Per Sjoblom
Registered User
- Jan 3, 2018
- 7,134
- 12,736
I love his voice. Together with Ella Fitzgerald my dad's favorite.
They had to insist, because they need tangible proofs that he was drunk and it's the procedure.Baited maybe the wrong word, insisted if you rather.
Why did he DUI while on probation? Because he's an idiot.
Yes, it's their job to neutralize a suspect, it's their job to conserve their weapons, and it's their job to ''serve and protect''.
They did none of these things. Guy was passed out, he wasn't a risk anymore, there was no need to use excessive force and they mishandled the situation. Yes yes I'm clueless and mister student here with a wealth of world life experiences from the sounds of it knows whats up.
They didn't do a good job, the guy was a bozo. He still did not deserve to die. That's all there is to it.
It's disturbing because you can't even understand the point. You have a wall of simplicity in front of your face ''guy resisted arrest, grabbed a taser from the cops, ran, aimed/shot, and they killed him in response'' justified, case closed.
You don’t deserve to die even if you kill someone. But if you have a weapon and use it against the police, you will most likely get shot and if you die, it’s too bad.Because you don't deserve to die for a DUI, even if you resist arrest and get a hold of a taser.
Kriss E, do you know why he was DUI ? I don’t and I don’t care, he did it and needs to pay for it. No reason is good enough to DUI, you always have alternatives.Do you know why he was DUI
...do you know why he has his rap sheet...do you know his upbringing and the struggles of his life? I guess who gives a crap about any of this because OMG he stole the taser and shot it at the cops! Kill that guy!
No he didn't have to, just like cops didn't arrest me when I was trespassing lost wasted and instead they just drove me home, didn't even give me a big ticket, just a tiny fine so they can file something in response to call.
Nothing is wrong with me. I’m not the one downplaying DUI to defend a narrative.What is wrong with you?
A lot of people in this thread are sincerely wondering.
The officer returned fire at a suspect armed with a spent (unloaded) taser. As soon that taser shot missed the threat level was zero.
So now movements can't be stopped in 1 second?
Dock workers are one powerful union. If they decide to act, it could paralyse the whole world. I don't see management stepping in this time.
We've gone past this, maybe take a hint?Nothing is wrong with me. I’m not the one downplaying DUI to defend a narrative.
We are talking about humans, not robots… You can’t expect a human to react faster than he could.
Understanding Police Officer Reaction Time to Stop Shooting
They are not robots, it should not be that hard to understand.
Understanding Police Officer Reaction Time to Stop Shooting
Nothing is wrong with me. I’m not the one downplaying DUI to defend a narrative.
We are talking about humans, not robots… You can’t expect a human to react faster than he could.
Understanding Police Officer Reaction Time to Stop Shooting
They are not robots, it should not be that hard to understand.
Understanding Police Officer Reaction Time to Stop Shooting
Nothing is wrong with me. I’m not the one downplaying DUI to defend a narrative.
We are talking about humans, not robots… You can’t expect a human to react faster than he could.
Understanding Police Officer Reaction Time to Stop Shooting
They are not robots, it should not be that hard to understand.
Understanding Police Officer Reaction Time to Stop Shooting
I would think the area from PEI, and the southern parts of NB and maybe Halifax would be the where most of the movement will be, imo. It’s mostly going to be business and family reasons for travelling.
Going from St. John’s, NL to Halifax is a 2 day project. a full day across NL, overnight on the ferry and 7 hours to Halifax.
So now it's 11 players
11 NHLers test positive in Phase 2 testing - TSN.ca
Is there one major port in the world that doesn't have ties to the underworld?
Think that's gonna turn out to be a rhetorical question,who really knows?
Yes we are talking about humans, human life, squeezing that 9mm trigger should be the absolute last resort. He knew the taser shot was a miss, you don't need to count to 3 Mississippi to know if you got hit by a taser.
He just returned fire, which was unnecessary at this point. I don't know why he did it, reflex? training? fear? All of the above? Dunno, but the end result is someone died because of it.
This is arguing about additional shots so it is irrelevant to the discussion. Even the first shot was not necessary in the current case. They are not robots, but they should not be dumb as a brick either.
Unless their own car lights are enough to debilitate them for 1+ second, they had plenty of time not to pull the trigger the first time.
There was no prior situation stress as they were responding to an immobile car in a drive-through. As per the audio from videos, there is no other chatter than the two officer, so another point from the article ruled out.
I am not arguing about 3 shots being fired, I'm arguing against any shot being fired at all which is completely different.
It is
Don't know if there are any, but I'm willing to bet most have ties.
This one is more clear. Reasonableness and Reaction Time in Police Use of Force Incidents
"In a complex environment such as our scenario, the officer’s response time can range from .7 to 1.5 seconds.(2) During that time the suspect may be moving. In the time it takes the officer to complete the response (from identification of the stimulus to the physical sequence), the suspect may end up in a completely different location or facing a different direction. Then we must add more time for the same process to occur in reverse—meaning it will also take time for the officer to perceive the movement of the person and respond. This process is why some suspects are shot in the back. In such cases, when the officer started the process of firing his or her weapon, the suspect was facing them, but in the time it took to fully respond, the suspect had turned."
Fighting with a suspect is not a situation of stress ? Knowing that he stole your weapon is not either ?
He stole a deadly weapon and used it against the cop, they answered in a reasonable amount of time to stop the threat.
They tried to stop him physically, they tried to use the taser gun and nothing worked, when he attacked them with a deadly weapon, they used a justified force to stop him.
At this point, all I can say is "Ok buddy".
So now movements can't be stopped in 1 second?
You argue with me, because you think a cop should be able to stop his shooting motion with almost no delay. I show you that you are asking too much from them with an article and a study, then you shift to "he should not have been shot"...
Have a good night.
Well, the plot gets thicker... strangely disturbing but interesting at the same time (my thoughts with all the families involved).
So now it's 11 players
11 NHLers test positive in Phase 2 testing - TSN.ca