GDT: Devils and Lightning fight for things and stuff

[mtnet]

We have an acting GM, an acting coach and have no idea what’s coming next.

Only thing left is to address the locker room situation with some Tough Actin' Tinactin

 

[GameSeven]

Yes, there was a slight love tap by Coleman on the goalie but he did his best to avoid contact and he was outside of the crease and the goalie was at the top of the crease. There's bound to be some slight contact when a player crashes the net. As long as it doesn't impede the goalie from making the save, which Coleman didn't do, it shouldn't be waived off as goalie interference.







That lightning player is 100% reason the goalie couldn't get across to the other side. Gusev literally didn't even shoot yet while Coleman was nowhere near the goalie. Was absolute b.s call.

The only thing I can possibly think of is the slight contact by Coleman caused the goalie to lose his balance or some b.s like that. I can see it being interpreted like that the way the goalie flopped around lol.

Edit: Yea, I'm this pissed about it that I went back to do this.

It was close, and I feel like we've been burned on equal situations that have gone against us, but this was the right call. The worst of the obstruction is caused by the Bolts player, but Coleman can't stop before entering the crease and does make incidental contact before he's hit.

I would have loved to see the goal count because of Gusev's increasingly impressive skills and patience on the play, but I think it was the right call.

 

[Devils Army]

It was close, and I feel like we've been burned on equal situations that have gone against us, but this was the right call. The worst of the obstruction is caused by the Bolts player, but Coleman can't stop before entering the crease and does make incidental contact before he's hit.

I would have loved to see the goal count because of Gusev's increasingly impressive skills and patience on the play, but I think it was the right call.

Yeah i think what they looked for was that Coleman initiated contact as in he was made contact before the Tampa player and even if its slight they'll overturn that.

 

[Blackjack]

Edit: Yea, I'm this pissed about it that I went back to do this.

Yeah, it's not that they took away a goal, it's that they erased one of the most beautiful goals the team scored all season!

 

[Nubmer6]

Yes, there was a slight love tap by Coleman on the goalie but he did his best to avoid contact and he was outside of the crease and the goalie was at the top of the crease. There's bound to be some slight contact when a player crashes the net. As long as it doesn't impede the goalie from making the save, which Coleman didn't do, it shouldn't be waived off as goalie interference.







That lightning player is 100% reason the goalie couldn't get across to the other side. Gusev literally didn't even shoot yet while Coleman was nowhere near the goalie. Was absolute b.s call.

The only thing I can possibly think of is the slight contact by Coleman caused the goalie to lose his balance or some b.s like that. I can see it being interpreted like that the way the goalie flopped around lol.

Edit: Yea, I'm this pissed about it that I went back to do this.

After coming home to watch the replay, I agree with the call. The overhead shot makes it a bit clearer. Blake was leading with his skate trying to stop. Their goalie was sliding across and clipped Coleman's skate in the crease, stopping his slide across.

Either way, I don't care anymore. We won

 

[glenwo2]

Yes, there was a slight love tap by Coleman on the goalie but he did his best to avoid contact and he was outside of the crease and the goalie was at the top of the crease. There's bound to be some slight contact when a player crashes the net. As long as it doesn't impede the goalie from making the save, which Coleman didn't do, it shouldn't be waived off as goalie interference.







That lightning player is 100% reason the goalie couldn't get across to the other side. Gusev literally didn't even shoot yet while Coleman was nowhere near the goalie. Was absolute b.s call.

The only thing I can possibly think of is the slight contact by Coleman caused the goalie to lose his balance or some b.s like that. I can see it being interpreted like that the way the goalie flopped around lol.

Edit: Yea, I'm this pissed about it that I went back to do this.

I'm grateful that it didn't wind up costing us.

I immediately thought "oh great. Watch this f***ing Bolts team come and tie it now!".


I would be even more pissed if it led to a loss.

As it is, it's merely f'n ANNOYING 'cause it deprived us of a Highlight-Reel goal by Goose.

Hell..screw it...THAT WAS A GOAL SO I'M GOING TO COUNT IT IN HIS TOTAL GOALS OVERALL 'CAUSE F*** THE REFS AND TORONTO!!!

And I don't agree with the last 3 posters above who say it was the right call. Bullcrap.

 

[Nubmer6]

I'm grateful that it didn't wind up costing us.

I immediately thought "oh great. Watch this f***ing Bolts team come and tie it now!".


I would be even more pissed if it led to a loss.

As it is, it's merely f'n ANNOYING 'cause it deprived us of a Highlight-Reel goal by Goose.

Hell..screw it...THAT WAS A GOAL SO I'M GOING TO COUNT IT IN HIS TOTAL GOALS OVERALL 'CAUSE F*** THE REFS AND TORONTO!!!

And I don't agree with the last 3 posters above who say it was the right call. Bullcrap.

Ya know... There's a number of decaffeinated brands out on the market just as tasty as the real thing

 

[glenwo2]

Ya know... There's a number of decaffeinated brands out on the market just as tasty as the real thing