Post-Game Talk: Devils 2 - Islanders 0: Wedgeout!!!

3 stars of the game.


  • Total voters
    152
Status
Not open for further replies.

Zippy316

aka Zippo
Aug 17, 2012
19,523
4,538
New Jersey
Wedgewood looked solid but his biggest drawback seems to be his rebound control. Coughs up way too many pucks in front of him or into bad areas after saves. That and his size seems to be what’s holding him back.

Looks like he can hold down the fort here and there but as an every day goalie, I think once he gets peppered with shots with traffic he’s going to struggle. Thankfully we only need him for a couple weeks here and there.
 

Emperoreddy

Show Me What You Got!
Apr 13, 2010
130,431
75,974
New Jersey, Exit 16E
Wedgewood looked solid but his biggest drawback seems to be his rebound control. Coughs up way too many pucks in front of him or into bad areas after saves. That and his size seems to be what’s holding him back.

Looks like he can hold down the fort here and there but as an every day goalie, I think once he gets peppered with shots with traffic he’s going to struggle. Thankfully we only need him for a couple weeks here and there.

It makes me appreciate Big Mac more. He sucks up every puck he touches. You never see high danger rebounds or pucks bouncing in front of him like it was with Wedge tonight.
 

njdevils1982

Hell Toupée!!!
Sep 8, 2006
38,150
24,940
North of Toronto
Wedgewood looked solid but his biggest drawback seems to be his rebound control. Coughs up way too many pucks in front of him or into bad areas after saves. That and his size seems to be what’s holding him back.

Looks like he can hold down the fort here and there but as an every day goalie, I think once he gets peppered with shots with traffic he’s going to struggle. Thankfully we only need him for a couple weeks here and there.

i thought his game 'today' he was very high in the crease when perimeter shots were happening. this is a good thing ….less net to shoot at.

with the in close plays…..he's a on the knees goalie, side to side push off shit...and a few times i was terrified when he slid across the crease too far to leave a possible back door goal.

but shit, its not as easy as it looks

just some observations
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guttersniped

Jersey Fan 12

Positive Vibes
Nov 20, 2006
6,063
2,594
The Hynes defensive system was painful to watch and I’m so glad we don’t have to suffer it ever again. At the very least, I can watch this team without risking an ulcer.

Was it the system or the players? It would seem most of those players are gone or not dressing.
 

MachoDiablo

Registered User
Mar 12, 2012
1,334
1,889
Jersey City
Was it the system or the players? It would seem most of those players are gone or not dressing.
Quite a bit of both, I’d say. Devils’ blue line has lacked talent the past few years, but they were also almost utterly structure-less under Hynes in his last couple of years. Bad goaltending was a culprit, but even once Blackwood came up they were constantly leaving him out to dry.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
66,141
28,474
In my opinion last night was another example of how bad Hynes' system and Shero's ability to address the defense properly was...

Put a defensive structure in place and the defenders and goalies look better...

Add a couple competent defenders to balance out the pairings along with the structure and you have the ability to compete...you give your forwards a chance to dictate by not being on their heels, stuck in their own zone for their entire shift....

The last 5 games are a small sample and probably don't tell much of a complete story....but if there is a story, it's how bad the previous administration ran this team.
 
Last edited:

Better Call Sal

Salnalysis
Nov 24, 2011
25,137
37,270
New Jersey
giphy.gif
 

Spoiled Bratt

Registered User
Jun 29, 2016
4,819
2,111
In my opinion last night was another example of how bad Hynes' system and Shero's ability to address the defense properly was...

Put a defensive structure in place and the defenders and goalies look better...

Add a couple competent defenders to balance out the pairings along with the structure and you have the ability to compete...you give your forwards a chance to dictate by not being on their heels, stuck in their own zone for their entire shift....

The last 5 games are a small sample and probably don't tell much of a complete story....but if there is a story, it's how bad the previous administration ran this team.

