Devils 2018-19 team discussion (news and notes) part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.

Call Me Al

Registered User
Aug 28, 2017
5,582
6,959
considering how the rest of the division is doing and the devils games in hand, the season is not sunk based on this stretch and we are not st a point where we are playing catch up. it’s the games going forward that count
 

BahlDeep

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 29, 2008
16,726
6,860
Montreal
We are at a crossroads in the season already.

A bad stretch of 5 losses out of 7 can sink the season.

We don't have enough firepower to play catch up in the standings.

I mean you still tried to predict the flyers would make the playoffs after they lost 9 straight 2 seasons ago, but whatever

Same goes for the Panthers last year.
 

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
oh i was very clear about that, i also didn’t want to pick up any pricey UFA’s (would’ve been happy if we kicked the tires on de haan but not a big deal). i wanted us to stay the course, hopefully get a good draft position and continue to stock the pond. but, i knew that meant a potentially rough season...which was fine. i lowered my expectations accordingly.

one thing i didn’t anticipate was this seeming lack of effort- we haven’t played 60 solid minutes of hockey in a very long time. to me, that’s more concerning than this **** roster

I think that is a function of human nature. It’s not feasible to stay keyed up all the time. That’s why coaches like Keenan and Torts don’t last. They push people beyond what they can do and then they turn off the message. That’s why football teams swing so up and down year to year. If you rely on emotion and outworking the opponent as the means of wining you can only sustain it for so long. At some point you have to be able to win in other ways or be god enough you can win when your team is at 75% like NJ is now. They need talent in the worst way. They can use a full second line (maybe Bratt helps there) and a true number one defender but that will take time. They will get their second wind and start winning again but they won’t win many games when they aren’t at their best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChicksDigTheTrap

Zajacs Bowl Cut

Lets Go Baby
Nov 6, 2005
71,971
44,607
PA
33-25-8 is 33 wins and 33 losses

thats .500. The fact that the NHL awards a loser point is a different discussion.
 

Cult of Hynes

Hynes is never wrong.
Nov 9, 2010
13,369
2,979
*whispers*

33-25-8 IS .500....

We're below 500 right now and are coughing up leads when we have them. Last year this team could at least fight back while down, this team hasn't even shown they can hold a lead recently let alone come back and fight.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
66,192
28,543
Only 2 solutions left as I see it:

1. A major trade

2. Fire the coaching staff

Or just give up and play for the draft.
 

ChicksDigTheTrap

No quick fixes, no cutting corners and no cheating
Sep 16, 2018
4,930
5,214
Springsteen Country
The only players I see as in the core right now are Hall, Nico, Palms, Bratt, Wood, Coleman, Vats, Sevs, Butcher and Mueller. Greene and Zajac are solid players but are not long term core guys due to age.

We really need some of Zacha, Quenneville, Seney, McLeod, Anderson, Speers, Boqvist, Zetterlund, Studenic, Gignac and Talvitie to develop.

Looks like Ty Smith is the real deal and there are a few other young D coming like Walsh. Plus Santini should replace Lovejoy next year.

If MarJo doesn’t show anything we basically have a 1st line, Bratter and a 3rd line. This is what a rebuild looks like.

Good news is we have good cap room and a ton of young players and prospects. All depends on how they develop and what moves Shero makes. It’s not all gloom and doom. It’s not a bad place to be in but it’s still the beginning of working back to relevance.
This. Building a cup contender takes time. Bad drafting sets you back. I think the long term looks good for the Devils. Last nights lineup card on the other hand...….
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
66,192
28,543
This. Building a cup contender takes time. Bad drafting sets you back. I think the long term looks good for the Devils. Last nights lineup card on the other hand...….
This is why I kept complaining about all the 2nd and 3rd round picks we wasted over the last year.

Just the picks in the Johansson, Maroon and Grabner deals are practically an entire draft year worth of prospects.

Maroon 2019 3rd
Grabner 2018 2nd
Johansson 2018 2nd and 2018 3rd
We gave a 2018 3rd in the Vatanen deal

That's 5 top 100 picks.

You don't do that if you're a rebuilding team, especially on the rentals... I could understand on Vatanen and Johansson cause you think that they could become part of a long term plan...but thats still a lot of picks without a lot to show for it
 

OmNomNom

Taco is Love, Taco is Life
Mar 3, 2011
22,992
15,852
In the Church of Salmela
This is why I kept complaining about all the 2nd and 3rd round picks we wasted over the last year.

Just the picks in the Johansson, Maroon and Grabner deals are practically an entire draft year worth of prospects.

Maroon 2019 3rd
Grabner 2018 2nd
Johansson 2018 2nd and 2018 3rd
We gave a 2018 3rd in the Vatanen deal

That's 5 top 100 picks.

You don't do that if you're a rebuilding team, especially on the rentals... I could understand on Vatanen and Johansson cause you think that they could become part of a long term plan...but thats still a lot of picks without a lot to show for it
johansson and vatanen were worth it, since they're actually players
maroon would've been a top 9 player if he wasn't called home
grabner is a stupid anomaly who couldn't make it work here, but if he had, we might've had a different outcome in the playoffs

the logic behind the trades aren't stupid, at least
 

jkrdevil

UnRegistered User
Apr 24, 2006
42,850
12,742
Miami
This is why I kept complaining about all the 2nd and 3rd round picks we wasted over the last year.

