Yes it’s crazy talk. If anything this season has been a stress test.Except any competent GM will argue that 53 meaningless games in a weirdo/bullsh*t season doesn't constitute an accurate enough sample size to award a player, under team control for the foreseeable future, a 3+ year deal at 4m+ per year. That's absolutely crazy talk imo.
whoever suggested protecting mcleod over zacha is out to lunch
That is one way to show you are a sharp GM. Look at how much Sakic signing MacK to his long term deal before he broke out has helped the Avs. Obviously Shara is no MacK but if the organization projects him to be productive 2nd line type moving forward a small risk now could pay big dividends a few years down the road.Well I want to sign Shara to a long term deal, isn't that the point of having cap space, to sign key young players off ELCs to long term deals? Don't we regret the Bratt bridge already?
They are trying to use a formula which is very difficult now since it is so hard to project what the cap will be down the road. They were high on their projections last year, not surprisingly. There will be more variance due to different organizations probably having different projections as to what the cap will be a few years down the road.does that contract projection for Sharangovich also factor in his KHL goal scoring totals or no?
Im much more concerned about what the backend is going to look like next year. What are your thoughts on that?So this is what we're currently looking at at forward......
TOP 6 CENTERS- Jack Hughes, Nico Hischier
TOP 6 WINGERS- Jesper Bratt, Yegor Sharangovich, Pavel Zacha
BOTTOM 6 CENTERS- Michael McLeod, Jesper Boqvist, Mikhail Maltsev
BOTTOM 6 WINGERS- Janne Kuokkanen, Miles Wood, Nate Bastian, Andreas Johnsson (hes here until he isn't)
Ideally, this offseason we sign a 3C and acquire another legit top 6 winger somehow (trade/signing). Those moves plus the development of guys like Foote, Holtz, Clarke, Mercer I think puts our forward corps into the good category
Im much more concerned about what the backend is going to look like next year. What are your thoughts on that?
Just so we can argue about it on here...duuuhIf Zacha's knee is so banged up he can neither practice or play for his national team, why would he be playing tonight?
So this is what we're currently looking at at forward......
TOP 6 CENTERS- Jack Hughes, Nico Hischier
TOP 6 WINGERS- Jesper Bratt, Yegor Sharangovich, Pavel Zacha
BOTTOM 6 CENTERS- Michael McLeod, Jesper Boqvist, Mikhail Maltsev
BOTTOM 6 WINGERS- Janne Kuokkanen, Miles Wood, Nate Bastian, Andreas Johnsson (hes here until he isn't)
Ideally, this offseason we sign a 3C and acquire another legit top 6 winger somehow (trade/signing). Those moves plus the development of guys like Foote, Holtz, Clarke, Mercer I think puts our forward corps into the good category
Foote will be an older D+3 and Holtz and Mercer will be older D+2s . If the organization projects any of these guys as top six wings I'm not sure how much sense it makes to add another one. I also think the organization probably sees Kuokkanen as a top six wing. He's in a scoring slump, but was one of the strongest players on the team for a while.
I definitely agree on adding another center. Danault or RNH type that can slot up when Jack or Nico are injured.
Foote will be an older D+3 and Holtz and Mercer will be older D+2s . If the organization projects any of these guys as top six wings I'm not sure how much sense it makes to add another one. I also think the organization probably sees Kuokkanen as a top six wing. He's in a scoring slump, but was one of the strongest players on the team for a while.
I definitely agree on adding another center. Danault or RNH type that can slot up when Jack or Nico are injured.
While Sharangovich could certainly play top-6 and not look out of place, I would love for him and Kuokkanen to be flanking one of the best 3rd lines in hockey. I would want the team to look something like this:
(A)-Hughes-(B)
Zacha-Hischier-Bratt
Sharangovich-(C)-Kuokkanen
Wood-McLeod-Bastian
In the long-term, (A) and (B) being some combination of Holtz/Mercer/Foote/1st 2021 (but in the meantime we could fill one of those holes with trade/UFA) and (C) being a veteran UFA center in the mold of a Brian Boyle.
Merkley, Boqvist, and Maltsev are the odd ones out. Merks is as good as gone, Malts still needs some work in the AHL but is a fine call up and could replace Bastian if he's claimed in the ED, and IMO Boqvist would best be used as trade bait.
That is what he did this year and IMO that should be his role going forward. He started on Mikey's line, went to the Zacha line, played well with Zajac and finished up with Hughes. IMO he should be looked at as our "utility knife" wing.Kuokkanen is 2nd on the team in 5v5 P/60 and 2nd in raw 5v5 pts this year. I think he's a guy who you move around the line up and slot him wherever he's need.
Didn't Danault turn down like a 5x6 deal or something from Montreal? I can't see him signing on to a 3C. Same goes for Nuge. Both of those guys will want bigger roles
That is one way to show you are a sharp GM. Look at how much Sakic signing MacK to his long term deal before he broke out has helped the Avs. Obviously Shara is no MacK but if the organization projects him to be productive 2nd line type moving forward a small risk now could pay big dividends a few years down the road.
Perhaps he would be more inclined to take a team friendly deal once we draft baby bro?They got a bit lucky that McKinnon started his career slow, the comparable player NJ has to sign to McKinnon would be Hughes imo, and my dream this offseason is Fitz signs him to an 8 year extension (to start after 2021-22 season ends). My guess is Hughes and his family are too savvy to ever agree to it but that's the dream offseason contract to sign imo.
Kuokkanen is 2nd on the team in 5v5 P/60 and 2nd in raw 5v5 pts this year. I think he's a guy who you move around the line up and slot him wherever he's need.
Didn't Danault turn down like a 5x6 deal or something from Montreal? I can't see him signing on to a 3C. Same goes for Nuge. Both of those guys will want bigger roles
I've heard that bit about Danault and RNH not wanting to be a 3c, but if they're getting power play opportunities, ice time, and quality wingers, does it matter so much if they're a nominal "3c"? Don't players want to play with other good players?
I know Jack and Nico were 1OAs, but they're not Crosby and Malkin, there's a lot of room for another center.
Thats what Im hoping forPerhaps he would be more inclined to take a team friendly deal once we draft baby bro?
Unless Graeme becomes a superstar and then he takes a team friendly deal when we draft Brandt...it’s a win/win lolThats what Im hoping for