Yeah, Lou knocked it out of the park by drafting Ty Smith and you shouldn’t get that much credit when acquiring someone for a 5th round pick in a COVID era that saw teams cutting payroll.

The second you’ll understand that Lou put us behind the 8-ball for the past decade, the better you’ll understand that whoever was taking over was bound to fail. Shero wasn’t brought in to make us competitive, he was brought in to rebuild a sinking ship.

I’ve been disappointed in Jack Hughes since last year but his play so far has been simply eye opening and your constant rants about two 1st overall picks doing nothing is another reason why we’re having a solid start so far.

You need to give credit to the proper people and know how to say "I was wrong".
 

Call Me Al

Registered User
Aug 28, 2017
5,578
6,940
shero was brought in to make us competitive and he would still be here if his loyalty to a failing coach wasn’t blinding his loyalty to the team and its fans
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tretyak 20

Nubmer6

Sleep is a poor substitute for caffeine
Sponsor
Jul 14, 2013
13,732
17,818
The Village
In my opinion last night was another example of how bad Hynes' system and Shero's ability to address the defense properly was...

Put a defensive structure in place and the defenders and goalies look better...
It was my opinion for years that our D wasn't nearly as bad as they showed. I just always thought it was Nas' problem, not Hynes'. I'm still not 100% sure Nas isn't a problem, but I'm coming around.

I'll be convinced if I see our defenders actually progress year over year. I feel like under Hynes virtually none of our defensemen got better. Whatever we got when they first started playing for our team (plus a short adjustment period) was as good as they'd ever be for us.

The second you’ll understand that Lou put us behind the 8-ball for the past decade, the better you’ll understand that whoever was taking over was bound to fail. Shero wasn’t brought in to make us competitive, he was brought in to rebuild a sinking ship.

If we were entering a full rebuild, I would fault Shero for keeping Cory instead of trading him for futures. I think he would easily have brought us that vaunted extra 1st rounder we never got for our rebuild.

That being said, I agree that we really didn't have much else to work with. Shero was at the point where he wasn't looking to build a team so much as he was working to acquire assets. We had to get to a point where we had enough assets to start start swapping for the CORRECT parts to build an actual team. Fitz is benefiting from that now.
 

ChicksDigTheTrap

No quick fixes, no cutting corners and no cheating
Sep 16, 2018
4,926
5,206
Springsteen Country
shero was brought in to make us competitive and he would still be here if his loyalty to a failing coach wasn’t blinding his loyalty to the team and its fans
Actually the reports are he was let go because he was uncomfortable with the collaborative decision making model the owners wanted.
 

Call Me Al

Registered User
Aug 28, 2017
5,578
6,940
yeah those are reports. but i have a suspicion that if the team was doing well he wouldn’t have been let go. that “collaborative decision making” could have been him refusing to fire the coach after a horrible start and owners losing confidence in his own decision making. harris said outright that losing confidence in him was the reason for the firing.
 

Call Me Al

Registered User
Aug 28, 2017
5,578
6,940
i mean it could very well be true that shero didn’t like the owners wanting input on hockey decisions. but after making a terrible hockey decision on his own i’m sure the owners felt like a change was necessary
 

ChicksDigTheTrap

No quick fixes, no cutting corners and no cheating
Sep 16, 2018
4,926
5,206
Springsteen Country
yeah those are reports. but i have a suspicion that if the team was doing well he wouldn’t have been let go. that “collaborative decision making” could have been him refusing to fire the coach after a horrible start and owners losing confidence in his own decision making. harris said outright that losing confidence in him was the reason for the firing.
I do not remember reading that. Any link?
 

ChicksDigTheTrap

No quick fixes, no cutting corners and no cheating
Sep 16, 2018
4,926
5,206
Springsteen Country
i mean it could very well be true that shero didn’t like the owners wanting input on hockey decisions. but after making a terrible hockey decision on his own i’m sure the owners felt like a change was necessary
The reports are clear that the owners wanted the Analytics group more involved. Shero did not like the Analytics group reporting directly to the owner. Multiple people in the organization such as Marty have commented that the Analytics group is now more involved since Shero left.
 

