Come on now.
Ask yourself, take out the names and faces; Is a top 10 pick worth a goalie...I'm sorry but there is not a more generic position in the NHL today. Sure there are a couple that are above the pack, but the pack is not all different from each other.
A proven player is always worth more than a pick in my opinion, any pick. But you gottta tough sell trying to tell me Cory was proven, even today he is not proven. And he plays a position that has tons of adequate options available.
All that makes questioning the pick vs. player in this instance a legitimate one to me.
You actually didn't think that the Rolston contract was horrible the moment it was announced? To a lot of fans credit , that deal was panned the moment it was announced on the ESPN boards. Here's one for you to answer, name the good moves he's made over the last few years. You have to exclude Kovy because based on everyone on here that was VBK who wanted him. I'll give you Jags but after that you will be hard pressed to find a good move. Maybe Zids for the 12 run. The bad clearly out weighs the good. Remember when he traded a 1st to get rid of malakov?
I don't have a problem with Matteau as a player. I have more of a problem with the bizarre reasoning behind the move. The entire NHL community was befuddled why they didn't the penalty at #29 and simply get it over it. They were fortunate enough that Blitzer and Harris wield enough juice that a pick was eventually returned.
Come on now.
Ask yourself, take out the names and faces; Is a top 10 pick worth a goalie...I'm sorry but there is not a more generic position in the NHL today. Sure there are a couple that are above the pack, but the pack is not at all different from each other.
A proven player is always worth more than a pick in my opinion, any pick. But you gottta tough sell trying to tell me Cory was proven, even today he is not proven. And he plays a position that has tons of adequate options available.
All that makes questioning the pick vs. player in this instance a legitimate one to me.
Believe what you want but Lou said at the Fan Club meeting last month that if they gave up a pick it was them admitting they did something wrong, which they didn't, and despite what the league and everyone else is saying, he knew they'd be getting something back years ago.
This thread is about Volch and his buy out.
Plain and simple. Any talk about anything else is going to be deleted, warned, infracted, etc...
Come on now.
Ask yourself, take out the names and faces; Is a top 10 pick worth a goalie...I'm sorry but there is not a more generic position in the NHL today. Sure there are a couple that are above the pack, but the pack is not at all different from each other.
A proven player is always worth more than a pick in my opinion, any pick. But you gottta tough sell trying to tell me Cory was proven, even today he is not proven. And he plays a position that has tons of adequate options available.
All that makes questioning the pick vs. player in this instance a legitimate one to me.
Congrats. You are the only person I know that has ever defended the Rolston contract. The man was 35 years old and was finished and he gave him a 5 year deal at 5mil per. Enough said. Time to move on. It's in the past. You would be wise to not bring it up and try and defend it.
You actually didn't think that the Rolston contract was horrible the moment it was announced? To a lot of fans credit , that deal was panned the moment it was announced on the ESPN boards. Here's one for you to answer, name the good moves he's made over the last few years. You have to exclude Kovy because based on everyone on here that was VBK who wanted him. I'll give you Jags but after that you will be hard pressed to find a good move. Maybe Zids for the 12 run. The bad clearly out weighs the good. Remember when he traded a 1st to get rid of malakov?
This. Clowe will get another concussion and miss most of the season anyway. I wish NJ had one more buyout so they could get rid of Clowe, but I doubt Lou would use it on someone who just signed a year ago and has 4 years remaining.
No, I don't think you are remembering correctly. I think at the time Rolston's contract was right in line with what he was expected to get - I said 'That is what you pay for making a splash on the UFA market'. If Winky does anything, it's a good signing.
I don't have to exclude anything. Kovy was a brilliant coup and Lou made the deal. So you're saying it was Lou that made the deal? ok.
How about Schneider? gave up a top ten pick for a backup goalie that has yet to play a full season and has won 1 playoff game and has two years left on a deal and will split time for half that time. Thus leaving mgt with a still unproven goalie that they need to sign.
How about resigning Elias, Henrique, Greene, etc? Elias was a layup. He was never going anywhere. As for Henrique. He actually bought out multiple RFA years when the kid had not proven himself. He should have never signed him to that deal at the time. Henrique had done nothing to prove he was ever worth buying out what I think was maybe 4 years of RFA. Absurd.
How about dodging the Clarkson bullet? He didn't doge any bullet. He knew Clarkson was going to look for max money from the start of the season. he blew that one by not moving him at the deadline. A blind man could see Clarkie wasn't coming back. Again, should have been dealt.
Brunner could have been a good move if he doesn't get hurt. This one is not worth commenting on. The guy had zero interest on the FA market. Somehow Lou got stuck with him. I wouldn't tout this as a plus at all.
How about our whole 4th line that helped carry us to the cup final? If anyone gets credit/ or criticism for the 4th line it's Deboer.
How about the defensemen we drafted? Please name one that has played a FULL season in the NHL.
Zids for pucks, Jagr, I gave you Zids anf Jags
At the time... how about Salvador for Cam Janssen? Wasn't there a pick involved in this deal. Not sure.
geez - other than not being able to move the state of Minnesota to NJ, what do you have that isn't Monday morning QBing?
Very good news. I like Volch better than Salvador but I guess Lou didn't want to waive his captain. Happy this happened today.
Then again, you're right. Things are peachy.
This. Clowe will get another concussion and miss most of the season anyway. I wish NJ had one more buyout so they could get rid of Clowe, but I doubt Lou would use it on someone who just signed a year ago and has 4 years remaining.
His contract would still stay on the cap I believe. The flyers still have Pronger on their cap.
He couldn't use the compliance buyout on Clowe because his contract was signed after the lockout. It would be a regular buyout that would count toward the cap
Guess Lou had no takers for him. Thank goodness he wised up. Now let's dump Harrold.
Thank God.
Now upgrade the forward group and I'll begin to get excited again.
I am pumped that vol has beenbought out. Everyone and there mother knew that lou had to do something to arrange more room on the back end. Why does lou have to play the games with the fans all the time...frustrates me as a fan. The buy-out is not the final answer. Lou has some hard choices to make, make more room or leave as is. Personally I would leave as is just in case the young demn have problems with there second full years.