Gary Nylund
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2013
- 30,243
- 22,918
It wouldn't matter to me as long as it's not a watered-down playoff format. A champion should have to go through four 7-game series before being crowned.
The rest isn't all that important in my eyes.
Plus, you become a lot more invested as a fan when the games are unfolding in front of your eyes with the ups and downs of a playoff run.
Thats my point! All the build up and waiting and we cant even celebrate properly.It would be hilarious if they win and they can't even have a parade. Most Leafy thing ever.
And the 1994-1995 season with New Jersey's cup win.
Winning this year would be "legit" but not as satisfying as it normally would be for sure.
Whatever happens this year, it's gonna be dumb and considered an asterix season. I think some are just desperate for hockey and don't care about the quality of the product. If the NHL wasn't so desperate for the revenue, I'm sure there would be more concern about the integrity of the game.
All the talk of 24 team playoffs, minimal contact and full faceshields is plain silly.
That’s some of the arguments for an asterisk ad it is actually easier and levels the field. IMO, the Leafs or Panthers were not going on the road and beating both TB and Boston under a normal playoff, however under these scenarios, either team could win the Cup if they make it in.Why would it be considered an asterisk season?
With the playoffs being played at a neutral site, teams fully healthy, no sort of advantage for any team (like home ice), etc. that's as legit as a championship win gets.
That’s some of the arguments for an asterisk ad it is actually easier and levels the field. IMO, the Leafs or Panthers were not going on the road and beating both TB and Boston under a normal playoff, however under these scenarios, either team could win the Cup if they make it in.
Yes anything can happen and Columbus didnt get past TB and Boston last year and I feel the same about Florida or Toronto this year. Beating Boston with potentially four games in Boston is much different than playing at a neutral site without fans. Again the fact no team has an advantage or disadvantage is precisely why I feel there would be an asterisk.Eh, anything can happen in the playoffs even during "normal" circumstances.
Id wager zero people predicted the Bolts would be swept by Columbus last year.
Personally im not convinced this new system advantages any particular team over another.
So, if the NHL BoG voted to change to a new playoff format where only 8 teams made the playoffs and they played two rounds with 5 game series and the final as a 7 game series, you would consider all winners from that point on to not be true champions?
In 15 and 16 they never made the WS which is much different.
No, but if one year, say on March 14 , they decided that some teams would be taken to Honolulu to play in a neutral site playoff, I’d say great, but I will not consider the winner a true champion.So, if the NHL BoG voted to change to a new playoff format where only 8 teams made the playoffs and they played two rounds with 5 game series and the final as a 7 game series, you would consider all winners from that point on to not be true champions?
I suppose that or the soccer team. I guess it’s an age difference but everyone I know in Toronto and down here don't follow either of those sports in the slightest.Raptors