Crosby missed one game and Malkin had one assist in that game. What are you even talking about?[mod]
Malkin was better last year IMO and carried the team when Crosby missed time. Crosby was still quite good though. The year before was also a surprise win for Crosby.
Crosby missed one game and Malkin had one assist in that game. What are you even talking about?
Crosby was clearly better than Malkin and there's a reason the vast majority of the voters thought so, as well.
A primary assist on the game winner in a series that went the full 7 games is clearly making a difference (hint: without it, Pens don't win the series). As did Malkin's 2 points in the game that Crosby went down.
Oh, there's a reason alright.
If primary points are so important, how can you say Malkin was better when he far more 2nd assists?
Sounds like someone doesn't have an argument.
A primary assist on the game winner in a series that went the full 7 games is clearly making a difference (hint: without it, Pens don't win the series). As did Malkin's 2 points in the game that Crosby went down.
It is the same reason Malkin was inexplicably left off the top 100 list.
This is just...what? Is that your definition of what a generational talent is? If it is, are these "Generational" as well in your opinion?
Whats your obsession with that term? Yes, hes one of the best players today, but I'm guessing your list of "generational" players dont include the likes of Jagr, Hasek, Lidström. Why is his PPG, for example, more impressive than Forsbergs? He played in a harder era as well.
Forsberg played his prime in the first DPE.Lidstrom doesn't have numbers. Jagr doesn't have near the same playoff success. Crosby played a greater portion of his career in a lower-scoring era than Forsberg.
Forsberg played his prime in the first DPE.
I would defnitely put forsberg above crosby in terms of allaround game
There is a gap? Crosby would never survive the abuse forsberg got in clutch and grab eraWhich matters not when you view the gap between them in offence.
What's even the point of making a distinction?
Dude wins all the time, scores and is really clutch. He's a generational player and leave it at that.
There is a gap? Crosby would never survive the abuse forsberg got in clutch and grab era
FFS, thought you actually were going to provide some insightful comments. We get it, all DPE players are superior to players from any other era.
This is how it looked in year 2000.
Do you not watch any games nowadays? That's the type of stuff Crosby deals with every game. That's the type of stuff McDavid deals with every game.
I thought you'd at least post a video of something really over the top. Instead, you posted a video of basically the treatment all star players get on a nightly basis.
That is factually incorrect. Powerplays have been at an all-time low for some time now, though they are up in this particular year.Lol it even close. The refs call much more PP now than in the grab and clutch era.
Even if it is incorrect forsberg definitelt took morw abuse than golden boy crosby. Kings played forsberg so hard in 2001 playoffs that he ruptured his spleenThat is factually incorrect. Powerplays have been at an all-time low for some time now, though they are up in this particular year.
https://www.hockey-reference.com/leagues/stats.html