Every press conference Cuomo is giving has numbers of the recovered on the same slide as the number of dead. Maybe DeBlasio's too, but I stopped watching his.
Lol what trash journalism.
Counterpoint - you can use the exact logic from that crappy article and argue deaths are overstated because docs are just labeling people corona out of an abundance of caution when they don't have sufficient tests.
Which btw is actually what happening during bird and swine flu. Hell, the article even says some states have backtracked on numbers at times.
I am so sick of these articles that say NOTHING of value and just have click-bait titles. Let's try some common sense journalism. Based on how contagious it is and daily US/China travel (nevermind other countries), it was definitely hitting the US hard in December. So yea, in that sense, deaths are probably understated. BUT, that also means the mortality rate is certainly drastically overstated.
Did you actually
read the article? There's a lot of interesting things laid out in it that you may have missed. Here's some, since it's long and dense:
-"Public health experts say that an accurate count of deaths is an essential tool to understand a disease outbreak as it unfolds: The more deadly a disease, the more aggressively the authorities are willing to disrupt normal life. Precise death counts can also inform the federal government on how to target resources, like ventilators from the national stockpile, to the areas of the country with the most desperate need."
-Many rural areas don't have tests available for coroners to use. This indicates that: a) there's still many areas with a shortage of tests and b) there's a new potential vector of spreading.
-There was no uniform way to report deaths from coronavirus. States were being left to figure it out themselves. This has the potential to make bad data even worse.
-There were upticks in flu and pneumonia-like deaths in the months before Covid knowledge was a thing here. Of this, the article notes, "Across the country, coroners are going through a process of re-evaluation, reconsidering deaths that occurred before testing was widely available."
I think a lot of the criticism on the article is looking just at the headline, which the reporters are not responsible for. A lot of people don't realize that the the headlines for these articles are written by the editor and not the reporters.
It's an interesting article that underlines the point that the numbers we have are not accurate, despite a sensational headline. Not exactly mind-blowing there, but having all these experts quoted in it certainly gives weight to it and opens up more room for consideration.
---------------------------------
I've more-or-less ignored death numbers as a tool of comparison since this began, since it appears that most countries were caught off-guard and are likely having the same issues we are in terms of accurate reporting (And as someone who studied a lot of data science and statistics, this particularly interests me). The thing I was always most worried about, and you can go back to the previous TaN to see my posts, is that the hospitals were going to be overwhelmed in places like NYC and other dense areas.