I don't see a double standard. Del Zotto was signed and expected to be something he wasn't. Murray was signed when he was trying to revamp his style .. he made some improvements last year and didn't get the results this year. In both cases they were sent down as reactions to their inability to live up to expectations. Some might reasonably say the expectations were too high or unrealistic. I tend to be less critical of the player in these cases because they are what they are.. Belleville might do Murray some good because he has more time to work with a goalie coach he's worked with before. Maybe he can find his game but I don't know why the same could not be accomplished staying with the team in Ottawa. Del Zotto is never going to be what he was expected to be and was signed to be.
Dorion / Pro Scouting misidentified Del Zotto to be a top 4 D. Further Dorion signed him to a 2 year deal with that expectation. That's on him , no one else.. and not on the player.
Murray is still in the progress of trying to find his game. This was known when he was signed. What he was signed to $ and term is on Dorion. Him not bouncing back to Stanley cup form as quickly as Dorion expected is also on Dorion and not the player.
When players do not perform ... fans are critical of their play. Look at Colin White. A serviceable player..Can play C or RW. An upgrade on most of the bottom 6 if not all of it, and how many lineups is he penciled in for next year? Some fans want him gone in favor of let's say Sokolov.. Is that a double standard? I don't think so just fans being fans.
The biggest issues are the dead weight Dorion is bringing in. If those were decent vets .. there would be less complaints.
I agree with you, what I meant by a double standard is that fans complained about the vets playing poorly & then they complained about them being waived & sent to the AHL. I also agree that most of this or all of it is on Dorion & from our perspective without any inside information on how it was handled internally. And whoever made the call that these were the guys to target in the off season also did a piss poor job. Although maybe the list of UFA defencemen who wanted to come here was not that long. Easy to say to get better players, but what we don't know is what it will cost to bring them here?
I'm not sure it's a double standard, the outcry with Murray was about how the demotion was handled not that they demoted him, and with MDZ it's media commenting on whether it will impact future UFA signings. I don't think many complained about how Dadonov was handled for example, because from the outside looking in, the perception is he was treated respectfully even though things didn't work out.
Maybe I'm wrong, truth be told I haven't really been following how people and media have reacted to MDZ being demoted.
Well Dadonov was traded & they got a return from it while these two were clearly & publicly demoted. As I said above this is all on Dorion & whoever made the decision to go after these players made a huge mistake in hindsight. How the situation was handled is more difficult since we don't really know what was said internally by who to who. I think there was more talk regarding how Murray was handled than MDZ too.
The other thing that keeps gnawing at me is which UFA defencemen were available that actually wanted to come here & maybe that list was not very long. Maybe the only way to get MDZ to come here was to offer a 2 yr deal, but clearly they thought he had more to give than he has shown. Dadonov looks better with a better team than he did here, maybe with a better team MDZ might not look as bad either.
That might have a lot to do with this as well that the team as a whole has been worse than they thought it would be especially the defence & goaltending again. Sometimes they look great as they did on Saturday & other times nothing seems to work & everything ends up in the back of the net. Not sure what the answer is except patience for the future which can't come fast enough.