted another poster's arguments altogether. BTW not saying I agree with your original premise, just saying it is hard to follow your discussion with BD when you have completely manipulated what he is saying to fit an agenda. I'll keep reading and hopefully it was just an oversight and not willful ignorance.They are comparable full stop. Hakanpaa was better actually better, full stop. Now changing the goal posts as he wouldnt sign here anyways because of defensive sides was never the original post I made. I originally said they are comparable players and we overpaid, and I got a NO response.
The only reason I got was, he has 100 or so games more experience, which I replied its a flimsy argument.
Marian Hossa - Pitt-Detroit-ChicagoBeen beat in the SCF two years in a row with different teams. If TB goes to the SCF, will this be the first time a player has played in a SCF three years in row with 3 different teams? BTW, not a bad pick up by TB for a 4th line player who brings it in the playoffs. Will be interesting to see how much money they are giving him.
I am with you, I think we are way better off in goal than last year at this time.I can't be the only one who likes Ullmark/Swayman (with the possibility of adding Rask) better than Tuukka/Halak. Can I?
That's why I didn't respond to your original post but the one that sidtorted another poster's arguments altogether. BTW not saying I agree with your original premise, just saying it is hard to follow your discussion with BD when you have completely manipulated what he is saying to fit an agenda. I'll keep reading and hopefully it was just an oversight and not willful ignorance.
Once again I think you are taking what he said out of context. If that is incorrect, that I have misunderstood the conversation. I will simply stop following your discussions, until my opinion of your technique changes. It's too bad, I like listening to the detractors as much as the prognosticators. I think BD plays both sides of that pretty well decision to decision based on a wider base of knowledge. I'm fine not knowing everything, but I won't learn anything from conversations like these.If you dont understand the discussion then why comment? This has nothing to do about left or right side needs, which was his other comment and thats in regards to him wanting to play here or not, but that was never the original point I was making. . This is purely comparing the two players and contract. We overpaid for similar type of player. That is all.
yeah please put me on ignore, you are annoyingly wrong and wont admit itOnce again I think you are taking what he said out of context. If that is incorrect, that I have misunderstood the conversation. I will simply stop following your discussions, until my opinion of your technique changes. It's too bad, I like listening to the detractors as much as the prognosticators. I think BD plays both sides of that pretty well decision to decision based on a wider base of knowledge. I'm fine not knowing everything, but I won't learn anything from conversations like these.
You are now the only member of the board I block. @BruinDust if I misunderstood your comments and made a mess there I apologize.yeah please put me on ignore, you are annoyingly wrong and wont admit it
How would they even be able to sighn Rask with the Cap ,maybe cheap 1 year to finish the season?I'm right there with you and I love Rask, but think Ullmark is that good. IMO if Rask even comes back there is a good chance he will be the backup to Ullmark too.
I can't be the only one who likes Ullmark/Swayman (with the possibility of adding Rask) better than Tuukka/Halak. Can I?
How would they even be able to sighn Rask with the Cap ,maybe cheap 1 year to finish the season?
How would they even be able to sighn Rask with the Cap ,maybe cheap 1 year to finish the season?
Didn’t it all go to Coyle, and our 4LD that make over 12 million combined per year?Next year when he pays Mac, that 6 million he is saving from those 3 will come in handy.
here is hoping tuuka rask does not sign with the Dallas Stars. big Finish contingent on that team, he may want to
join them. Jim Nill has nothing to loose by putting an offer on the table for him. If Tuuka decides to leave boston
i could see him going to DALLAS.
They are comparable full stop. Hakanpaa was better actually better, full stop. Now changing the goal posts as he wouldnt sign here anyways because of defensive sides was never the original post I made. I originally said they are comparable players and we overpaid, and I got a NO response.
The only reason I got was, he has 100 or so games more experience, which I replied its a flimsy argument.
Jesus Hakanpaa is an every D in the Bruins D corp even if is a RHD, Clifton play both side so...dammit beat me to it lol.
I thought the Krejci section sounded way more optimistic than some are making it out to be.
David may not want to play a full 82. I could see him wanting to play 40 and playoffs.
I can’t find it anywhere. I googled it. Went to the Twitter hardo’s, asked the Fed Ex guy who delivered the next street over package incorrectly to my house.Are they making the playoffs if he plays 40?