I wonder if Tippett refused to be part of the Doan fiasco and Barroway is using that as cause to fire Tippett and void contract.
Trottier is is my 2nd fav 19 ever (well, 3rd if you count Montana's time in KC). All-time great player, not a great coach...see his time with NYR. Long-term assistant fits him best.I've asked before; why isn't Adam Oates a bench boss anymore? Does he make more doing privates?
How about Bryan Trottier? He should be ready for a HC job.
Also Tippett having the Executive VP of Hockey Ops as well as Head Coach titles could have an impact on those clauses if they do exist.
Although I prefer a clean break, I am fine with Tippett moving to the executive VP position full-time (if he's willing). He does have some skills in that area; the problem has often been his typically over-reliance on the wrong team strategy for a young team with more offensive strengths than he is used to. I still think he's good at finding and putting together a team with solid defensive players. As long as he doesn't go power-crazy with personnel changes and allows Chayka (and his AMs) to do their jobs (and only approve or recommend actions), I'd be okay. Of course, I don't think he would want to stay in that position for 5 years (and probably shouldn't), but if things go well, you never know.
I wonder if Tippett refused to be part of the Doan fiasco and Barroway is using that as cause to fire Tippett and void contract.
hope we hear more about this. Isn't Dater kind of losing credibility?
No thanks to Eakins! Yikes!
That's a good point, wonder if his contract allows the team to involuntarily bump him out of the HC role but stay in Hockey Ops.
Couple other names out there...
Travis Green
Paul McLean - forner Senators head coach
Scott Arniel - NYR assistant
Rod Brind'Amour
I'd say a hire of Eakins might make this team the butt of so many jokes but it already is.
No Eakins.
If this is accurate, it is a cost cutting move.
Or a hockey move to remove a stale and failing coach with his country club as would have happened in literally any other market or scenario that didn't involve being best pals with an ownership faction...
Literally any coach will be an on ice improvement, so I don't think it matters if they get an experienced guy or gamble on a new face like they've done with Chayka.
Literally any coach will be an on ice improvement, so I don't think it matters if they get an experienced guy or gamble on a new face like they've done with Chayka.
Could be both...If its a hockey move, he will just fire Tip, move on, and hire a new coach. If Barroway does that and hires Suter or another name brand coach he has to pay 3 mill a year or more, then yes, it is a hockey move.
If Barroway is saying, we don't want you and we don't want to pay your salalry, so go shop and find a new job, so we don't have to pay you. Then he hires a new coach for 1 mill a year, some assistant or AHL coach, who knows, they are a dime a dozen. Then it is a cost cutting move.
I think Barroway is trying to figure out how to save money on coaching salary's. If he can buyout Tip and pay the new coach less than he had to pay Tip all in, he is ahead, and I think that is his plan.
The absolute worst case scenario on a coaching change is that we watch a last place club instead of second to last for most of next season. The horror.
The absolute worst case scenario on a coaching change is that we watch a last place club instead of second to last for most of next season. The horror.
I just can't help thinking that this is Barroway prettying up the house for a sale.
Pretty hard not to think it at this point. Makes the whole Tippet discussion kind of blah when the change seems more about money than philosophy.