Toggle sidebar

Friedman: Coyotes may consider offers for Conor Garland

AslanRH

AslanRH

Not a Core Poster
Sponsor
Jun 5, 2012
15,246
1,920
Wyoming, USA
Grimes said:
You left out Newhook.
Click to expand...

Avs can find another training partner for their captain then

06658a26ff49be8d3da835484923cdf1b614c5da.gifv
 
  • Like
Reactions: milehigh11
Oddbob

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
15,937
10,483
They won't get enough back to justify moving him. Maybe you get a 2nd and lowish prospect, as Garland doesn't have a long run of being decent. So at best, you get maybe a guy who will be as good as him 2-5 years from now and a small add. Better off keeping him as he has more value to them, then most other teams.
 
BlackTipReefer

BlackTipReefer

Registered User
Mar 25, 2021
79
57
5cotland said:
What the hell am I missing with this guy?

A late bloomer has a good season and a half and all of a sudden he is worth all this.

WTF?
Click to expand...

He's good but that poster is out to lunch. Oilers have much more enticing targets out there for half that price, imo.
 
Unspecified

Unspecified

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Apr 29, 2015
6,115
2,987
Oddbob said:
They won't get enough back to justify moving him. Maybe you get a 2nd and lowish prospect, as Garland doesn't have a long run of being decent. So at best, you get maybe a guy who will be as good as him 2-5 years from now and a small add. Better off keeping him as he has more value to them, then most other teams.
Click to expand...
The trend is "what have you done for me lately" when determining value. I mean the kid had 22 goals last season if people want to some sense of a trend with him. I could easily see a 1st round pick for a kid who is trending upwards and is an RFA after this season.
 
Eggtimer

Eggtimer

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
15,066
12,131
Calgary Alberta
I do not get making your best forward available. I guess its not that much of a stretch though. Its like my team (Devils) saying Hughes is "available" but would take a package that no one in their right mind would take , with hopes that some GM is out of their mind?
But why would a team say this ? It would make said player feel like crap / unwanted so why even bother?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schemp

Filthy Dangles

Registered User*
Oct 23, 2014
28,630
40,244
Eggtimer said:
I do not get making your best forward available. I guess its not that much of a stretch though. Its like my team (Devils) saying Hughes is "available" but would take a package that no one in their right mind would take , with hopes that some GM is out of their mind?
But why would a team say this ? It would make said player feel like crap / unwanted so why even bother?
Click to expand...

Hughes is probably a cornerstone player though, Garland in reality is not.

I get he's a good player, but him being your best player is a problem and somewhat a reason why the Coyotes are not relevant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tony135420

Schemp

Registered User
Nov 12, 2018
4,004
2,483
Forum 40
Eggtimer said:
I do not get making your best forward available. I guess its not that much of a stretch though. Its like my team (Devils) saying Hughes is "available" but would take a package that no one in their right mind would take , with hopes that some GM is out of their mind?
But why would a team say this ? It would make said player feel like crap / unwanted so why even bother?
Click to expand...
It's kinda like
GMBA "everybody's available"
"Even Garland" (least likely)
GMBA "Yes, even Garland, for the right price"
 
  • Like
Reactions: YotesFan47
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom