So you wanted MB to sign him long term?
Its a deal that gives both sides some insurance. If he proves to be the player he can be as you say, we had him on the cheap for 2 years then pay him accordingly. Don't see a problem with that myself.
If he doesn't, you had him at a manageable cost for 2 years.
The time to move AG to maximize return was 1-2 yrs ago.
Ill let it play out before judging. AG wasn't the super C prospect so many on here claim.
I wouldn't have made the trade in the first place, but given that we did yes it would've made a lot more sense to sign him long term cap friendly deal.
First it would make the move consistent, by not doing it Bergevin is essentially saying to Domi we traded for you but we don't really believe in you. So if you're hoping a change in scenery fixes his issues then that's a terrible message to send.
Second, it's extremely unlikely we become competitive over the next 2 seasons. Best case is that 3 years from now we've addressed the C & D and have become a legitimate contender. So having Domi on the cheap for 2 years is meaningless, what matters is how much he would cost when we are a contending team.
Third, if he doesn't work out and we've overpaid in money & term it's not going to matter because we won't be contenders. There's zero chance of us being contenders in the short-medium term if guys like Domi and Drouin stay at their current levels.
When you've only got one chance you go all in you don't hedge your bet.