Nucker101
Foundational Poster
- Apr 2, 2013
- 21,104
- 16,548
being petty, but its Silovs .... and for the most part he has played fine.Difference in this game was ....GOALTENDING. Ingram terrific Silvos not good enough. Silvos was losing track of the puck all game. Main reason the Canucks have faltered is obvious - loss of Demko. Team better hope he is ready when he returns.
Good
Hughes - overstayed some shifts (one time leading to a goal against) but went into dynamo mode late and carried much of the comeback
Zadorov - another who lead the charge late. His rushes and up ice momentum were another critical factor getting the Canucks back in it. Seems so much untapped potential here. Shooting could have been better in this one.
Garland - once again our best forward. Better goal scorer than he is given credit for.
Blueger - just outstanding on the PK. Overall good defensive game. Just can't score.
Hronek - played a ton and was pretty much error free. Out of gas on the Penalty Shot (wish it had just been a penalty - would have ended the Yote PP and given us 4 on 3 with plenty of time - hated when the ref pointed at center)
Did Not like
Silvos - given how he looked coming into the season off the World Cup would say his season has been disappointing. Watching Abby don't know that Tolopilo isn't the better prspect. Silvos continues to look jittery and doesn't track the puck , at times, well at all.
Soucy - not finishing the season well. Big dropoff from form he showed through much of the season. Leaving gaps on defense too often as did Myers in this game.
Boeser - thought call was suspect and don't blame him much for it. However, he had so many chances to do something around the net and couldn't. Played some decent defense but you are never going to pay him for that. Team just affords him so many chances and he flubs too many. Did that consistently in this game.
Suter - did nothing all game and benched for much of it. Has done so little, for so long, you wonder if Podkolzin might be chosen over him.
Others
Pettersson - nice goal and maybe this gets him going. But for much of the time is just another player.
Lindholm - more in the play but still little finish on his shot or his passes. Still not looking like a top rung offensive player.
Guenter looked very good. I think underrated in his draft class. There for the Canucks to pick if they hadn't got involved in the Ekman- Larsen fiasco but likely Benning would have chosen someone else anyhow. Legacy (or curse) of good ole Elmer will play on for years.
I dont know.Sleepwalked through the first 50 and got a point, meh
They have Demko and a lot of these losses the last month are probably wins
Neither is Lindholm it seems.I dont know.
We've got like .919 goaltending 5on5 and Demko isnt going to score for us.
I guess you could try Demko at 3rd line C...Neither is Lindholm it seems.
.881 is not finebeing petty, but its Silovs .... and for the most part he has played fine.
Lindholm in net then.I guess you could try Demko at 3rd line C...
After another 30 AHL games this year, Silovs doesn't look like he has progressed at all from the games he played last season..881 is not fine
Full disclosure my PVR f***ed up and so I missed this game and only saw the extended highlights.
But speaking to the last stretch, it's hilarious to me how many people are panicking without understanding that we are basically getting the quality of goaltending that has the Flyers cratering out of a playoff spot and we are managing to tread water with it.
Our style changes with the backups because we don't trust them to make saves (and with good reason).
If we gave up 35 shots it's at least 6 goals against. Hence, we're containing teams incredibly well, but it hurts our ability to create our own grade A chances because we know that even a 3-on-2 is a puck in the net.
DeSmith has done a good job for a lot of the year, but he's gassed and lost his confidence. Silovs has enticing potential, but neither are remotely NHL quality goaltenders over the long haul.
It's apparent that we have moved to a more conservative system in order to protect them and they STILL give up like 3 goals on 15 shots most nights. That we're winning at all is impressive.
Also, when you're a player who watches your goalie let a bunch of gimmes into the net, it changes how you play. You start trying to do too much, you stop trusting that occupying your ice is enough, now you start trying to prevent the other team from getting any shots at all because doing the right thing (e.g. letting the other team get a shitty shot from outside) gets punished over and over, so you change your behaviour.
Silovs loses his net all of the time, at a non-NHL quality. Like so many goals he gives up he's covering the post and like 3 inches wide and giving away 2 or 3 inches of the net and against these shooters, that's enough to get absolutely ventilated.