Just the picks in the Johansson, Maroon and Grabner deals are practically an entire draft year worth of prospects.

Maroon 2019 3rd
Grabner 2018 2nd
Johansson 2018 2nd and 2018 3rd
We gave a 2018 3rd in the Vatanen deal

That's 5 top 100 picks.

You don't do that if you're a rebuilding team, especially on the rentals... I could understand on Vatanen and Johansson cause you think that they could become part of a long term plan...but thats still a lot of picks without a lot to show for it

The Maroon trade right now is preventing us to make a serious play at Nylander. We would be able to offer sheet Nylander and given the Leafs cap situation they might not match.

However, without our our own third (and Philly now owns it so we aren’t going to be able to get it back) the only conceivable offer sheet is 4 first round pick, which is wasted capital IMO.

And we probably don’t have the prospect assists to make a trade with the Leafs.
 

Zajacs Bowl Cut

Lets Go Baby
Nov 6, 2005
71,971
44,607
PA
The Maroon trade right now is preventing us to make a serious play at Nylander. We would be able to offer sheet Nylander and given the Leafs cap situation they might not match.

However, without our our own third (and Philly now owns it so we aren’t going to be able to get it back) the only conceivable offer sheet is 4 first round pick, which is wasted capital IMO.

And we probably don’t have the prospect assists to make a trade with the Leafs.

just nonsense

we have absolutely nothing to believe Shero would offer sheet anyone

talk about making something out of nothing
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blender

jkrdevil

UnRegistered User
Apr 24, 2006
42,850
12,742
Miami
more of an observation that criticism. They probably don’t give an offer sheet, but it is leverage if you get into trade talks.

Still Shero would have to have a crystal ball to know how it played out. And if Edmonton doesn’t end up flipping it to Philly would could make a deal to get it back
 

Blender

Registered User
Dec 2, 2009
51,440
45,319
This is why I kept complaining about all the 2nd and 3rd round picks we wasted over the last year.

Just the picks in the Johansson, Maroon and Grabner deals are practically an entire draft year worth of prospects.

Maroon 2019 3rd
Grabner 2018 2nd
Johansson 2018 2nd and 2018 3rd
We gave a 2018 3rd in the Vatanen deal

That's 5 top 100 picks.

You don't do that if you're a rebuilding team, especially on the rentals... I could understand on Vatanen and Johansson cause you think that they could become part of a long term plan...but thats still a lot of picks without a lot to show for it
Meh, Vatanen has been a good trade. Maroon was an excellent trade that helped get us in the playoffs, and Shero tried hard to keep him but he went to St. Louis on a bargain for his kid. Grabner was a bust worse than even the detractors at the time thought he would be. Johansson trade hasn't worked out so far with all his injuries and his lackluster play.
 

MadDevil

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2007
33,854
23,751
Bismarck, ND
Only 2 solutions left as I see it:

1. A major trade

2. Fire the coaching staff

Or just give up and play for the draft.

Or players who aren't playing well now could play better. Or we could stop taking a bunch of dumb penalties. Or making dumb mental errors. It seems weird how pretty much the exact same roster as last year is somehow written off after a bad 7 games.
 

Hischier and Hughes

“I love to hockey”
Jan 28, 2018
9,408
4,357
Or players who aren't playing well now could play better. Or we could stop taking a bunch of dumb penalties. Or making dumb mental errors. It seems weird how pretty much the exact same roster as last year is somehow written off after a bad 7 games.
A lot of people around the league and some NJ fans think last season was a fluke

Id like a trade for a top 6 guy either way, whether we are in a slump or the team is this bad. Only way I dont want a trade is if we end up like really really bad this year (which i doubt), then sell off a few guys and go for first overall lol
 

Billdo

Registered User
Oct 28, 2008
19,483
16,382
Ocean County
The Maroon trade right now is preventing us to make a serious play at Nylander. We would be able to offer sheet Nylander and given the Leafs cap situation they might not match.

However, without our our own third (and Philly now owns it so we aren’t going to be able to get it back) the only conceivable offer sheet is 4 first round pick, which is wasted capital IMO.

And we probably don’t have the prospect assists to make a trade with the Leafs.

I mean nobody does offer sheets but yeah.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
66,192
28,543
Meh, Vatanen has been a good trade. Maroon was an excellent trade that helped get us in the playoffs, and Shero tried hard to keep him but he went to St. Louis on a bargain for his kid. Grabner was a bust worse than even the detractors at the time thought he would be. Johansson trade hasn't worked out so far with all his injuries and his lackluster play.
The rationalization, or even the effectiveness of said players avoids the core issue though. That is how wise is it for a team obviously still very much in the rebuilding phase to be giving 5 top 100 picks in a year?

You remember in 2014 when everyone was saying "worst prospect pool in the league" the pool with Santini, Severson, Merrill, Coleman, Wood, Wedgewood, Kinkaid, Boucher, Quenneville, Matteau, Jacobs, Pietila....
Well, I don't think we have anything near that right now. Certainly not in terms of Defense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad