Devils 2019 offseason team discussion (news and notes) II

Status
Not open for further replies.

MadDevil

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2007
33,851
23,744
Bismarck, ND
Comparing Mueller and Butcher is kind of apples to oranges given their skillsets. They both played the same amount at even strength, with Butcher getting a bunch of PP time (as he should) and Mueller getting some PK time. I don't know as if I'd consider either of them a top 4 defenseman. Butcher has some physical limitations, while I think Mueller has some mental limitations. If we could put Butcher's brain into Mueller's body we'd have a legit top 4 (maybe even top pairing) defenseman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Whaddagoal

Bcap88

Ruff season that’s for sure
Aug 12, 2011
9,212
7,990
Chicago
So if a player plays well in limited time - they dont deserve more.... because they were already playing limited time?

How the hell is any defenseman supposed to prove themselves with that mentality?

On top of that, its simply wrong to think Mueller has been poor in the time hes had. Defensively he has been practically the best minus Lovejoy’s insane PKing last year and Greenems blocked shots

ATOI 18 and he spent plenty of games playing well over 19+. Without Hynes pulling him every other game for rotation of guys (since the season was ****), hed have been playing 19+ every game. Not to mention he played around 19+ average for the first 20 games and then **** hit the fan so it was a combination of rotations and Hynes being Hynes, plus injuries

He most certainly can be a #4 IMO and has been when given the chance - yet each time an injury arrives or the team plummets and Hynes starts trying everything
You are missing the point, to bank on a guy to handle top 4 minutes when he’s been injured,scratched for most of his time here is not conducive to success.
 

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
67,439
31,778
Well its not known yet so its a maybe as of now.

Butcher's RFA, not UFA. Sure he 'might' be traded but so could almost anyone else under contract or team control.

You are missing the point, to bank on a guy to handle top 4 minutes when he’s been injured,scratched for most of his time here is not conducive to success.

Not to mention being a completely one-dimensional player. Mueller's below a zero offensively. If you're going to have three goals and 21 points in 135 NHL games you better be awesome defensively to stick. Two years ago he was at least above average defensively, this year he was just meh in part I think because he lost his confidence after the benchings but still when you get half a chance you gotta take advantage of it and even the best Mueller is extremely limited.
 

SteveCangialosi123

Registered User
Feb 17, 2012
28,160
48,567
NJ
I wouldn’t say Mueller sucks, but he’s a dime a dozen player that doesn’t offer much. The team is much better with Butcher on the ice.

I’m starting to question Vatanen’s long term outlook with the Devils. He’s a UFA next year, he’s had injury troubles, he’s small, offensively minded like most of our d prospects. He’ll probably get a deal he isn’t worth.

The only guys I think will definitely be here in 2 years are Severson, Butcher, and Smith.
 

Azathoth

Registered User
May 25, 2017
3,773
2,340
Centre of Chaos
I think butcher’s defense gets a bit underrated by devils fans (elsewhere more than here). Who cares if he’s not a super fast skater. He’s usually good positionally and doesn’t have a lot of mental lapses that other guys are prone to. I think he could handle a 3/4 role next year with the right partner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tretyak 20

Emperoreddy

Show Me What You Got!
Apr 13, 2010
130,484
76,043
New Jersey, Exit 16E
I wouldn’t say Mueller sucks, but he’s a dime a dozen player that doesn’t offer much. The team is much better with Butcher on the ice.

I’m starting to question Vatanen’s long term outlook with the Devils. He’s a UFA next year, he’s had injury troubles, he’s small, offensively minded like most of our d prospects. He’ll probably get a deal he isn’t worth.

The only guys I think will definitely be here in 2 years are Severson, Butcher, and Smith.

We don’t really have any depth options on the right side prospect wise outside of Walsh.

So unless we make another major move, we really do need Vats.
 

tr83

Nope, still embarassed
Oct 14, 2013
14,602
3,693
Jersey Shore
If Mueller and Butcher were combined to make one guy, they would make a good defenseman.

That said, their flaws are so evident, both make fringe NHL players. Butcher will be more valued as offense is preferred on the backend on this team and on most teams in the league. Mueller will probably be nothing more than a 7D fill-in for when teams play bigger teams like Winnipeg, Washington, or Columbus.
 