Now, it's possible that playing to protect bad goalies has thrown us off our axis enough that we won't have time to get it back in which case the chicken littles can cluck to their heart's content.
But what will likely happen, and will happen moving forward into next year and beyond, is that with our superstar goaltender in net we can play a more balanced game and utilize the D we have shown while not being terrified of shots from anywhere, so we will generate more A+ chances.
I'm excited to see what's to come and I hope you are too.
Maybe give Topolio a game, Demko isn't going to be ready, as it is they are rushing him.DeSmith has done a good job for a lot of the year, but he's gassed and lost his confidence. Silovs has enticing potential, but neither are remotely NHL quality goaltenders over the long haul.
Yes the PVR's fault?Full disclosure my PVR f***ed up and so I missed this game and only saw the extended highlights.
But speaking to the last stretch, it's hilarious to me how many people are panicking without understanding that we are basically getting the quality of goaltending that has the Flyers cratering out of a playoff spot and we are managing to tread water with it.
Our style changes with the backups because we don't trust them to make saves (and with good reason).
If we gave up 35 shots it's at least 6 goals against. Hence, we're containing teams incredibly well, but it hurts our ability to create our own grade A chances because we know that even a 3-on-2 is a puck in the net.
DeSmith has done a good job for a lot of the year, but he's gassed and lost his confidence. Silovs has enticing potential, but neither are remotely NHL quality goaltenders over the long haul.
It's apparent that we have moved to a more conservative system in order to protect them and they STILL give up like 3 goals on 15 shots most nights. That we're winning at all is impressive.
Also, when you're a player who watches your goalie let a bunch of gimmes into the net, it changes how you play. You start trying to do too much, you stop trusting that occupying your ice is enough, now you start trying to prevent the other team from getting any shots at all because doing the right thing (e.g. letting the other team get a shitty shot from outside) gets punished over and over, so you change your behaviour.
Silovs loses his net all of the time, at a non-NHL quality. Like so many goals he gives up he's covering the post and like 3 inches wide and giving away 2 or 3 inches of the net and against these shooters, that's enough to get absolutely ventilated.
Now, it's possible that playing to protect bad goalies has thrown us off our axis enough that we won't have time to get it back in which case the chicken littles can cluck to their heart's content.
But what will likely happen, and will happen moving forward into next year and beyond, is that with our superstar goaltender in net we can play a more balanced game and utilize the D we have shown while not being terrified of shots from anywhere, so we will generate more A+ chances.
I'm excited to see what's to come and I hope you are too.
I agree.They need to put back the 3rd line of Blueger, Garland ,Joshua back .That line was killer.Also we paid a premium for Lindholm get him on the top 2 lines.Our special teams are going to be our downfall come playoffs if this coaching staff can't fix it.The more I think about it the more cole myers in ot pk is absurd and amateur.
I expect more out of this coaching staff.
So after, what, two crappy games we are giving up on DeSmith despite his otherwise stellar year this year? And now Silovs is rubbish after his FIRST loss of the season in his role as No.3? If Demko comes back and we suffer from similar results what will all the Demko followers say? You all know what they will say doncha...The impression I get from the DeSmith signing...(which I think was a good one!)
We do not have a tender in the system that is at the journeyman age and is a capable backup.
We do have a couple younger guys that have starter potential but they need more work with Ian and more games.
We know DeSmith, and even though stylistically he doesn’t fit our longterm goalie model, he is worth bringing in as a goalie we know that will perform well relevant to salary costs AND not block the guys coming up through the system.
Now they need to find a new backup and get Silovs another year in the A.
This. Both DeSmith and Silovs have been playing very well considering the fact that the team in front of them is crumbling. Maybe Demko's return will galvanize the team into playing better but even if that happens it's a bad sign IMHO...I dont know.
We've got like .919 goaltending 5on5 and Demko isnt going to score for us.
Thought he played fine last night. Not as noticeable but was working hard. I like him on the PK.Wasn't able to catch the game but Mikheyev with 11:40 minutes? Damn...I thought he was good vs Vegas. That's disappointing to see.