weaponomega
Registered User
I had a dream last week that the Panthers got the first overall pick, the wings got the second and some team called the tanks got the third overall pick. My b's got the 9th then my alarm woke me up and i went to work.
weaponomega said:I had a dream last week that the Panthers got the first overall pick, the wings got the second and some team called the tanks got the third overall pick. My b's got the 9th then my alarm woke me up and i went to work.
weaponomega said:I had a dream last week that the Panthers got the first overall pick, the wings got the second and some team called the tanks got the third overall pick. My b's got the 9th then my alarm woke me up and i went to work.
http://www.tsn.ca/columnists/bob_mckenzie.asp?id=121995oilers112 said:He's going to go to the winner of the draft lottery after next season, because the draft age will be raised to 19. My guess is Carolina or Chicago.
DarthSather99 said:I'm a hockey starved Ranger fan that hasn't seen a decent prospect come onto our team in a long time.
Seachd said:
champben2002 said:Common Ottawa! How about
Crosby Spezza Havlat
Chara Redden
How many teams in the History of Hockey have had that type of #1 line?
Mat said:Al Montoya
nomorekids said:if they do the 4 years\no first overall picks like I think they're going to. I think NYR has the best chance - but the next tier of teams is Phoenix, Carolina, Nashville, Chicago, Buffalo, Calgary
Stormin Norman said:What is the 4 year/no first idea? Haven't heard that one? does it mean teams that have drafted first overall in the past 4 years have no chance? Teams like Columbus traded to get the #1 overall so should not be excluded from this.
I have a feeling it WILL be a small market like Columbus. But I have a feeling he will end up in a small non-deserving hockey market like Carolina, Florida, Anaheim, Nashville or Pittsburgh. Some may say that is great it will help the franchise, I think to artificially boost a franchise a la Pittsburgh with Lemieux is harmful to the league in general.
To win the lottery rights to the top overall pick the rules have always been a team must finish in the bottom five to be eligible. The Rangers have only finished low enough to be eligible for the top pick in the lottery only once in seven years, so to consider them one of the worst teams when there are other more deserving teams who have been in the lottery for several years makes little sense.sirkraut_82 said:if you want to award crosby to the worst teams over the past few years, consider buffalo, pittsburgh, new york rangers, columbus, atlanta and florida.
hawksfan50 said:My own vommit bag will be deployed if SC ends up with:
1.Detroit (I may reque 3-4 such bags)...
2. Toronto
3.NYR