- May 25, 2014
- 45,959
- 31,399
It is a good crew hereAt HFCanucks, only the best is good enough
It is a good crew hereAt HFCanucks, only the best is good enough
We have to be, or Zombo or PG or Mr C will kick our a . . . I mean, yeah, it's a good crewIt is a good crew here
Dont worry as soon as my warning points expire i will be applying to be a mod to help clean this place up and make it EVEN betterWe have to be, or Zombo or PG or Mr C will kick our a . . . I mean, yeah, it's a good crew
nervously looks over his shoulder while covering his derriere with both hands
Dont worry as soon as my warning points expire i will be applying to be a mod to help clean this place up and make it EVEN better
This is scary but it may turn out to be a blessing in disguise. Demko now has an opportunity to prove that he's capable of backstopping this team to the playoffs.
remember 2015 season. ryan miller was hurt and lack played down the stretch and propelled the canucks to the playoffs, face calgary and the ending wasn't good. now its demkos time to shine.
Canucks go all-in to make the playoffs, splash out supreme $ on FAs, trade a 1st, 2nd, 3rd and (slightly) possibly a 4th round picks in the last seven months, pack the salary to the rafters guaranteeing this lineup can't be back...then Markstrom goes down for 3 weeks minimum right at the trading deadline.
This is the most Canucks thing ever.
wasn't there supposed to be an updated on Markstrom's timeline today?
nothing so far?
Markstrom
GS: 43 W: 23 W% 53.5
Demko
GS: 19 W: 11 W% 57.9
We have a better winning percentage with Demko in net. The hockey world that thought the Canucks might slide underestimated Demko; he’s solid.
Demko has beaten St. Louis twice and those are his only wins against playoff teams. He's been given a soft schedule and has done well against mostly bottom-feeders, which isn't what he's going to be looking at going forward.
Demko has beaten St. Louis twice and those are his only wins against playoff teams. He's been given a soft schedule and has done well against mostly bottom-feeders, which isn't what he's going to be looking at going forward.
He also has wins against Calgary and Nashville.
Ha, so he has. Neither was in a playoff position last time I quoted this stat a week or two ago. Man, is Arizona taking a dump down the standings right now.
Yep. There really is a difference between being a back up goalie and being a #1 goalie. That's why it's laughable when posters want to suggest that Lack outplayed both Miller and Luongo and is therefore the better goalie.
Miller posted his career best SV% in his first season in Anaheim as a backup. His GAA and SV% were better than Gibson's.
well the stats showed he outplayed him the outrage was as benning said “he got a better offer for miller” but decided to keep him to push for the playoffs
Seems like positive news