phillytennis
Registered User
- Mar 4, 2012
- 2,169
- 1,179
Plekanec 2 points in last 8 games.
Parenteau 2 points in last 6 games.(5.5 to be fair)
Galchenyuk 1 point in last 4 games.
etc...
Are they all ineffective at their positions?
I think there's a very strange misconception. A player who played with the same linemate for years, a player who played the same position for years is now in a different role, different line, different position and he does not look like a liability.
In my mind, there's an adjustment period. I believe DD is much better as a C. I also feel Eller is much better as a C and that Plekanec is a much better C as well. It is what it is but I think we can see decent things out of him in due time.
I thought he looked better on Eller's wing or as the 3rd line C though.
I think one big thing is "DD only produces because of max" then he didn't get max and produced nearly a PPG in about the same sample size you find conclusive. That proved he can produce without him. That's a bonus. Now, he's a winger and I think for someone trying to learn a new position after so long, there's a certain adjustment period involved.
That being said, my stance is not specific to DD. I'm a strong supporter of Eller as a C because he wasn't used to being on the wing. It required time for him to adjust and he was only kept there for short periods of time. The same applies to DD for me so I'm not biased on this in case you think so.
I don't understand how people talk so favourably about Eller and are so negatively about Desharnais. Both are very good skaters...DD has better offensive instincts and is the best passer on the team...better vision of the ice than Eller. Eller is not a playmaker...he will never be a playmaker...so forget a role as a top 6 role.
I still think Eller will give a greater return in a trade than DD.