Camille the Eel

Registered User
shero was brought in to make us competitive and he would still be here if his loyalty to a failing coach wasn’t blinding his loyalty to the team and its fans
I agree - and that the team is looking better and stacked with talent is very much Shero’s doing. The depth of talent is showing and Shero’s plan of just stockpiling picks is bearing fruit.

The Hall year was magnificent.

On the other hand his choice of coaching; and the veteran people he added the past seasons after the Hall MVP run weren’t as strong judgmentally as what Fitz has done.
 

Call Me Al

Registered User
Aug 28, 2017
5,578
6,940
shero didn’t quit though he was fired after “winning the offseason” and then sticking with a losing coach long past his expiration date when the season was effectively lost in november
 

Better Call Sal

Salnalysis
Nov 24, 2011
25,137
37,270
New Jersey
Not to help in continuing to rehash this topic, but yeah, if we didn't bottom out to start last year and Shero didn't hitch his wagon to Hynes as long as he did, he'd probably still be here. I'm sure things got testy with ownership and wanting a collaborative environment when it was clear that the team wasn't performing to the lofty expectations that everyone assumed they would have.

If the team stayed competitive the whole year but wound up missing the playoffs, I wouldn't have been shocked to see Shero stay but Hynes still fired. They ultimately did end up going down with the ship together though, even if Shero was here for an extra month or so.
 

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
13,527
13,907
Everyone says the problem was Hynes but I don't see a lot of mention of the goaltenders, which were the real issue, as we'll see moving forward here. Wedgewood played well last night but he played against a garbage offense and he got some breaks. The Devils played all right defensively but they didn't just discover Dmitri Kulikov.
 

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
67,396
31,704
Kulikov and Murray are better low cost moves at improving the D than anything Shero managed in five years. The coaching thing is well documented and I think it’s at least 50-50 Shero would have just kept Nas as the coach too, since his whole MO is hiring young assistants without wattage.

It’s also true Shero was handicapped from improving the goaltending by Cory’s contract and that’s no longer a big factor. But it’s not like Fitz’s big acquisition helped there either.
 
Last edited:

Nubmer6

Sleep is a poor substitute for caffeine
Sponsor
Jul 14, 2013
13,732
17,818
The Village
Kulikov and Murray are better low cost moves at improving the D than anything Shero managed in five years.
True, but to be fair Shero didn't have the opportunities presented to Fitz because of Covid. It's not common for a #2OA defenseman and a defenseman that was playing first pairing for a playoff team to become available at a reasonable price.
 

ChicksDigTheTrap

No quick fixes, no cutting corners and no cheating
Sep 16, 2018
4,926
5,206
Springsteen Country
True, but to be fair Shero didn't have the opportunities presented to Fitz because of Covid. It's not common for a #2OA defenseman and a defenseman that was playing first pairing for a playoff team to become available at a reasonable price.
I am not sure how this is turning into Fitz vs Shero. As I said before, Shero did fine but IMO it was time for a change Shero mistakenly thought the team could contend last year and is not longer here. All that matters to me is that I like where the team is at this time and I am confident in Fitz and the Analytics group/scouts, etc to keep it going moving forward.
 

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
13,527
13,907
Kulikov and Murray are better low cost moves at improving the D than anything Shero managed in five years. The coaching thing is well documented and I think it’s at least 50-50 Shero would have just kept Nas as the coach too, since his whole MO is hiring young assistants without wattage.

It’s also true Shero was handicapped from improving the goaltending by Cory’s contract and that’s no longer a big factor. But it’s not like Fitz’s big acquisition helped there either.

Again, wait two months before saying this. Murray was available for a 5th round pick because he is injured all the time. Kulikov has yet to be on the ice for a goal against 5v5 so of course he's great now.

Both of these guys may have benefitted from the long layoff because they're so banged up. I doubt either one makes it through the season without missing some games.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad