filinski77
Registered User
- Feb 12, 2017
- 2,621
- 4,304
No, the Kovalchuk one looks way better in your office!Should I get my Kovalchuk jersey nameplate changed to Agostino now? It's been sitting in my closet for 5 years and hasn't moved.
No, the Kovalchuk one looks way better in your office!Should I get my Kovalchuk jersey nameplate changed to Agostino now? It's been sitting in my closet for 5 years and hasn't moved.
That's fair.
Peoples opinions of Sev's swing pretty wide. I think he's OK. I'd like to see him with a better partner for sure. Moore and old man Greene? Yeah, a better partner would be nice.
frk was put on waivers today. i’d rather have him on our fourth line than some of the garbage we’ve trotted out
Zone start is just pure scraping of the NHL data. Take all the faceoffs a player is on the ice for, sort them by neutral zone/offensive zone/defensive zone, and there's zone start. The problem with this is that a player will sometimes be on for multiple faceoffs - all of those are 'zone starts' even though the shift didn't technically start with the 2nd faceoff.
I sure as **** do not trust Hynes and Nas to develop Smith, Davies or Walsh properly.
That's my initial instinct as well as I also like to gamble, but I'd want to lock him up for like 7 years and I just don't think he's earned a 4-5M AAV for that long. I'd almost give him a 1 year bridge to see if he can score 20 goals/50 points and then give him the big long-term deal. 2 years seems too risky as I feel he's getting close to breaking out and he's the type of player who will be really good once he finds consistency.
I've been saying this since the offseason with regard to 20 and ppl laughed. It still might not happen but I'm here for the gloating when it does.He might score 20 goals this season. He is only 9 away.
Honestly I would be more worried about getting burned on a bridge deal then getting burned on a long term one.
I dont see how any of this is a "problem" with the stat. If a coach has defensive confidence in a player, he's going to put them out for more DZS. At 4 games into a season there wont be enough data, but if you look at those hundreds of data points deep into the season, it becomes clear who a coach thinks his best and worst defensive defensemen are. If you pick any team in the NHL, generally speaking you're going to see the same pattern, the best regarded defensemen will tend to have a solid > 50% DZS. Of course, really crappy teams will also have higher > 50% figures as well, but even then the relationship should hold, that on a crappy defensive team (like the Devils), the D that the coach relies on more defensively will have a solid DZS figure.
Additional to all of this, and to be used as more circumstantial evidence to my argument, why do you suppose Butcher is the only Devils defesenman who is never used while Shorthanded?
As a stand alone stat I do think zone starts are a pretty flawed.
But they are a pretty good indicator as to usage. A guy who get's a high percentage of o-zone starts is likely getting easy assignments all around. A guy who gets a ton of d-zone starts is likely getting the tough assigments.
As does PK time.Which is exactly what I'm suggesting. It shows what the coaching staff thinks of a player defensively. As does their shorthanded usage.
Heaven help him.Cory gets the start tomorrow.
Heaven help him.
He’ll battle through it.He'd be wise to hide a cyanide pill in his blocker.
There are certainly parts of Sev's games one would have hoped he would have cleaned up by now.I mean most dman would look better with a better partner.
What is worrying is Severson hasn't been able to fix his OWN issues.