Wizeman*
Guest
Half the organisation had Norwalk over the road trip. I'm hoping that's why they are playing so poorly still.
Ok , WTF is 'Norwalk' ???
I thought they had gout.
Half the organisation had Norwalk over the road trip. I'm hoping that's why they are playing so poorly still.
The team is very heavily leaning on the Sedin line - the on / off ice gap is huge. Given that the d pairings aren't tied at the hip to a particular line, there's only 1 conclusion: our bottom 9 is poor (among them, only Higgins and Hansen have more than 1 goal at ES). The other teams know this full well and will do whatever to stop them (assisted by Auger's buddies) without having to worry about the other lines at all. Pretty dismal situation. either GMMG starts making changes asap or he'll be forced to later.
the core is Henrik, Daniel, Burr, Kesler, Hansen, Hamhuis, Bieksa, Edler,Tanev and Luongo or Schneider. 10 players, ~43.6MM cap hit...
Those who think a new coach will magically turn our bottom 9 into scoring threats are kidding themselves. The only thing he could do is shorten the bench and lean on the Sedins even more...
As Tiranis mentioned, the second and third lines are being told to play in an offensive style that does not suit them (cycling down low).
Half the organisation had Norwalk over the road trip. I'm hoping that's why they are playing so poorly still.
Kesler Raymond and Schroeder are north south players . They like to score off the rush. Asking them to cycle to get the puck back to the D is not their style.
Kesler Raymond and Schroeder are north south players . They like to score off the rush. Asking them to cycle to get the puck back to the D is not their style.
Teams just let them have the outside and take away the point shot. They need to create space and make plays to break down the defense.
And yet our coaches think that's how the whole team should play. It's sad to watch.
As Tiranis mentioned, the second and third lines are being told to play in an offensive style that does not suit them (cycling down low).
Every team in the NHL tries to get the puck back to the open D in the offensive zone. Off the rush, the D are supposed to have jumped into the play so it's not necessarily "cycling" it back to the D. Many teams have picked up on this and track the jumping dman. Also, I think the Canucks D aren't playing with much confidence and are jumping in less.
Ok , WTF is 'Norwalk' ???
I thought they had gout.
I can't elaborate right now but I spent some time on this in the AV thread. Canucks (generally) only allow the forwards to cycle down low rather than using the full zone which is something that guys like Raymond and Schroeder would be good at with their speed. The breakouts we use are also not conducive to creating offense off the rush.
It's not really surprising because this team wants to play a puck possession system almost to a fault. Keeping the puck in the offensive zone is the primary directive. Creating offense off the rush generally goes against that since you're pretty likely to give up the puck. Teams like Chicago and Detroit have a better balance while being good puck possession teams. Ottawa is a great up-and-comer in this area and have IMO really innovated with their usage of the D.
Gillis hasn't done much to improve secondary scoring in the bottom 9. We play against teams with a better second/third/fourth line all the time. Generally, if the Sedin's get shut down, we lose. Gillis has banked on Raymond getting back into second line form - which looks like a decent bet this season - but he's still a streaky player and can be quieted pretty easily. Booth has obviously been hindered by injuries and has been streaky too and he hasn't really had an extended period of games where he's looked particularly dangerous. It's said constantly that we have too many players who play the same way or have the same amount of scoring ability - or should I say - lack thereof. Finding two wingers who truly compliment Kesler is something that Gillis still needs to do. The bottom 6 could use a change as well.
I can't elaborate right now but I spent some time on this in the AV thread. Canucks (generally) only allow the forwards to cycle down low rather than using the full zone which is something that guys like Raymond and Schroeder would be good at with their speed. The breakouts we use are also not conducive to creating offense off the rush.
It's not really surprising because this team wants to play a puck possession system almost to a fault. Keeping the puck in the offensive zone is the primary directive. Creating offense off the rush generally goes against that since you're pretty likely to give up the puck. Teams like Chicago and Detroit have a better balance while being good puck possession teams. Ottawa is a great up-and-comer in this area and have IMO really innovated with their usage of the D.
I'll have to disagree with that statement. There are really only a handful of other teams in the west with better forward depth. Against other teams though it's a decidedly big advantage for us.
I'm talking about forward scoring depth. I don't know if I made that clear or not, apologies if I didn't. You might still choose to disagree anyway, and that's fair.
Rick's last home Pats game was against Brandon, at the end of the 12-win season. I recall him standing in front of the bench, screaming at his lifeless teammates to show some emotion. He went out and scored a hattrick that night, including the winner, and prevented the Wheat Kings from clinching the pennant.
Half the organisation had Norwalk over the road trip. I'm hoping that's why they are playing so poorly still.
If yes, please explain why and how big
If no, please explain why not