I think most of us were surprised at just how successful the Bruins were last season but it goes back further than that really - ever since Claude left (still one of our greatest coaches ever) the Bruins turned a 180. The Bruins went from mostly defensive structure to a three zone transition effort and the Bergeron line, Krug, the kids all excelled from it.
I think it will continue barring injury. As for the Krejci/second line dilemma, we shall see. The first line alone makes it a playoff team with Chara/Krug/McAvoy and Rask.
IMO the biggest threat to the Bruins is whether or not the top line can score 38% of the teams goals like they did last season. No other team relied so heavily on one line. I don't buy into the regression theories around age, but I do question if that line can drag the rest of the team to a 100+ point finish again.I think most of us were surprised at just how successful the Bruins were last season but it goes back further than that really - ever since Claude left (still one of our greatest coaches ever) the Bruins turned a 180. The Bruins went from mostly defensive structure to a three zone transition effort and the Bergeron line, Krug, the kids all excelled from it.
I think it will continue barring injury. As for the Krejci/second line dilemma, we shall see. The first line alone makes it a playoff team with Chara/Krug/McAvoy and Rask.
I think Boston's deeper than some give them credit for. Their talented youth are starting to fill out the lineup.
Luongo was just as good as Price is now during his initial run with the Panthers. He couldn't drag that team to the playoffs because there wasn't enough scoring on the roster. The Habs have that same problem especially now that Weber is out for most if not all of the season.Of the 4 teams everyone is dismissing, I think Montreal does have a shot. Only because goaltending can cover up a lot of problems and it's always possible Price bounces back and performs like the best in the world again.
Luongo was just as good as Price is now during his initial run with the Panthers. He couldn't drag that team to the playoffs because there wasn't enough scoring on the roster. The Habs have that same problem especially now that Weber is out for most if not all of the season.
Also - regarding Boston and Winnipeg. Going into last season, by HF Boston was ranked 18th Stanley cup favorite, and Winnipeg 19th. Edmonton was #2. This was from a series of polls that was conducted right before the season started. Here's the link:
https://hfboards.mandatory.com/threads/2018-stanley-cup-favourite-22.2383803/
So yeah - things change a lot from year to year, and it's hardly only a couple of fringe posters who didn't see Bos/Winnipeg coming. It was a majority opinion around here.
Teams you think suck (Buffalo, Mtl, Ottawa & Detroit) often skyrocket, and teams you think should dominate (Boston, Tor, Tampa) can often falter. Just as happened last year
I think it's likely the top 3 remain the same but would be a mistake to sleep on Buffalo. This year probably won't be their year, but I expect Buffalo will make some strides this coming season.
Ottawa was a fluke, we all knew it.It's unlikely, things change too much year to year. The season before last Tampa missed the playoffs and Ottawa was a top 3 team.
I really don't get the O'Reilly trade. That dude is a hell of a gamer.Ill go further and say that not only will the top 3 stay at the top, but 3 of Montreal, Buffalo, Ottawa and Detroit will remain in the bottom 5 of the standings
I also think Florida could steal a wildcard spot
Polak, although he had a good stretch while being carried by Dermott is one of the worst defenseman in the entire NHL. Carrick is arguably our best RD (yes, over Zaitsev/Hainsey).
If Carrick is the best RHD on the team, maybe Babcock should be fired. Carrick was used so little late in the season and the playoffs.
in 03/04 Luongo put up a 2.31 SV % and a 2.43 GAA. The Panthers finished with 75 points. I don't think the Habs are that level bad, but they are easily one of the bottom 7ish rosters in the NHL and that's with Pacioretty. It's going to take Price having a Vezina season plus a couple players blossoming into 60+ point players for the Habs to be in the playoff race.No question about the Habs scoring problem, but the Luongo anecdote doesn't sway me. If Price puts up a .933 SV% like he did in 14-15, I'm confident the Habs will make the playoffs. Of course that's a huge ask of him and I don't expect it. But I can at least see a path, albeit unlikely, for the Habs having success. I really can't with the other three teams people are dismissing.
Ottawa, Buffalo, Montreal and Detroit are much worse. Only Florida is a threat.
If Carrick is the best RHD on the team, maybe Babcock should be fired. Carrick was used so little late in the season and the playoffs.
I really don't get the O'Reilly trade. That dude is a hell of a gamer.
Babcock just doesn't like him. Similar situation to Leivo, except Carrick has actually proved himself to be at minimum an ok top-4 guy or a great 6.
He suppresses shots/chances and generates shots/chances much better than both Hainsey and Zaitsev.