The quote reads to me like it’s over but it’s ambiguous. The league announced a bunch of trade tweaks already so I would have expected it announced then; unless the league told the Devils to wait to see if it mattered.
31 Thoughts: How will Dubas handle Maple Leafs’ off-season? - Sportsnet.ca
25. The optimist is thrilled because New Jersey has three first-rounders in a deep draft: theirs, Arizona’s and Vancouver’s. The pessimist thinks: Man, we could have done better. Arizona’s first-rounder in the Taylor Hall deal was top-three protected, and the Coyotes’ victory over Nashville erased the Devils’ possibility of a second lottery selection. (New Jersey appealed to the NHL about this, saying Return to Play guidelines devalued the Devils’ return in the original trade.)
As for the Canucks’ selection, I’m betting Jersey would have happily gambled to see what occurred next season. If Vancouver missed the playoffs this season, the Devils got their number one next year no matter what.
Thank you!!! Zadarov makes way too many bonehead plays. He will be in the doghouse immediately here but people are obsessed with his size and the fact that he can completely take himself out of the play to go for a hitGuys. Zadorov sucks
First off, welcome.
Secondly, did you forget that the Devils used their cap space to acquire PK Subban literally on that same day? They also had used their cap space a few years back to acquire a free 2nd round pick for taking Marc Savard.
Carolina has made some shrewd moves the past few years that I am certainly jealous of, but still.
No of course I did not forget that. But I don't see those two moves having anything to do with this. The Devils still possess the largest amount of cap space in the NHL even after taking Subban and Savard... and being that we have been sold, again, on weaponizing cap space as maybe the #1 asset for the team build moving forward, its confusing as to how this was missed - being that a 1st Round pick is unquestionably significant asset and the space needed to acquire it was open and was left open for the reminder of the year (i.e. wasted).
He’s not that good. I’m not a big fan of the player. The majority of players at every position on this team have sucked over the last decade. He’d be fine at the right price if he was acquired for nothing. He plays a role on a team that is significantly better than us. At least he’s not a midget.Guys. Zadorov sucks
I edited my post
the Gusev trade was an example of taking advantage of Vegas' cap constraints. The Palmieri trade was an example of taking advantage of Anaheim's cap constraints. Their GM even said at the time of the trade that he knew they were not going to be able to afford Palmieri.
so yes, there have been some moves that other teams made that we were not involved in. But lets not act like we haven't used the cap space whatsoever.
Certainly didn't mean to imply that it hasn't been used "whatsoever". This however is a prime asset that was essentially traded for cap space and cash alone. Those other deals you mentioned outside of Savard had prime assets going in the other direction, namely 2nd Rd picks. This was a 1st Rd pick available for cash and the Devils either passed on, chose not to pursue or were not aware of. Either way not good.
I think its fair to guess that Toronto would rather have dealt with Devils if given the choice rather than a rising intra-division rival. So its just frustrating.
I admitted in my first post that I'm completely triggered by the speed of the Rangers rebuild relative to the Devils, and I look at this #13 pick and it makes me very frustrated.
Not to mention that the Rangers would have missed the playoffs this year if not for COVID. I really do not get all this jealousy of a non-playoff team.the Rangers rebuild "speed" is mainly because of all their extra first round picks the past few years due to having players worthy of selling. I brought this up the other day, but they had:
2 firsts in 2017 (their own and Arizona's from trading Stepan and Raanta)
3 firsts in 2018 (their own, Boston's from trading Rick Nash and Tampa's from trading Ryan McDonagh/JT Miller)
2 firsts in 2019 (their own and then they traded Winnipeg's back to them for Trouba, which they acquired from dealing Hayes)
2 firsts in 2020 (their own and then the one you brought up that they acquired from Carolina for Skjei)
the Devils simply did not have those types of players to sell until this year of course with Hall and Coleman. That is why the Rangers rebuild has seemingly "accelerated". It also helps to jump up 10+ spots and win lotteries in consecutive years, but we can't complain much about that aspect.
the Rangers rebuild "speed" is mainly because of all their extra first round picks the past few years due to having players worthy of selling. I brought this up the other day, but they had:
2 firsts in 2017 (their own and Arizona's from trading Stepan and Raanta)
3 firsts in 2018 (their own, Boston's from trading Rick Nash and Tampa's from trading Ryan McDonagh/JT Miller)
2 firsts in 2019 (their own and then they traded Winnipeg's back to them for Trouba, which they acquired from dealing Hayes)
2 firsts in 2020 (their own and then the one you brought up that they acquired from Carolina for Skjei)
the Devils simply did not have those types of players to sell until this year of course with Hall and Coleman. That is why the Rangers rebuild has seemingly "accelerated". It also helps to jump up 10+ spots and win lotteries in consecutive years, but we can't complain much about that aspect.
Hindsight is everything and now that the pick turned out to be #13 it looks like we really missed out. At the time, most people thought the pick would be late 20s
Looks like you need to spend some time with a bottle to forget all these troublesTrue but all would still apply to a pick in the late 20's. Several of the picks the rangers acquired that accelerated their rebuild ahead of the devils were picks in the 20's right. Really no justification for this other than simply acknowledging that the cap space asset has been oversold to us and the urgency to move the rebuild forward is and has been greater in Manhattan than it has been in Newark. Way I see it.
I just don’t want to go down this rabbit hole using this logic of what could have been... what could have been if we never traded for Cory. What could have been if took provorov and petterssonTrue but all would still apply to a pick in the late 20's. Several of the picks the rangers acquired that accelerated their rebuild ahead of the devils were picks in the 20's right. Really no justification for this other than simply acknowledging that the cap space asset has been oversold to us and the urgency to move the rebuild forward is and has been greater in Manhattan than it has been in Newark. Way I see it.