SteveCangialosi123

Registered User
Feb 17, 2012
28,160
48,567
NJ
We don’t really have any depth options on the right side prospect wise outside of Walsh.

So unless we make another major move, we really do need Vats.
We need to make multiple significant moves even if we don’t move on from Vatanen if we want to compete. Subban seems like a perfect option. He wasn’t great last year and is past his prime, but we’re a team that can comfortably fit his deal under the cap for the next 3 years.
 

Emperoreddy

Show Me What You Got!
Apr 13, 2010
130,484
76,043
New Jersey, Exit 16E
We need to make multiple significant moves even if we don’t move on from Vatanen if we want to compete. Subban seems like a perfect option. He wasn’t great last year and is past his prime, but we’re a team that can comfortably fit his deal under the cap for the next 3 years.

I would give my left arm if it convinced EK to sign here.
 

MartyOwns

thank you shero
Apr 1, 2007
24,239
18,105
If Mueller and Butcher were combined to make one guy, they would make a good defenseman.

That said, their flaws are so evident, both make fringe NHL players. Butcher will be more valued as offense is preferred on the backend on this team and on most teams in the league. Mueller will probably be nothing more than a 7D fill-in for when teams play bigger teams like Winnipeg, Washington, or Columbus.

sorry but butcher is not a fringe nhl player. mueller, that’s probably correct
 

Scooooooooooooot

Registered User
Jul 31, 2018
2,333
1,628
Damon Severson put up 39 points in a year where we stunk and a lot of people are trying to leverage his value into a trade as a 24 year offensive defenseman... why is it unreasonable to think the same with Will Butcher, who is a 24 year old offensive defenseman.
 

Camille the Eel

Registered User
I think Butcher is a fine defenseman, he's not a liability in his own zone like he is made out to be
His problems are more in transition. The weaknesses or mistakes have involved getting caught up ice without the foot speed necessary to get back into the play. Of course he’s relatively small. So in breaking up a forecheck in our end, he’s got to deal with that.

But - and I should have started here - Butcher grew a lot defensively this year. His positioning, staying on the right side of the play, and use of his body to block guys off along the boards were all so much better than in his rookie year. He’s quite good and a positive asset.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tretyak 20

Ripshot 43

Registered User
Jul 21, 2010
13,792
10,605
Unless he's packaged for a massive upgrade that crashes this board, Butcher isn't going anywhere.

XXX - Severson
Smith - Vatanen
Greene - Butcher

... is where we should be.

This I see as realistically ideal and without an upgrade we see Greene playing 1st pairing again with whoever picking up 3rd pairing duties (Davies, Muller, Butcher, Carrick)
 

ChicksDigTheTrap

No quick fixes, no cutting corners and no cheating
Sep 16, 2018
4,930
5,213
Springsteen Country
We need to make multiple significant moves even if we don’t move on from Vatanen if we want to compete. Subban seems like a perfect option. He wasn’t great last year and is past his prime, but we’re a team that can comfortably fit his deal under the cap for the next 3 years.
Given Shero's comments at his press conference after he got his extension I doubt he would be making multiple significant m0ves on "D". I am not one to try and twist words from GM's/athletes but when he comments that even good teams in this era do not have 6 good defenseman I would be surprised if he has plans to put assets into a 30 year old declining PK Subban.
 
Last edited:

SpeakingOfTheDevils

Devils Advocate
Jan 22, 2010
15,645
7,882
Philadelphia, PA
This I see as realistically ideal and without an upgrade we see Greene playing 1st pairing again with whoever picking up 3rd pairing duties (Davies, Muller, Butcher, Carrick)

I'd be shocked if Shero doesn't acquire a defenseman for the left side. I don't think we'll need to worry about Greene potentially playing on the top pair.
 

Ripshot 43

Registered User
Jul 21, 2010
13,792
10,605
I'd be shocked if Shero doesn't acquire a defenseman for the left side. I don't think we'll need to worry about Greene potentially playing on the top pair.

I would be shocked if he isnt trying but actually acquiring someone for the top pair is a different story. Takes 2 to tango and all that jazz and if we do acquire someone to play on the top pairing, we will be giving up a boatload of futures.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad